What's new

China Imposes a Steep Tariff on U.S. Poultry

Status
Not open for further replies.

ao333

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
1,289
Reaction score
0
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
Days after it flexed its economic muscle in a diplomatic dispute with Japan, China continued to display a more assertive international economic policy on Sunday as it imposed steep tariffs on poultry imports from the United States.

China’s commerce ministry announced on its Web site that it would impose import tariffs on American poultry of up to 105.4 percent. It said the tariffs reflected the result of its own antidumping investigation, which looked at whether the United States was harming China’s poultry industry by exporting chicken parts for less than it cost to produce them.

The commerce ministry started the investigation less than two days after President Obama imposed steep tariffs on Chinese tires a year ago. Chinese officials have denied that the inquiry was in retaliation, but poultry is one of the few categories in which the United States runs a trade surplus with China, making it an ideal target for Chinese trade actions.

The tariffs are another example of China’s willingness to use its economic leverage when it feels it is being challenged. China is also continuing its unannounced halt on shipments of rare earth minerals to Japan, according to officials in that industry, part of a still-simmering dispute over Japan’s arrest of a Chinese fishing boat captain.

“China’s rising assertiveness on the international economic stage reflects its growing economic might and the self-confidence of its leadership, but is tempered by the realization that it faces many challenges in terms of its own development,” said Eswar S. Prasad, an economics professor at Cornell.

Carol J. Guthrie, a spokeswoman for the United States trade representative, said, “We are disappointed that duties are to be imposed and will be examining the determination for consistency with applicable rules.”

Quarrels over products as diverse as chickens and rare earth minerals might seem like minor trade spats. But they come against the backdrop of China’s vigorous defense of its currency policy this year, and its stepped-up activity in the World Trade Organization.

China broke the peg of its currency, the renminbi, to the dollar in June but has permitted it to appreciate less than 2 percent against the dollar since then. In recent weeks, Chinese state media have criticized the United States for pressuring China to reduce its intervention in currency markets and allow the renminbi to rise against the dollar.

China has also begun filing its own W.T.O. cases to challenge other countries’ policies in the last three years, which it did not do for nearly six years after it joined the multilateral group in 2001. These include the cases against the tire tariffs and European Union over antidumping measures against Chinese footwear. The W.T. O. has extensive rules on antidumping tariffs. China has used those rules to challenge other countries’ penalties.

Some experts on Chinese economic policy say Beijing is still committed to cooperative relations with trading partners.

“They don’t want to be perceived as the guy flexing his muscles, because they are so interdependent with the outside world, especially with Japan and the United States,” said Jiang Wenran, a specialist in Chinese natural resources policy and China-Japan relations at the University of Alberta in Canada.

But Beijing officials face intensifying internal pressure to stand up for China’s perceived national interests, as many Chinese have become increasingly outspoken and nationalistic in their postings on Chinese Internet sites.

“China feels increasingly under siege as it becomes an international economic power, as others try to contain it,” Mr. Jiang said. “They don’t want to appear to be weak, because domestic pressure is mounting.”

China is an important market for American poultry, particularly for portions like chicken feet, which are a delicacy in China but barely marketable in the United States, said Gary Blumenthal, the chief executive of World Perspectives, an agriculture trade consulting firm in Washington.

American farmers and the Obama administration are likely to be particularly disappointed by the new poultry tariffs because China’s increasing affluence has resulted in a surging appetite for protein, one that American chicken farms hoped to satisfy. “China is viewed as a potentially hugely growing market for poultry,” Mr. Blumenthal said.

The United States exports about $4 billion a year of chicken products, of which $678.2 million went to China last year, according to Global Trade Information Services in Columbia, S.C.

China’s dispute with Japan over rare earth minerals continues to be murky, especially because the commerce agency has denied that shipments were halted. “According to the information we know, we didn’t make any restrictions,” Chen Rongkai, a commerce ministry spokesman, said in an e-mail on Saturday.

Officials at the General Administration of Customs, which is independent of the commerce ministry, have maintained a public silence through the confrontation with Japan. But rare earth industry officials say customs agents have been blocking shipments. A woman answering the phones at the trade control office of the customs agency said Saturday that no information was available on the interruption in rare earth shipments to Japan.

Rare earths are important for automotive, electronics and clean energy industries. China mines 93 percent of the world’s tonnage of rare earths, and over 99 percent of some of the least common and most valuable rare earths.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/27/business/global/27yuan.html?ref=china

Talk about being pissed off...
 
Last edited:
.
Talk about being pissed off at the US...

I don't think China is pissed off at all.

Exports to the US count for less than one percent of our total economic growth. There are plenty of markets around the world willing to pick up any minor slack from their end.

In fact, the USA might be doing us a favour by reducing interdependence, because if they have a double-dip recession like all the economists are talking about... at least they won't drag us into it again like the credit crunch.

This action is just a diplomatic response... as per usual in Chinese politics.
 
.
US farm products are dangerous. they contain so many synthetic hormones and antibiotics that the average rate of development has increased in the US within the past 20 years, so much in fact that girls as young as 9 start adult development. in addition, they are dangerous breeding grounds for multiple-drug resistant bacteria that if spread into the general population, would cause unimaginable disease. not to mention genetically engineered crops whose modified (either directly or indirectly) genes may have unforseen protien products that act as toxins, or whose products can be metabolized into toxins. say no to toxic US agriculture.
 
.
say no to toxic US agriculture.
How amusing. Everyone knows you can't trust the milk in China. Furthermore every year I get a flu shot, and almost always at least one of the three strains one is immunized against is a disease that originated in China due to the bad agricultural practice of raising ducks and pigs together. (The flu originates in the ducks, who pass it on to pigs, who pass it on to people. If pigs and ducks aren't in close proximity, the flu can't develop into a strain that infects people.) Should the U.S ban or impose a steep tariff on Chinese agricultural products (tea? canned fruit? apple juice?) until the Chinese shape up their health and farming systems?
 
.
How amusing. Everyone knows you can't trust the milk in China. Furthermore every year I get a flu shot, and almost always at least one of the three strains one is immunized against is a disease that originated in China due to the bad agricultural practice of raising ducks and pigs together. (The flu originates in the ducks, who pass it on to pigs, who pass it on to people. If pigs and ducks aren't in close proximity, the flu can't develop into a strain that infects people.) Should the U.S ban or impose a steep tariff on Chinese agricultural products (tea? canned fruit? apple juice?) until the Chinese shape up their health and farming systems?

swine flu originated in the US and mexico, according to 2009 flu pandemic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia . did the US propaganda machine wipe your mind already?
 
. .
swine flu originated in the US and mexico, according to 2009 flu pandemic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia . did the US propaganda machine wipe your mind already?
Guess the Chinese censorship of the Internet worked...

"Swine" Flu - H1N1
Given that this latest version of the 1918 flu virus first surfaced in Mexico the world dallied briefly with calling it the Mexican flu, but the Mexicans weren’t going to be lumbered with being blamed for the latest outbreak of Influenza A, and protested furiously. So it got stuck with being called swine flu because it was initially thought to have been picked up by humans from pigs. However medical research tells us it is far more likely to have been the other way round. It is also worth noting here that it is now believed that pigs caught the 1918 Spanish flu from humans. (3)

Following the 1968 flu epidemic (an H3N2 subtype) researchers discovered that influenza’s natural home is in ducks and waterfowl, not pigs. It is now known that at least three or four of the Influenza A epidemics to circle the globe in the last 110 years originated in the Guangdong region of southern China where huge numbers of pigs, domestic ducks and chickens and wild waterfowl live in traditional ecological intimacy.

Following the outbreak of the Hong Kong flu in 1997 (an H5N1 subtype) researchers began carefully isolating viruses from ducks in the live-poultry markets of the Guangdong city of Shantou. What they discovered overturned previously held beliefs about the evolution of influenza.
Or how about imported drywall/sheetrock from China?
 
. .
Unfortunately, Vietnamese are still suffering from the aftereffects of Agent Orange as illustrated below:
So how is this related to the current US-China trade issue?
 
. .
How was your ranting about swine flu relevant to a thread about poultry tariffs?

You're the one who restarted the trolling here after everyone had stopped.
You might want to tell your boy to control his own anti-US attitude. And get his facts straight.
 
.
You might want to tell your boy to control his own anti-US attitude. And get his facts straight.

I find it hard to sympathise with you gambit, when you have clearly shown that you are a racist towards Chinese people.

May be this penchant for dictatorship is deeply ingrained in Chinese sheeple but not in the US.

Racism: Negative stereotypes based on race.

You were the one who restarted the trolling on this thread, deal with it yourself.
 
.
You might want to tell your boy to control his own anti-US attitude. And get his facts straight.

I hope you do not forget the U.S. peanut butter. Each country has a quality problem, U.s too.
 
.
I find it hard to sympathise with you gambit,...
Your sympathy is meaningless to me.

...when you have clearly shown that you are a racist towards Chinese people.



Racism: Negative stereotypes based on race.
You might want to read that in the proper context. I said 'May be' and that was in response to a comment that generalized all Americans. But that is fine, really...
 
.
How was your ranting about swine flu relevant to a thread about poultry tariffs?

You're the one who restarted the trolling here after everyone had stopped.

Cos it hurt even to a self-hated ......,at the end of the day, he know very well where he really belong.:D

On topic, good move after all those unreasonable tariff US imposed on Chinese products like tires which US co. don't even produce anymore.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom