What's new

China’s Airports Lead The World – So Why The Delays?

Shotgunner51

RETIRED INTL MOD
Joined
Jan 6, 2015
Messages
7,165
Reaction score
48
Country
China
Location
China
China’s airports lead the world – so why the delays?
Groundbreaking buildings have made the Chinese proud and foreign visitors envious. The same cannot be said of services and management

By Wang Xiangwei 24 Jun 2017


20160621113746709.jpg

Beijing Capital International Airport Terminal 2

Foreign visitors to China are most likely to be impressed by the modern airports, high-speed railways, subways, and superhighways sprouting across the country.

This is particularly true for visitors from the United States where much infrastructure is getting old and worn out. In a tweet this month, Lloyd Blankfein, the CEO of American investment bank Goldman Sachs and a frequent visitor to China, once again praised the country’s infrastructure and lamented how America was lagging behind. “Arrived in China, as always impressed by condition of airport, roads, cell service, etc. US needs to invest in infrastructure to keep up,” he tweeted.

Untitled.png

China’s investments, worth trillions of yuan over the past decade, have produced world-class infrastructure projects on an unprecedented scale and speed. These projects have become the envy of the world and a showcase for the country’s autocratic leadership. For instance, until 2002, Beijing, with 20 million people, had only two subway lines. Since then, Beijing has built 17 lines crisscrossing the city with a total length of 574km.

d8cb8a3c66c01a99a2001a.jpg

The five-storied Huangjuewan Flyover in Chongqing. Chinese infrastructure is the envy of the world.

China’s airports, which won Blankfein’s praise, are even more impressive. Take Terminal 3 of the Beijing international airport, the massive glass and steel structure billed as the world’s largest airport building. Designed by the British architect Norman Foster, who also designed Hong Kong’s Chek Lap Kok airport, the terminal was completed in less than four years for the Beijing Summer Olympics in 2008, a task some had thought impossible. At the time, it was hailed as the world’s most advanced airport building and was designed to handle 50 million passengers a year by 2020. This year, China announced 74 projects to build new airports and develop existing ones by 2020, including an even bigger airport in Beijing, scheduled for operation in 2019 and designed to take 72 million passengers by 2025.

While all this hardware has made Chinese proud and foreign visitors envious, the same cannot be said about the software, in terms of management and services. On that, China has much to learn, even from America whose shabby infrastructure is sneered at by many Chinese.

Take China’s airports. They may be the world’s most advanced buildings but their management and services are backward. International surveys have consistently put US airports and airlines among the top 20 for punctuality, while China’s airlines and airports have monopolised the bottom 10. This is despite China’s total volume of airborne passenger traffic being just a third of that in the US.

A_maglev_train_coming_out,_Pudong_International_Airport,_Shanghai.jpg

Shanghai Pudong International Airport Terminal 1

These days, travelling through Terminal 3 is hardly a pleasant experience. The problem is compounded by badly thought out designs and facilities. For one, the canopy covering the light rail train station makes it feels like a sauna in summer and an ice box in winter because of a lack of proper air conditioning.

Even worse is that passport control and security inspection points for departure are no more than five metres apart. Given the massive volume of passengers and elaborate security checks, passengers are often packed like sardines several lines deep. But wriggling through those points is only the start of the nightmare. Lengthy flight delays mean passengers accumulate as much anger and frustration as they do mileage points.

Fights between passengers and the poor airline and airport crews have become increasingly violent as delays run into hours without any convincing explanation. According to official sources, about a quarter of flights on the mainland were delayed last year. The China Administration of Civil Aviation (CAAC) claimed China’s overall on-time performance was 76.4 per cent in 2016, a rise of 8.4 percentage points from 2015. But for most passengers, the improvement has hardly been felt.

The worst delays often occur on the busiest route linking Hong Kong, Guangzhou and Shenzhen with Shanghai and Beijing on the eastern seaboard, served by China’s most modern airports and biggest airlines. It’s now accepted that a flight of no more than three hours between Beijing and Guangzhou or Shenzhen is often delayed by two or three hours, and it is not rare for delays to stretch into 10 hours or more, not counting the hours spent on the congested roads to and from the airports.

timg.jpg

Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport

Like the rest of the world, the biggest cause of delays according to the CAAC is the weather, which accounted for 56 per cent of flight delays in 2016, up from 29.5 per cent in 2015. While weather delays are understandable, it has become a convenient excuse for bad management and services. There have been too many instances in which weather has been blamed for massive delays despite it being fine at both ends of the flight.

Rain or snow can wreak havoc. At Terminal 3, any light snow or rain can cause lengthy delays, making one wonder how Tokyo Haneda Airport managed to top the global rankings for on-time performance in 2016, the second year in a row, and how Singapore’s Changi airport always outranks Beijing. Tokyo receives much more snow and Singapore much more rain.

Even worse, as passengers are fed up with weather being used as an excuse, the airline and airport crews now like to use three magic words – air traffic controls – to fob off frustrated passengers as nobody has a clue how the system works (though CAAC says air traffic controls accounted for less than 10 per cent of the delays in 2016).

It is well known that the Chinese air forces control more than 70 per cent of air space, creating an impossible situation in which the fast expansion of civil aviation is taking place within limited civilian air space. Although the Chinese government has promised better integration of civil and military aviation, the progress has been minimal, and the whole process has been very much opaque. As China becomes more assertive over the South and East China seas, it has frequently staged large-scale naval and air exercises and scrambled fighter jets to intercept foreign military planes from air bases on the eastern seaboard – over which flight paths often overlap with the busiest air routes.

Last month, on-time performance of Chinese airlines dropped to 72.46 per cent, down 6.3 percentage points year-on-year. CAAC blamed thunderstorms for 50.58 per cent of delays but also said “airborne activities”, a euphemism for military activities, accounted for 29.66 per cent of the delays in Xinjiang and the eastern region.

The summer months from June to August are the rainy season in much of the country and the CAAC has warned of more delays ahead.

Wang Xiangwei is the former editor-in-chief of the South China Morning Post. He is now based in Beijing as editorial adviser to the paper


http://www.scmp.com/week-asia/opinion/article/2099540/chinas-airports-lead-world-so-why-delays
 
.
The real issue had always been military airspace...in HK, if you missed your slot to fly to Shanghai or Beijing, you are screwed for the next 6 hours or more for a new slot. That's the reason the HSR is an important complementary service to reduce the traffic and spread it out to other services.
 
.
Good hardware(the airports), Bad software(the controls and managements)
 
.
Good hardware(the airports), Bad software(the controls and managements)
Well various municipal governments are fully aware of the fact that services sector is indeed lagging behind, and are taking solid actions to address the issue, say opening up management contracts to 3rd parties (already progressing in Beijing Metro L4, L14, Shenzhen Metro L4), or recruiting contract-based senior executives (Shanghai Metro). A few airports are doing the same, talking to Hong Kong IA and Singapore Changi Airport about possible cooperation.
 
.
The real issue had always been military airspace...in HK, if you missed your slot to fly to Shanghai or Beijing, you are screwed for the next 6 hours or more for a new slot. That's the reason the HSR is an important complementary service to reduce the traffic and spread it out to other services.

I have always thought that it was deliberate.

Almost no one would travel in HSR for long distances (like Beijing to Guangzhou) if the flights were punctual and airports efficient.

Why would anybody spend 10+ hours in HSR when they can do with 3 hours in flight.
 
.
The real issue had always been military airspace...in HK, if you missed your slot to fly to Shanghai or Beijing, you are screwed for the next 6 hours or more for a new slot. That's the reason the HSR is an important complementary service to reduce the traffic and spread it out to other services.
Yep, big headache! But I don't blame the airlines or airports, most of the time they're also powerless, air space is beyond their control. HSR can solve problem within a certain distance, but say I travel Shanghai-Kunming often, or Beijing-HK, only flying, and wish myself good luck for no delay.
 
.
Forcing most Chinese to take high speed train to spur own Chinese industries is good. While can't say for flight as most plane are foreign import. There is reason why China domestic flight is always behind HSR in terms of everything.

Once C919 inducted for service. You can magically suddenly seen military airspace control is ease and flight congestion is reduced.
 
.
Forcing most Chinese to take high speed train to spur own Chinese industries is good. While can't say for flight as most plane are foreign import. There is reason why China domestic flight is always behind HSR in terms of everything.

Once C919 inducted for service. You can magically suddenly seen military airspace control is ease and flight congestion is reduced.

But there are better methods to do it.

You can impose a short travel tax on airlines.

Or even ban flights for short distances (less than 1500 km) .

Delays are a big headache, as they sap the time of everyone, including the people who can't possibly go via HSR. Even international flyers.
 
.
Yeah service levels are very important for airports. Singapore's Changi Airport is not as grand as the airports in the Middle East yet it is ranked among the top consistently.

http://www.worldairportawards.com/Awards/airport_year_winners.html

That's because the service is polite, fast and efficient. Though not luxurious, the airport is optimized for comfort and relaxation after a long flight. Human-scale, spacious, clean, green, music, natural lighting etc.

6159392-Wonderful_Terminal_3_at_Changi_Airport-_SIngapore-0.jpg


gw1.jpg
 
.
But there are better methods to do it.

You can impose a short travel tax on airlines.

Or even ban flights for short distances (less than 1500 km) .

Delays are a big headache, as they sap the time of everyone, including the people who can't possibly go via HSR. Even international flyers.
Imposing tax will end up hurting China itself. Most of the mess up flight in China is domestic. In these way, many Chinese are frustrated and they will take HSR. HSR from train to service and everything is made in China. It may not be as fast a plane but will still get the job done.

Mark my words. Once C919 enter service. That spur domestic airline making big order purchase. Domestic flight management will significantly improve.
 
.
Yeah service levels are very important for airports. Singapore's Changi Airport is not as grand as the airports in the Middle East yet it is ranked among the top consistently.

http://www.worldairportawards.com/Awards/airport_year_winners.html
It's almost common knowledge that Changi Airport is world best! Truly international for travelers of all backgrounds, and impeccable micro-management to every possible details. In fact Changi is a multinational airport planner, investor, operator and consultant. Examples are King Fahd Airport of Saudi Arabia, Sochi Airport of Russia, etc.

Untitled.png


http://www.cai.sg/

We have world-class industries and engineering, but we do lack services expertise. Good news is that many Chinese airports are expanding cooperation with Changi to improve management, I hope they will soon reach Changi benchmark.
 
.
It's almost common knowledge that Changi Airport is world best! Truly international for travelers of all backgrounds, and impeccable micro-management to every possible details. In fact Changi is a multinational airport planner, investor, operator and consultant. Examples are King Fahd Airport of Saudi Arabia, Sochi Airport of Russia, etc.

View attachment 406464

http://www.cai.sg/

Good news is that several Chinese airports are expanding cooperation with Changi to improve services, I hope for best results!

Hopefully! Competition is stiff with so many upcoming airport infrastructure in the ASEAN region. These airports will be newer, shinier and maybe cheaper than Changi Airport's older terminals. Being clean and green may no longer be our unique selling point (USP) as many airports are also doing the same. We shouldn't rest on our laurels and think that we will always be among the top. We need to differentiate from our competitors through our high service levels while constantly upgrading our older terminals to keep up in the race to be the air-hub of ASEAN.

Here is a new mixed-use complex under construction to connect T1, T2 & T3, enhancing connectivity and convenience between the terminals.


Interactive, convenience, family-friendly. These will be our new USP.
 
.
Once C919 inducted for service. You can magically suddenly seen military airspace control is ease and flight congestion is reduced.
Then C919 must enter service asap, millions of air travelers are anxiously waiting for an open sky!

Hopefully! Competition is stiff with so many upcoming airport infrastructure in the ASEAN region. These airports will be newer, shinier and maybe cheaper than Changi Airport's older terminals. Being clean and green may no longer be our unique selling point (USP) as many airports are also doing the same. We shouldn't rest on our laurels and think that we will always be among the top. We need to differentiate from our competitors through our high service levels while constantly upgrading our older terminals to keep up in the race to be the air-hub of ASEAN.

Here is a new mixed-use complex under construction to connect T1, T2 & T3, enhancing connectivity and convenience between the terminals.


Interactive, convenience, family-friendly. These will be our new USP.
The video is just stunning, excellent sharing! That's what I said, micro-management to every possible details, discover every possible ways to build best user experience, this differentiates Changi. Say before it was adding shopping mall experience to users, being family-friendly, maximize convenience, catering to different cultural backgrounds, now it's adding theme park experience, and resurgence of green nature. In search of excellence is a never-ending journey, good job Changi guys!
 
.
I have always thought that it was deliberate.

Almost no one would travel in HSR for long distances (like Beijing to Guangzhou) if the flights were punctual and airports efficient.

Why would anybody spend 10+ hours in HSR when they can do with 3 hours in flight.

It's not deliberate bro. It was a victim of circumstance. And yes no one will take the whole Beijing-Guangdong trip if there are more flights. The demand is in the in between trips along the route around 3-5hr trips (around 500km+). Even today, people are not taking the whole Beijing Guangzhou trip but prefer air travel, yet the Beijing-Guangzhou route is full to the max.

The problem is not because the flight is not punctual due to mismanagement but because of limited airspace, there cannot be more flights from point A to B, and the slightest of delay would cause a cascading effect on the subsequent flights. We are not Changi efficient but that does not mean we are reaching Indian style inefficiency bhai.

The demand for both air travel and HSR is crazy. I would suggest China open up the military airspace to reduce congestion.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom