What's new

China steadily moves ahead in global innovation rankings: report

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
China steadily moves ahead in global innovation rankings: report

Xinhua | Updated: 2017-06-16


A cyclist tries Chinese bike-sharing company Mobike's new orange bike in Manchester. [Photo/provided to chinadaily.com.cn]

GENEVA - The first-ever middle-income country to join the world's top 25 innovative economies in 2016, China this year continues moving ahead on the list by three notches, displaying a strong performance in several indicators, according to the latest Global Innovation Index (GII) released on Thursday.

Ranking 22 on the GII this year, China again becomes the only exception in the top 25 of the innovation list, with the rest 24 all being high-income economies.

A closer look into the general index shows that China moves up one spot to the 16th position in innovation quality, retaining its position for the fifth consecutive year as the top middle-income economy and getting closer to high-income economies.

This movement can be attributed to a number of strong indicators, including domestic market scale, knowledge workers, patents by origin, high-tech exports, and industrial designs by origin, all of which top their sub-rankings.

European countries take eight places out of the top 10, with Switzerland remaining its No. 1 position in the GII for the seventh consecutive year. It's followed by Sweden and Netherlands, the latter having leaped from the ninth last year to the third in 2017. The United States remains at the fourth, followed by the UK and Denmark, the rest in top 10 being Singapore, Finland, Germany and Ireland.

The GII findings also reveal a large gap between high-income and middle-income economies, and without China, the difference in average scores between these two groups is expanding in many indicators.

Overall, the top 10 on the GII perform better than the 11-25 group in all seven pillars of indicators: institutions, creative outputs, knowledge and technology outputs, business sophistication, market sophistication, infrastructure, and human capital and research.

"Efforts to bridge the innovation divide have to start with helping emerging economies understand their innovation strengths and weaknesses and create appropriate policies and metrics," said Soumitra Dutta, Dean of SC Johnson College of Business at Cornell University, a joint releaser of the GII. "This has been the GII's purpose for more than ten years now."

Unusually, this year's GII, under a theme of "Innovation Feeding the World", gives a special attention to food and agriculture. It foresees innovation as the key to sustain food production, processing, distribution, consumption, and waste management in the next decades, when agriculture and food sector will face an enormous rise in global demand and increased competition for limited natural resources.

"We are already witnessing the rapid, worldwide emergence of 'digital agriculture,'" said Bruno Lanvin, INSEAD Executive Director for Global Indices. "Now there is an urgent need for 'smart agriculture' to optimize supply and distribution chains and foster creative new business models that minimize pressure on land, energy and other natural resources -- while addressing the needs of the world's poorest."

Jointly released by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Cornell University, and INSEAD, the 2017 GII is in its 10th edition this year. The rankings are now a leading benchmarking tool for business executives, policy makers and others seeking insight into the state of innovation around the world.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2017-06/16/content_29766714.htm

***

The most difficult phase of the race just starting. Still 21 countries to beat.

@GS Zhou , @Han Patriot , @AndrewJin , @Shotgunner51 , @cirr
 
.
Most of the so-called rankings made by western media is nothing but JOKE. Here is one another example. Look at the list,
- Netherlands is more innovative than USA, Germany and Japan?
- Hongkong SAR of China is more innovative than Mainland China? Even New Zealand is more innovative than China!! Haha, good knowledge to learn.

U1.jpg


This ranking is indeed a very very nice joke book.

The ranking is made by a combination of records from different dimensions. One of the dimension called as "Government Effectiveness". China's ranking on this dimension is No. 47; the No. 46 country is, ohhh, Italy. So, according to this joke book, Italy has a more efficient government than China. Congratulations to Italian people!!
 
.
The ranking is made by a combination of records from different dimensions. One of the dimension called as "Government Effectiveness". China's ranking on this dimension is No. 47; the No. 46 country is, ohhh, Italy. So, according to this joke book, Italy has a more efficient government than China. Congratulations to Italian people!!

One remembers Berlusconi and mafioso-style governance. :enjoy:

That's efficiency.

 
. .
Sure we all know about the quality of rankings and forecast by West.
Yes, let's look at some facts.

WHAT is this? WIPO already has first hand world IP data and details, that's innovation results. It's funny two western colleges (Cornell University, INSEAD) come into the picture, add load of factors not related to IP and manufacture a so-called "global innovation" index. How come domestic credit to private sector (4.1.2) be a factor? And relate "hi tech imports" to "knowledge absorption" (5.3)? What the heck foreign direct investment net outflows (6.3.4) does with innovation? What baffles me is wikipedia yearly edits (7.3.3), or even video uploads on YouTube (7.3.4), seriously? What a bull crap index.


WHO manufacture this index? On top of original WIPO data, two western colleges (Cornell University, INSEAD). I walk through 10 pages of intro, among 41 authors, 0 from China. Not even one author from the nation with world's largest IP?


WHY, instead using original WIPO data & report, the two western colleges manufacture an index since 10 years ago, and hail it as the hallmark of "global innovation"? Perhaps the answer lies here:

WIPO 1883-2015.png
 
.
Most of the so-called rankings made by western media is nothing but JOKE. Here is one another example. Look at the list,
- Netherlands is more innovative than USA, Germany and Japan?
- Hongkong SAR of China is more innovative than Mainland China? Even New Zealand is more innovative than China!! Haha, good knowledge to learn.

View attachment 404033

This ranking is indeed a very very nice joke book.

The ranking is made by a combination of records from different dimensions. One of the dimension called as "Government Effectiveness". China's ranking on this dimension is No. 47; the No. 46 country is, ohhh, Italy. So, according to this joke book, Italy has a more efficient government than China. Congratulations to Italian people!!


You do understand that these rankings try to figure out normalized efficiency parameters?

In fact, Switzerland, Singapore, Netherlands etc. would be some of the most efficient and innovative economies because they produce so much research and innovation output with so little size.

Also, Hong Kong SAR is in fact ahead of Mainland China in research per unit population.

Also, I am actually very sympathetic to all concerns. Everyone will have concerns regarding any innovation matrix.

Similarly, the moderator's suggestion here that IP should be used to measure innovation. Well, okay. What kind of IP? Only patents? Or revenues/royalties for patents as well? Perhaps we should measure Standard essential patents, which are the most valuable patents in the world?

Domestic Patent filings are pretty much useless, because of the HUGE variability in quality.

PCT is better, but still not totally complete.

To measure industrial innovation activity, I will measure the following variables:

  1. PCT Patents
  2. Expenditure for applied research, and development
  3. Net royalties earned
  4. Ownership of SEP Patents
 
.
To use the so-called normalized efficiency parameters to evaluate innovation, and even try to defend it, that's as silly as use "# of military planes per unit of population" to evaluate the military power. I guess BELARUS very likely to win the title of "World No.1 Airforce country", if we use such indicator.

BELARUS, a country with 9 million population, has ~100 modern combat aircrafts (MiG-29, Su-25) in service. Meanwhile, the population size of China is 150x of Berlarus, but China obviously doesn't have 15,000 military aircrafts. I feel so sad, because our PLA Airforce is even much weaker than Airforce of Belarus. :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
even video uploads on YouTube (7.3.4)? What a bull crap index.
Haha, youtube video uploads relevant to innovation capability. Very insightful knowledge!!

I want to design my own framework on Innovation Index. I will use the Youku video uploads, plus pictures sharing via the Wechat Friends Circle, as the No.1 indicator!
 
.
Haha, youtube video uploads relevant to innovation capability. Very insightful knowledge!!

I want to design my own framework on Innovation Index. I will use the Youku video uploads, plus pictures sharing via the Wechat Friends Circle, as the No.1 indicator!
Yep, WIPO is an international org under United Nations that specialise in IP, they have all the wealth of data and knowledge, but how can they let two western colleges fabricate a garbage index, hailling it "Global" and sponsor its release? When wikipedia edits and youtube uploads become "innovation" factors, how desperate is it to "feel good".

Yes I guess they will hail this "feel good index" as hallmark of innovation, when in cruel reality, in Top 100 Patent Applicants Worldwide, China has more corporations than the west COMBINED.

 
.
Haha, youtube video uploads relevant to innovation capability. Very insightful knowledge!!

I want to design my own framework on Innovation Index. I will use the Youku video uploads, plus pictures sharing via the Wechat Friends Circle, as the No.1 indicator!
desperate attempt.
Next time pls include the number of call centre workers! I think it is more legit than YouTube uploads.
 
.
Do they count the hundredthousand "inventions" and billion "investments" into stuff like Solar Roadways or Juicero and all these millions of worthless conartist and scam -o startups, leeching and squandering government innovation and inventor funds into these "innovation" indices?
 
.
Lol Singapore scored poorly in general education particularly for expenditure in education, where it came in at 102nd place.

Last year Singapore topped PISA and TIMSS in all subjects for both primary and secondary school students. Isn't it actually a good thing that we managed to achieve such a result with a relatively low expenditure in education?
 
.
Lol Singapore scored poorly in general education particularly for expenditure in education, where it came in at 102nd place.

Last year Singapore topped PISA and TIMSS in all subjects for both primary and secondary school students. Isn't it actually a good thing that we managed to achieve such a result with a relatively low expenditure in education?
Just a masturbation ranking by the falling country
 
.
Congratulations to China. May China reach ever new heights.

May Pakistan-China partnership reach ever new heights.
 
.
this is a per capita ranking, so u guys should be happy with China' s rank. u r not happy enough? Okay, then look at Russian's rank, those poor guys r in the same group with Vietnam. it is not a joke.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom