What's new

China: Hiding Your Strength and Biding Your Time

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
China: Hiding Your Strength and Biding Your Time

APEC Summit reflections on China’s impressive policy and reform path.

By Kenneth Courtis, November 10, 2014

China has been on a veritable roll these last few months.

China’s relations with Vietnam are on the mend – and with Iran they are booming.
The Chinese execute the playbook of macroeconomic reforms very well and with great determination.

At a time when Europe’s economy is in bad shape and U.S. President Barack Obama has been taken to the cleaners by voters, it is more than useful for Western minds to look at China.

China has been on a veritable roll these last few months. The BRICS bank is off the ground. Despite misguided U.S. efforts to derail the initiative, the AIIB is launched with 20 founding members. Others will surely join over time.

China, the emerging market leader

In the energy sector, as a follow-up to the grand natural gas deal with Russia concluded a few months back, over the weekend, China and Russia have announced another massive deal, which means that by 2020, Russia will supply more natural gas to China than it supplies today to Western Europe.

Similar to these two agreements are several other energy related deals, including the doubling of Russia’s oil exports to China.

At the same time, China’s links to Central Asia have become tighter. For example, Beijing has just launched the Silk Road Investment Fund, a new $40 billion fund which will focus on investments in the seven countries of Central Asia.

China’s relations with Vietnam are on the mend – and with Iran they are booming. China has managed even to open a dialogue of sorts with Japan.

Add to that the new Silk Road Fund and you have the outline of a number of important initiatives which will be key to China’s increased lead role in development through investment in other emerging market economies.

This is not to say that China is without challenges. It has plenty of them domestically. But even here, important changes are underway.

China gets macro

Think, for example, how power producers have finally been forced everywhere around the country to reduce pollution. The laws to do so have been long on the books, but in the past 12 months they have started to be enforced – and enforced with authority.

In that process, the growth of heavy industry – one of the biggest legacies of Mao’s economy – has been slowed dramatically. There has been a complete clamp down in opening new steel, zinc and aluminum production capacity, to name but those.

That, in turn, is leading to more and more focus on the consumer sector of the economy, which continues substantially to outpace overall economic growth.

In short, the Chinese execute the playbook of macroeconomic reforms very well and with great determination.

Corruption, the real pocketbook issue

China has also engaged a broad-based campaign against corruption. Cutting through the crippling issues of corruption is critical to releasing and implementing large-scale economic and social reforms.

Energy is key to the economy, and that is why this sector has been a key focus of the anti-corruption effort.

Surely more is to come, as we are seeing recently with the developments surrounding the State Grid. Several management people at the top of State Grid in Shanghai and Southern China are said now “to be assisting the authorities with investigations.” State Grid controls much of the production of power, and all its transmission and distribution across the entire country.

Reflecting its vast size and political and economic power, some call the State Grid a state within a state. I expect that you will see in the months ahead a loosening of the generator-transmission-distribution iron triangle in China’s power sector.

Indeed, there are already developments along these lines in Guangdong. The result I expect is that we will see the costs of electricity prices fall in a number of sectors of the country. Attacking corruption in the railway sector seems to have been a key factor in dropping domestic coal prices, for example.

Get The Globalist’s latest headlines in your email inbox three times a week. Sign up here.
At the APEC Summit, President Xi mentioned that 7% growth or so would keep China among the top performers in the world. This year, China will provide about 40% of total world growth.

As if that weren’t enough of a global boost, China does more. It is supplying growth to many other nations through the reduction in its net exports – or, put another way, through the surge in its imports.

In 2006, China’s net exports amounted to 10.4% of GDP. This year, they will be about 2.4% of GDP. No other major economy has achieved that type of major re-balancing in the past decade.

Next steps

When you are an $11 trillion economy, as China is today, and growing at 7% annually, “hiding your strength” is not as easy to do when your economy was 1/25th the size, as it was a quarter of a century ago.

Likewise, the concept of “biding your time” – long China’s diplomatic preference on the global stage – is not as easy to accomplish when the major powers are fading.

The United States and Europe, in various ways, may still control much of the world economic and political institutional structure, as they have done for the past century and more. But their inaction and lack of planned achievements speak loud and clear.

The United States’ and Europe’s collective failing is that they do not work to accommodate the interests of China and other large emerging economies in any way that is commensurate with their new weight and position in the global economic, financial and political balance.

As exhibit number one, consider the rather desperate rearguard action the U.S. government has been fighting with regard to convincing Asian nations to stay outside of the new Asian infrastructure bank.

Then there is the by now “classic” issue: Major reforms of the IMF, including a redistribution of the IMF quota-based voting system, are simply not happening.

You can’t have it both ways. On one hand, say to the Chinese that you support reform of the IMF, as both the United States and Europe do. On the other hand, do very little to make such reforms happen, and then complain and obstruct while China, frustrated, takes new initiatives and plays an increasingly larger leadership role outside of these institutions.

U.S. aggressiveness bites back

Consider also the – perhaps unintended – consequences of the aggressive use of extra-territoriality by the United States in law enforcement. Its zealous and very one-sided approach is creating a vast interest in Europe, and throughout the emerging world, in an additional world reserve currency.

The $8.9 billion fine imposed on France’s BNP and the sanctions on Russia, which are now destabilizing all of the CIS countries, have been the major catalysts in this regard.

The RMB and the Euro are the only other logical candidates to being global reserve currencies. Traveling in East Africa, I was struck at how street vendors, taxis, restaurants were indifferent whether one offered RMB, USD or Euros as payment. A tiny example, but not an insignificant one.

Part of China’s broader reform agenda in this regard is the internationalization of the currency and the opening of the capital account. The West has been urging China to do this for years.

This will also make China a dramatically more important player in global trade and finance. And as we are now seeing – should anyone be surprised? – that participation will be increasingly on China’s own terms.

These developments are not about China suddenly becoming more aggressive on the international stage. Rather, they are essential transitions which are part of the next stage of China’s growth and development.

However you look at it, China’s rise is with us. It is not going to go away. It is central to the new global reality.

Kenneth S. Courtis is chairman of Starfort Holdings and managing partner of Courtis Global & Associates.

China: Hiding Your Strength and Biding Your Time - The Globalist

@Chinese-Dragon , @Edison Chen , @tranquilium , @Keel , @Genesis , @Raphael et al.
 
.
No need to hide. Now it time to show strength. China needs to shown strength to convince more countries to side us.

You don't allies with countries of yesterday ( US, Japan)

You join country of future.(China)
 
.
No need to hide. Now it time to show strength. China needs to shown strength to convince more countries to side us.

You don't allies with countries of yesterday ( US, Japan)

You join country of future.(China)

Nonetheless, most of the talking is still being done in the West. I guess China should not be in a hurry to win the hearts and minds of others. Just let that happen in its natural course, and by solid foreign policy, rather than excessive use of words.
 
.
Nonetheless, most of the talking is still being done in the West. I guess China should not be in a hurry to win the hearts and minds of others. Just let that happen in its natural course, and by solid foreign policy, rather than excessive use of words.

Join the Chinese camp and rein in the benefit. Especially for developing countries. You need expertise, investment to develop the countries. China assist can multiple effective result without a huge budget. But some countries are just to naive not to see it. Western countries loan is always full of condition. Their expertise is too costly for any developing countries to utilize.
 
.
In 2006, China’s net exports amounted to 10.4% of GDP. This year, they will be about 2.4% of GDP. No other major economy has achieved that type of major re-balancing in the past decade.

And they call China export-dependent and not taking enough responsibility!

China is feeding the world already, for God's sake.
 
.
This year, China will provide about 40% of total world growth.

As if that weren’t enough of a global boost, China does more. It is supplying growth to many other nations through the reduction in its net exports – or, put another way, through the surge in its imports.

Wow, we supply 40% of the world's total growth. :cheesy:

Anyway, it seems the Chinese government is still following Deng Xiaoping's advice:

China Doesn’t Want to Be Number One | The Diplomat

Last week, international media had a field day over the news that, based on a new World Bank report, China’s economy will be the world’s largest in terms of purchasing parity power (PPP) by the end of 2014. Yet China itself did not embrace the news. The World Bank noted in its report that China’s National Bureau of Statistics had refuted the methodology used and refused to endorse the report. In addition, China’s state-owned media were largely silent about the data and its implications.

Now, a report from Financial Times suggests China’s unease goes much deeper. FT, citing people who worked on the World Bank report, says that China actively tried to convince them not to use the data. “China wanted to throw this out,” a source told FT. “They begged and threatened for a whole year … China hates it.”

It might seem counterintuitive that China would want to quash a report highlighting its economic prowess. FT’s sources all agreed on the motive behind China’s reluctance: Beijing does not want the increased international pressure that would come from being the number one economy.

I trust they will know when to follow such advice, and when to forge their own path.
 
. .
And sure it must for the next couple of decades, at least. Nothing short of a 50trillion USD GDP is acceptable.

I have no doubt our people can achieve that one day. :tup:

It seems inevitable to me that the GDP per capita of the Mainland, would eventually converge with that of Hong Kong, Singapore, and Macau. I know a lot of Mainlanders personally, and they are more driven than even the old generation of Hong Kongers.

And imagine the defence budget we would have at that point. :smitten:That would beggar belief, it would be higher than even America's at the very apex of their defense spending.
 
.
I have no doubt our people can achieve that one day. :tup:

It seems inevitable to me that the GDP per capita of the Mainland, would eventually converge with that of Hong Kong, Singapore, and Macau. I know a lot of Mainlanders personally, and they are more driven than even the old generation of Hong Kongers.

And imagine the defence budget we would have at that point. :smitten:That would beggar belief, it would be higher than even America's at the very apex of their defense spending.

So long as China reaches a certain level of economic welfare, I am all for spending big on military while at the same time making strong connection between military research and civilian research, so that advanced military technologies would also be marketed as civil technology and contribute to economy.
 
.
The United States’ and Europe’s collective failing is that they do not work to accommodate the interests of China and other large emerging economies in any way that is commensurate with their new weight and position in the global economic, financial and political balance.

They are absolutely uncapable of such thing.Talks are one thing,but actions speaks louder.And actions of US/EU speaks enough for their true intention-fight to the end to remain on the top.They will do anything to stop rise of China/Russia/BRICS or any other competitor.Expect more wars/colour revolutions/more printing/more market manipulation/more suffering inflicted at the people around planet.USA and vassals will fight to the very bitter end.And it is already clear who is winner here.While West engages in wars BRICS engage in cooperation,while West engages in colour revolutions BRICS threat each others and their partners as equals and with respect.West "help"comes with lots of strings attached at the expense of population and country national interests.South America,Africa(despite never ending meddling of certain countries),Middle Asia(good job :-) China and Russia kicking out Uncle Sam out) already made their choice.More and more countries will switch side even ällies"in Gulf and EU in near future.Choice between wars and austerity or prosperity. One by one countries will choose side of prosperity.
 
.
The United States’ and Europe’s collective failing is that they do not work to accommodate the interests of China and other large emerging economies in any way that is commensurate with their new weight and position in the global economic, financial and political balance.

They are absolutely uncapable of such thing.Talks are one thing,but actions speaks louder.And actions of US/EU speaks enough for their true intention-fight to the end to remain on the top.They will do anything to stop rise of China/Russia/BRICS or any other competitor.Expect more wars/colour revolutions/more printing/more market manipulation/more suffering inflicted at the people around planet.USA and vassals will fight to the very bitter end.And it is already clear who is winner here.While West engages in wars BRICS engage in cooperation,while West engages in colour revolutions BRICS threat each others and their partners as equals and with respect.West "help"comes with lots of strings attached at the expense of population and country national interests.South America,Africa(despite never ending meddling of certain countries),Middle Asia(good job :-) China and Russia kicking out Uncle Sam out) already made their choice.More and more countries will switch side even ällies"in Gulf and EU in near future.Choice between wars and austerity or prosperity. One by one countries will choose side of prosperity.
The problem with this old Europe and American is their growth is tied to China too. Who buy most of Europe high tech machine? China. Who buy most of Boeing aircraft? China. They try to stop China growth but it will hurt their growth too. Those old fools are in a dilemma of how to prevent China overtaking them. :lol:

Deng Xiao Ping brilliantly set a trap for those western to step in. It's also western greed that make them today in such situation.
 
Last edited:
.
The world is intertwined and no-one is going completely independent on its own
So american's strategy of containing China is stupid and that has in many ways jumpstarted the strengthening of our defence strategies like spending more on R and D in weaponry of various kinds in conventional hardware, space, internet, charting new energy supply routes, getting us closer to countries who oppose the American policies
Who is going to take China's place for consuming the American products like automobiles as an example?
If the Americans think they can suceed in defeating us, they are hurting themselves too in a much bigger way than they can imagine :dirol:
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom