What's new

China to fight with India for Southern Tibet by 2035

Vinayak Tiwari

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
184
Reaction score
-2
Country
India
Location
India
“RECONQUEST” OF SOUTHERN TIBET (YEAR 2035 TO 2040)
China and India share a long border, but the only sparking point of conflicts between the two countries is only the part of Southern Tibet. China has long been the imaginary enemy of India. The military objective of India is to surpass China. India aims to achieve this by self-development and importing advanced military technologies and weapons from the U.S, Russia and Europe, chasing closely to China in its economic and military development.

In India, the official and media’s attitude is more friendly towards the U.S, Russia and Europe, and is repellent or even hostile against China. This leads to unresolvable conflicts with China. On the other hand, India values itself highly with the aid from the U.S, Russia and Europe, thinking it can beat China in wars. This is also the reason of long-lasting land disputes.

Twenty years later, although India will lag behind more compared to China in military power, yet it is still one of the few world powers. If China uses military force to conquer Southern Tibet, it has to bear some losses. In my opinion, the best strategy for China is to incite the disintegration of India. By dividing into several countries, India will have no power to cope with China.

Of course, such plan may fail. But China should at least try its best to incite Assam province and once conquered Sikkim to gain independence, to weaken the power of India. This is the best strategy.

The second best plan is to export advanced weapons to Pakistan, helping Pakistan to conquer Southern Kashmir region in 2035 and to achieve its unification. While India and Pakistan are busy fighting against each other, China should take a Blitz to conquer Southern Tibet, at the time occupied by India.

India will not be able to fight a two front war, and is deemed to lose both. China can retake Southern Tibet easily, while Pakistan can control the Kashmir. If this plan cannot be adopted, the worst case is direct military action to take back Southern Tibet.

China will be on the leading role in its military power, may be only second to the U.S. Therefore, India will lose this war.

SOURCE-CHINESE DAILY MAIL
 
I m gonna have penthouse in moon by 2035..Seriously, WT*
 
Much earlier than that ..... And they will get a bloody nose for that ......
 
Last edited:
“RECONQUEST” OF SOUTHERN TIBET (YEAR 2035 TO 2040)
China and India share a long border, but the only sparking point of conflicts between the two countries is only the part of Southern Tibet. China has long been the imaginary enemy of India. The military objective of India is to surpass China. India aims to achieve this by self-development and importing advanced military technologies and weapons from the U.S, Russia and Europe, chasing closely to China in its economic and military development.

In India, the official and media’s attitude is more friendly towards the U.S, Russia and Europe, and is repellent or even hostile against China. This leads to unresolvable conflicts with China. On the other hand, India values itself highly with the aid from the U.S, Russia and Europe, thinking it can beat China in wars. This is also the reason of long-lasting land disputes.

Twenty years later, although India will lag behind more compared to China in military power, yet it is still one of the few world powers. If China uses military force to conquer Southern Tibet, it has to bear some losses. In my opinion, the best strategy for China is to incite the disintegration of India. By dividing into several countries, India will have no power to cope with China.

Of course, such plan may fail. But China should at least try its best to incite Assam province and once conquered Sikkim to gain independence, to weaken the power of India. This is the best strategy.

The second best plan is to export advanced weapons to Pakistan, helping Pakistan to conquer Southern Kashmir region in 2035 and to achieve its unification. While India and Pakistan are busy fighting against each other, China should take a Blitz to conquer Southern Tibet, at the time occupied by India.

India will not be able to fight a two front war, and is deemed to lose both. China can retake Southern Tibet easily, while Pakistan can control the Kashmir. If this plan cannot be adopted, the worst case is direct military action to take back Southern Tibet.

China will be on the leading role in its military power, may be only second to the U.S. Therefore, India will lose this war.

SOURCE-CHINESE DAILY MAIL
what a load of crap..... 2035... let us see....
 
0.jpg
 
Do you have the lottery number for this Saturday? The Jackpot is over Euro 4 m! I would donate a huge party in a cool location in India. :)
 
You think it a joke but I do hope my fellow Chinese take it seriously.
 
How come when people talk about an indo china war, they forget about the principle of MAD?
 
How come when people talk about an indo china war, they forget about the principle of MAD?

Because MAD does not apply in a Sino-Indian War scenario.

Since both sides have a "No First Use" policy. If neither side can fire nukes first, how will they come into play?

In any case, the Indian nuclear arsenal is only about 1 megaton in total, mostly comprised of 20kt fission bombs. Whereas even one single Chinese nuke is over 4 megatons... which means one single Chinese nuke has more destructive power than India's entire nuclear arsenal.

That's why the Indian Naval Chief said that "India cannot match China by conventional OR non-conventional means".
 
Back
Top Bottom