What's new

China trying to wrest control of Gwadar via CPEC to cripple India: US media

ashok321

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
17,942
Reaction score
4
Country
Canada
Location
Malaysia
China trying to wrest control of Gwadar via CPEC to cripple India: US media
http://www.business-standard.com/ar...to-cripple-india-us-media-117112900554_1.html

1494860661-3755.jpg




China is maneuvering Pakistan to cripple India via the $62 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) project, which it has described and projected as a transformative economic initiative, an Ame rican expert on Asian affairs has claimed.

In a recent article for the Foreign Policy magazine, Professor Carol Christine, Associate Professor in the Security Studies Program at Georgetown University's Edmund A Walsh School of Foreign Service USA, said that she has spoken out against the dangers of CPEC at Balochistan-related events held here on several occasions.


In her recent article, Professor Christine wrote, "The local Baloch community is displeased with the development plan because it will predominantly alter the demography of the area. Prior to the commencement of Gwadar's expansion, the estimated population of the region was 70,000, however, If the project continues to reach an attainment, the populace would be around two million - most of whom will be non-native residents, though many penniless Baloch has already been dispersed from the area."

She also pointed out to the fact that ardent Baloch militants have attacked these projects and Chinese personnel at frequent intervals, but without much success because they lack funds and training.

Beijing has projected Gwadar's development aggressively and dignified it with the title 'Gateway City' under the USD 62 billion CPEC.

Baloch freedom fighters continue to pledge to resist and obstruct the Chinese plans to occupy Gwadar, and their concerns are gradually eliciting the support of Washington DC

Local Baloch communities are vexed and are engaging in illicit activities to halt development.

Baloch National Movement leader and former fisheries minister Kachkol Ali, who is living in exile in Norway, recently tweeted, "China is violating Article 8 of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples."

The aforementioned article of the UN Declaration iterates the native community and individual's prerogative not to be subjected to coerced assimilation or shatter their cultural norms. It also states that countries are obliged to provide effective mechanisms to prevent any action which may deprive the indigenous people of their integrity and divest them out of their realm, resources and region.

The oppressed Baloch, according to The Nation, feel that their ancient land will be taken over by the Chinese; and that approximately six times more Chinese will be accommodated in the Gwadar city by the year 2023.

This is substantiated by a recent report, published in The News International newspaper that revealed that a mega housing project "China-Pak Hills" has been announced by the China-Pak Investment Corporation (CPIC).

The CEO of the corporation, Jian Zheng, disclosed plans to finance a $500 million in the first phase of the much criticized housing project China-Pak Hills, which will expectedly accommodate almost half-a-million white collar Chinese by 2023.

CPIC will complete the unprecedented development project, which stretches over 10 million square feet, in three phases.

Though the Pakistan government has rebutted claims that the Gwadar Port Authority has permitted construction of the project, calling it bogus, CPIC has put forward documentary evidence; depicting the possession of "no objection" certificate with the company from the concerned authority for the International Port City Project.

What is an added worry is that both the armies of Pakistan and China have promised to transform Gwadar into another Shenzen, a major city in Guangdong Province, China.Shenzen was once stricken with poverty in 1979, but at present, it is symbol of a strong Chinese economy.

New Delhi is simmering over Beijing's plan to extend its influence through Gwadar Port, which it considers to be a part of the Indian Ocean. It is also hard to ignore the United States' deep interest in the warm waters of the Arabian or Persian Gulf Sea, and therefore, inconceivable that it will allow China to take over Gwadar easily.

 
. .
It's Christine Fair, the article quotes her name as:

Professor Carol Christine, Associate Professor in the Security Studies Program at Georgetown University's Edmund A Walsh School of Foreign Service USA

So it's no surprise that this reads like a completely nonsensical article. Of course she bleats about this issue in an idiotic way and then somehow makes the headline about India, and doesn't even mention India in the article itself. It's because none of this has much to do with India.
 
. .
Even if it did cripple India why would Pakistan care? But it doesn't and it is the usual 'I have no idea what I'm talking about' drivel article.
 
. .
India should stop bitching and join CPEC. US is no friend of India.
How can that benefit us?

India already have overland trade route, and sea route to China. If any countries that didn't join BRI they will not be deprived of any investments. Neither, the routes China construct are not exclusive for them. So, if India wants to use, say Myanmar - Bangladesh - China trade route we can simply access the route and still no need to be part of BRI.
 
.
How can that benefit us?

India already have overland trade route, and sea route to China. If any countries that didn't join BRI they will not be deprived of any investments. Neither, the routes China construct are not exclusive for them. So, if India wants to use, say Myanmar - Bangladesh - China trade route we can simply access the route and still no need to be part of BRI.

If your understanding of OBOR is as narrow as road or route, then it's true that OBOR is not attractive for India. If you widen the OBOR as infrastructure development of developing nations, you will understand it's actually a gift for India. However I know India will miss the opportunity anyway, India used to arrive late.
 
.
If your understanding of OBOR is as narrow as road or route, then it's true that OBOR is not attractive for India. If you widen the OBOR as infrastructure development of developing nations, you will understand it's actually a gift for India. However I know India will miss the opportunity anyway, India used to arrive late.
I'm not just talking about roads or railways. I'm talking about everything, why there is a need to sugarcoat it in the name of some xyz initiative. While you can simply invest in individual economies. Every country in the region can work as an individual entity, receive funding for any project they need.

Secondly, in most of the democratic nations, projects are availed through global tenders. i.e, any country/organization can participate in such projects. Put forward their bid and accept if found suitable. There is a lot of grey areas which is one of the reason why India didn't join in. Also, the loans from China is not so cheap is it? The methods of loan extraction has also raised many eyebrows in India as seen in Sri Lanka. Although India may not have issues in loan repayment, we still doubt the need and viability of such projects. There is no infra that India can't build, which only China can. Dams, roads, bridges, ports.

Again, you are welcome to invest in India as an individual nation. As seen, investment from China is growing at a faster rate. If the relationship continues to grow in a positive direction both can benefit from such a move. But I failed to see any requirement for India to join BRI in order for Chinese investments.
 
.
Stopped reading at article by Christine Fair

cheap women selling herself for a few cheap indian rupees.

has Christine Fair got any credibility :omghaha:
 
.
Stopped reading at article by Christine Fair
cheap women selling herself for a few cheap indian rupees...
"One of the most common affronts that accomplished women countenance is the discounting of those very achievements which we worked very hard to obtain, usually overcoming misogynist hurdles to do so. "

...has Christine Fair got any credibility :omghaha:
'...I am mansplained to on a daily basis…no fewer than ten times a day. Even though I have written books on the Pakistan army and other security-related matters, men still feel the need to explain that “war stuff” to me even though the only qualification they have is reading tweets on the subject. And when you call out said mainsplainers, they actually have the temerity to mansplain why they are not really mansplaining."'
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom