What's new

China strengthens hold in African export arena

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
ANALYSIS
Date Posted: 14-Jul-2008

Jane's Defence Weekly

China strengthens hold in African export arena

Matthew Smith Defence Economics Analyst - London

Development of a military export capability potentially gives China extra leverage in the contest for orders in Africa. Matthew Smith reports

As China increasingly develops its indigenous defence-industrial capabilities and looks to exert its political and economic muscle on a global level, it appears inevitable that its military exports will rise and China will find itself in increasing competition with other export powers

A survey of potential future markets shows that a congruence of technical abilities, budgetary availability and China's broader geopolitical objectives makes Africa stand out as a future destination for export competition.

Unsurprisingly for such a vast continent, the factors that lead countries to look to African countries as export markets are complex.

Oil and resources
Western countries such as France view oil-rich states such as its former colony of Morocco or Libya (where it has historically enjoyed warm relations) as natural targets for exports of advanced military equipment. However, there is also high demand for lower-tech, cheaper equipment. Russia has traditionally supplied many of the regimes in Africa and would look to maintain those relationships and re-assert its position as a dominant regional player and counter a perceived US hegemony.

China already has a well-documented interest in Africa's resource wealth and has been vigorous in its cultivation of economic ties, considering access to energy and commodities to be an essential element of its continuing economic development.

Developing a military export capability potentially provides China with an additional source of leverage when negotiating these critical access arrangements.

The issue of arms embargoes should also be considered: a series of EU and UN embargoes put a number of African states beyond the reach of Western defence organisations. Active EU embargoes (as of June 2008) are held against Côte d'Ivoire; Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC); Liberia; Somalia; Sudan; and Zimbabwe. Mandatory UN embargoes are operated against Côte d'Ivoire; DRC rebels; Liberia; Rwanda rebels; Sierra Leone rebels; Somalia; and Sudan (Darfur region). Furthermore, one attraction of Africa may be that no one supplier state can claim to dominate arms supply across the whole continent: as a result, it can be viewed as a source of myriad opportunities.

It is certainly the case that among the top African spenders Libya and Algeria appear committed to Russian-sourced equipment, although France has been keen to compete in both these countries, whereas Egypt, Morocco and Tunisia favour US or European equipment. Other countries not blessed with large budgets or US Foreign Military Financing assistance appear to be more eclectic in their approach, sourcing arms from a global set of suppliers.

China has until now been a relatively small player in Africa as it has been less able to supply the big players with the advanced military equipment that is available from the USA, Europe or Russia.

Instead, China has concentrated on those smaller countries that can assist in its search for secure access to energy and commodities, such as Sudan and Tanzania while investing substantially in non-military infrastructure projects. However, as Chinese export capabilities improve, and its need to ensure access to energy to maintain its domestic economic growth becomes more acute, this will change.

Recent export deals show how Chinese exports are concentrated in Asia and Africa. According to the UN, in 2006 China exported defence equipment to Bangladesh, the Republic of Congo, Gabon, Jordan, Namibia, Niger, Pakistan, Tanzania, Thailand and Zimbabwe.

China supplies aircraft to Egypt and Kenya, and Jane's Defence Forecasts indicates there are potential opportunities in Algeria, Botswana, Egypt, Kenya and Morocco. These are in both training/light strike aircraft, such as the K-8 (also being marketed to Venezuela among others) and the JF-17 multirole combat aircraft.

JF-17

The JF-17 in particular will place China firmly in the role of a competitor to both Russia and the US as the aircraft is being positioned as an alternative to Russian Sukhoi aircraft and (presumably secondhand) F-16s.

Yang Ying, vice-president of China Aero-Technology Industry Corporation (CATIC) - China's largest aviation industry trading company - said on 19 February 2008 at the Singapore Airshow: "We don't only want to sell this aircraft to Pakistan. When we first thought of the JF-17, we wanted to export this aircraft globally, particularly to African and Asian countries. "We know that many of our customers might also look at the F-16 or the Sukhoi, but we also know that we have a specific advantage with the JF-17; it is much cheaper than other aircraft. We think it is about one third of the cost of an F-16."

The combination of low costs and few overt political strings may prove an increasingly attractive combination to African countries, particularly if the technological and qualitative improvements in its military equipment continue and the benefits of a close relationship with an emerging great power become increasingly apparent.

© 2008 Jane's Information Group
 
The profit of JF-17 thunder will be shared by Pakistan and China 50-50, There have been many orders from Zimbabwe, Sudan, Egypt and few other African countries.

JF-17 Thunder is a very good option for African nations Airforces because it is cheap and is comparable to F-16 and JAS-39 Gripen .
 
The profit of JF-17 thunder will be shared by Pakistan and China 50-50, There have been many orders from Zimbabwe, Sudan, Egypt and few other African countries.

JF-17 Thunder is a very good option for African nations Airforces because it is cheap and is comparable to F-16 and JAS-39 Gripen .

I believe Azerbaijan is also interested, this would be a good sign due to the interests of many nations. This proves that the JF-17 satisfies these nations requirements of a low-cost affordable jet yet effective in their roles.

This is good for China and Pakistan.
 
China is still a small player in Africa. But well done China!
 
China is still a small player in Africa. But well done China!

Now your being humble, China is actually an active big player on the continent, that is why there are a so-called "scramble to Africa". China is a rising nation and growing at a fast pace. If they want to continue to grow they would require all the resources they can get their hands on.

Africa is filled with this opportunity and their main strategy has been successful due to the "no strings attached" and "win-win" approach.

Some codemn this and some say it is effective.
 
Now your being humble, China is actually an active big player on the continent, that is why there are a so-called "scramble to Africa". China is a rising nation and growing at a fast pace. If they want to continue to grow they would require all the resources they can get their hands on.

Africa is filled with this opportunity and their main strategy has been successful due to the "no strings attached" and "win-win" approach.

Some codemn this and some say it is effective.

No African country speeks Chinese but French or English. Don't under-estimate the influence left from history.

"win-win" wise, his is a two way process: from Africans' point of view, after their resources being shipped out, what European colonists left there are poverty and war with empty touting of human rights and interference of their internal affaires; what China leaves there are roads, factories and refineries, and leave them to live the way they like. So some African courtiers like China more than Europe. On the other side, China also needs African resources, but hesitates to follow the Europeans mostly failed methods.
 
No African country speeks Chinese but French or English. Don't under-estimate the influence left from history.

I didn't mean as in big player as in enforcing mandarin on to the continent. That would be like colonizing the place and making them your slaves.

I was more concerning on the activity the Chinese are doing. In that terms, they are a big player, building infrastructure as you have mentioned and getting raw materials in return.

"win-win" wise, his is a two way process: from Africans' point of view, after their resources being shipped out, what European colonists left there are poverty and war with empty touting of human rights and interference of their internal affaires; what China leaves there are roads, factories and refineries, and leave them to live the way they like. So some African courtiers like China more than Europe. On the other side, China also needs African resources, but hesitates to follow the Europeans mostly failed methods.

Yes, I am fully aware what the "win-win" term means, that's why I have used it. Unlike the European model of "win-lose". That is why I have indicated the success of the Chinese approach.

The Chinese are fully aware that from day 1 that they decide to have this "African Adventure" they know the sentiments of the Africans. The Chinese would have done their homework. They know that the Africans have a bitter experience in the past colonized by the European powers.

The Chinese doesn't want to follow in this footstep as this would lead to the same fate for them as the former colonizers. Instead, they use this "win-win" approach to send the Africans the message that China is coming to your continent for business and not colonize the continent like past powers.

I guess the Chinese motto is "we want your resources and we offer you buildings of infrastructure". No more, no less.
 
They china are also investing with soft loans-eg:congo 1bill US.so far they r playing their cards right but it is not a free ride as the US has set-up their AFRICOM regional defence org to counter chinese influence. Let's see what happens
 
Back
Top Bottom