What's new

China seizes Mitsui O.S.K. ship over unpaid wartime contract compensation

BoQ77

BANNED
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
8,704
Reaction score
0
Country
Viet Nam
Location
Viet Nam
China seizes Mitsui O.S.K. ship over unpaid wartime contract compensation
By Kyoko Hasegawa

National Apr. 21, 2014 - 05:30PM JST ( 108 )

TOKYO —

The Japanese government on Monday warned that the seizure of a Japanese ship in Shanghai over pre-war debts threatened ties with China and could undermine the very basis of their diplomatic relationship.

Authorities in Shanghai seized the large freight vessel in a dispute over what the Chinese side says are unpaid bills relating to the 1930s, when Japan occupied large swathes of China.

The move is the latest to illustrate the bitter enmity at the heart of Tokyo-Beijing ties, with the two sides embroiled in a dispute over the ownership of a small archipelago and snapping at each other over differing interpretations of history.

Shanghai Maritime Court said Saturday it had seized “the vessel Baosteel Emotion owned by Mitsui O.S.K. Lines… for enforcement of an effective judgement” made in December 2007.

“The arrested vessel will be dealt with by the law if Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd still refuses to perform its obligations,” the court said.

Chinese and Hong Kong media said the seizure was related to a verdict by a court in Shanghai that said Mitsui must pay about 2.9 billion yen ($28 million) in relation to the leasing of two ships nearly 80 years ago.

Reports said that in 1936, Mitsui’s predecessor Daido Shipping Co rented two ships on a one-year contract from Zhongwei Shipping Co.

However, the ships were commandeered by the Imperial Japanese Navy and were sunk during World War II, reports said.

A compensation suit was brought against Mitsui by the descendants of the founder of Zhongwei Shipping, and in 2007 a Shanghai court ordered Mitsui to pay about 2.9 billion yen in compensation.

Mitsui appealed against the decision but in December 2010 the Supreme People’s Court turned down their petition for the case to be retried.

Mitsui has argued that it is not liable to pay compensation given that the ships which Daido rented were requisitioned by the Japanese military during the war, according to Japan’s Kyodo News.

On Monday Japan’s chief government spokesman Yoshihide Suga said the seizure undermined the 1972 joint communique that normalised ties between Japan and China, in which Beijing agreed to renounce “its demand for war reparation from Japan”.

“It could also intimidate Japanese companies doing business in China as a whole and hence Japan is deeply worried and strongly expects China to take appropriate measures,” he said.

It appears to be the first time the assets of a Japanese company have been confiscated in a lawsuit relating to wartime or occupation compensation, Kyodo reported.

But it comes as a set of lawsuits related to wartime forced labor in Japan have been filed in China against Japanese corporations.

China has long maintained a policy of not accepting such civil lawsuits. But a Beijing court for the first time has agreed to hear a lawsuit by Chinese citizens demanding compensation from Japanese firms over forced labor, their lawyer said last month.

“Including this incident, China’s set of policies on this issue could shake up in a profound way the spirit of normalising diplomatic ties between Japan and China that is inscribed in the 1972 joint communique,” Suga said.

The value of Japanese companies’ investment in China dropped by half in the first quarter of this year from a year earlier to about $1.21 billion, Chinese government data said.

Meanwhile, the chief of Japan’s navy on Monday visited China for the first time in five years to attend a regional symposium.

The gathering in Qingdao is aimed at preventing unintended military clashes in the region—including the South China Sea, where Beijing has territorial disputes with several countries, and the East China Sea, where it claims sovereignty over Tokyo-administered islands.

Navy chief Katsutoshi Kawano told reporters before leaving that “if participating countries can establish common rules between their warships and jets, that would be effective”.

However a Chinese navy spokesman said Sunday there were no plans for an individual meeting with the Japanese side, according to public broadcaster NHK.

(c) 2014 AFP
 
The title is wrong. It is pre-war, not wartime.

Great Move!! CHINA!!!

The compensation agreement signed between China and Japan in 1972 only applies to the two countries, not citizens.

The Chinese citizens are free to pursue for compensation from the Japanese citizens, corporations such as forced labours, lost of resources, etc.

The Japanese corporations are in for a rough ride. Pay up or get out.

The next country in China's gun sight could be the UK.
 
Japanese corp should be scared of Chinese movements
 
Japanese are welcome here in India. India and Japan will do wonders in Asia.

Monster is rising and it seems there will be clashes in Asia before it is put in its place.
 
Speak for yourself, seeing how India's bad reputation with Pakistan, Bangladash, Nepal & Sri Lanka. :D

The bold part ,I do not think so India is seen as a hostile country, even relations with Pakistan are improving now a days.
 
Good move China!
Watch out for backslash!
 
Last edited:
Japan lodges protest over China’s seizure of ship
AFP-JIJI
Tokyo said Tuesday it has lodged a formal protest over China’s seizure of a Japanese ship over unpaid bills dating back to the 1930s, the latest move underscoring the bitter enmity between the Asian giants.

Authorities in Shanghai said Saturday they had impounded the large freight vessel owned by Japanese shipping giant Mitsui O.S.K. Lines in a dispute over what the Chinese side says is money owed from the 1930s, when Japan occupied large swaths of its neighbor.

The two sides are embroiled in a territorial dispute over the Senkaku Islands, as well as snapping at each other over differing interpretations of history.

On Tuesday, some Japanese media suggested the ship’s seizure was meant to underline Beijing’s assertiveness ahead of U.S. President Barack Obama’s arrival in Tokyo on Wednesday, part of an Asian tour aimed at reinforcing Washington’s regional security alliances.

“We have told the Chinese side through diplomatic channels that we regret its seizure of the vessel. . . . We demand China take appropriate measures,” Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga told reporters in Tokyo.

The move could “intimidate Japanese companies doing business in China,” Suga said, adding Japan was “deeply worried.”

Suga said Monday that the ship’s seizure undermines a 1972 joint communique that normalized ties between Japan and China, in which Beijing agreed to renounce “its demand for war reparations from Japan.”

China replied that the civil case had “nothing to do” with war reparations.

On Saturday, the Shanghai Maritime Court said it had seized the vessel “for enforcement of an effective judgment” made in December 2007.

Chinese and Hong Kong media said the seizure was related to a verdict by a Shanghai court that said Mitsui must pay around ¥2.9 billion ($28 million) in relation to the leasing of two ships nearly 80 years ago.

Reports said that in 1936, Mitsui’s predecessor, Daido Shipping Co., leased two ships on a one-year contract from Zhongwei Shipping Co.

The ships were reportedly commandeered by the Imperial Japanese Navy and were sunk during World War II.

A compensation suit was brought against Mitsui by the descendants of the founder of Zhongwei Shipping, and in 2007 the court ordered Mitsui to pay compensation. China’s Supreme People’s Court later rejected an appeal against the judgment.

The ship seizure comes as a set of lawsuits related to wartime forced labor have also been filed in China against Japanese corporations.
 
We don't know whether we could ask for penalty of KMT soldiers damages our properties in 1945, North Vietnam ?
 
Back
Top Bottom