What's new

China criticizes US double standards on terrorism

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
China criticizes US double standards on terrorism
December 24, 2015

China on Wednesday rejected US criticism against its draft law on terrorism and urged Washington to refrain from applying "double standards" in fighting terrorism.

7427ea210acc17e5861607.jpg
Police seize a simulated gangster during an emergency drill in Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, earlier this month. The scenario involved a female audience member at a sports event who was kidnapped by two gangsters with knives.[Photo/China Daily]

"We hope the United States will stop groundless accusations and respect China's law-making processes," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei told a regular press briefing.

He was responding to a question regarding a statement by the US State Department expressing concern over the draft.

Increasing terrorist attacks have posed serious threats to China's national security and the life and property of its people, China's legislation on terrorism is completely necessary to prevent and crack down on terrorism, Hong said.

He stressed that fighting terrorism itself is part of the efforts to protect human rights, and that the Chinese government attaches importance to striking a balance between anti-terrorism measures and protection of human rights.

The spokesman pointed out that as Internet is frequently used by terrorists in planning and conducting attacks, countries including the United States enacted laws obligating Internet operators and service providers to providing assistance to law enforcement agencies.

Similar items in China's draft anti-terrorism law is completely reasonable and will not constitute a breach of corporate intellectual property rights or citizens' freedom of speech, Hong said.

***

US is a fascist (extreme corporatist/right wing) regime. Hence they will not uphold any moral values, nor will they respect historical/scientific truth. Just as they have done in Syria with respect to their affection towards armed foreign militia that fight to topple the government of the country, they will keep providing political support and logistical support to violent anti-China groups nestled in the overseas.
 
.
China criticizes US double standards on terrorism
December 24, 2015

China on Wednesday rejected US criticism against its draft law on terrorism and urged Washington to refrain from applying "double standards" in fighting terrorism.

7427ea210acc17e5861607.jpg
Police seize a simulated gangster during an emergency drill in Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, earlier this month. The scenario involved a female audience member at a sports event who was kidnapped by two gangsters with knives.[Photo/China Daily]

"We hope the United States will stop groundless accusations and respect China's law-making processes," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei told a regular press briefing.

He was responding to a question regarding a statement by the US State Department expressing concern over the draft.

Increasing terrorist attacks have posed serious threats to China's national security and the life and property of its people, China's legislation on terrorism is completely necessary to prevent and crack down on terrorism, Hong said.

He stressed that fighting terrorism itself is part of the efforts to protect human rights, and that the Chinese government attaches importance to striking a balance between anti-terrorism measures and protection of human rights.

The spokesman pointed out that as Internet is frequently used by terrorists in planning and conducting attacks, countries including the United States enacted laws obligating Internet operators and service providers to providing assistance to law enforcement agencies.

Similar items in China's draft anti-terrorism law is completely reasonable and will not constitute a breach of corporate intellectual property rights or citizens' freedom of speech, Hong said.

***

US is a fascist (extreme corporatist/right wing) regime. Hence they will not uphold any moral values, nor will they respect historical/scientific truth. Just as they have done in Syria with respect to their affection towards armed foreign militia that fight to topple the government of the country, they will keep providing political support and logistical support to violent anti-China groups nestled in the overseas.
I am still not happy with china roll reagarding USA, look how USA is teasing china at every opportunity they get.China should expose the role of USA in terrorism
 
. .
Can someone point to the criticism the US supposedly made of this law?
I don't see anything mentioned about it.
 
. . .
China criticizes US double standards on terrorism
December 24, 2015

China on Wednesday rejected US criticism against its draft law on terrorism and urged Washington to refrain from applying "double standards" in fighting terrorism.

7427ea210acc17e5861607.jpg
Police seize a simulated gangster during an emergency drill in Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, earlier this month. The scenario involved a female audience member at a sports event who was kidnapped by two gangsters with knives.[Photo/China Daily]

"We hope the United States will stop groundless accusations and respect China's law-making processes," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei told a regular press briefing.

He was responding to a question regarding a statement by the US State Department expressing concern over the draft.

Increasing terrorist attacks have posed serious threats to China's national security and the life and property of its people, China's legislation on terrorism is completely necessary to prevent and crack down on terrorism, Hong said.

He stressed that fighting terrorism itself is part of the efforts to protect human rights, and that the Chinese government attaches importance to striking a balance between anti-terrorism measures and protection of human rights.

The spokesman pointed out that as Internet is frequently used by terrorists in planning and conducting attacks, countries including the United States enacted laws obligating Internet operators and service providers to providing assistance to law enforcement agencies.

Similar items in China's draft anti-terrorism law is completely reasonable and will not constitute a breach of corporate intellectual property rights or citizens' freedom of speech, Hong said.

***

US is a fascist (extreme corporatist/right wing) regime. Hence they will not uphold any moral values, nor will they respect historical/scientific truth. Just as they have done in Syria with respect to their affection towards armed foreign militia that fight to topple the government of the country, they will keep providing political support and logistical support to violent anti-China groups nestled in the overseas.
2005-02-02-2005-2-1-manhua-1.jpg
 
.
Can someone point to the criticism the US supposedly made of this law?
I don't see anything mentioned about it.

You won't, because this is yet another Chinese Babbling about something, same as any "Warning" system they had over the years....



US is a fascist (extreme corporatist/right wing) regime. Hence they will not uphold any moral values, nor will they respect historical/scientific truth. Just as they have done in Syria with respect to their affection towards armed foreign militia that fight to topple the government of the country, they will keep providing political support and logistical support to violent anti-China groups nestled in the overseas.

In case you are wondering why a negative rating is left, the highlighted (Bolded) part are an implication on a generalization on all American or America are/is immoral.
 
.
China criticizes US double standards on terrorism
December 24, 2015

China on Wednesday rejected US criticism against its draft law on terrorism and urged Washington to refrain from applying "double standards" in fighting terrorism.

7427ea210acc17e5861607.jpg
Police seize a simulated gangster during an emergency drill in Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, earlier this month. The scenario involved a female audience member at a sports event who was kidnapped by two gangsters with knives.[Photo/China Daily]

"We hope the United States will stop groundless accusations and respect China's law-making processes," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei told a regular press briefing.

He was responding to a question regarding a statement by the US State Department expressing concern over the draft.

Increasing terrorist attacks have posed serious threats to China's national security and the life and property of its people, China's legislation on terrorism is completely necessary to prevent and crack down on terrorism, Hong said.

He stressed that fighting terrorism itself is part of the efforts to protect human rights, and that the Chinese government attaches importance to striking a balance between anti-terrorism measures and protection of human rights.

The spokesman pointed out that as Internet is frequently used by terrorists in planning and conducting attacks, countries including the United States enacted laws obligating Internet operators and service providers to providing assistance to law enforcement agencies.

Similar items in China's draft anti-terrorism law is completely reasonable and will not constitute a breach of corporate intellectual property rights or citizens' freedom of speech, Hong said.

***

US is a fascist (extreme corporatist/right wing) regime. Hence they will not uphold any moral values, nor will they respect historical/scientific truth. Just as they have done in Syria with respect to their affection towards armed foreign militia that fight to topple the government of the country, they will keep providing political support and logistical support to violent anti-China groups nestled in the overseas.

America is beyond a fascist regime. It's a terror regime that funds and arms terrorists all over the world for geopolitical purposes. The Nazi regime was a fascist regime, the American regime is far more evil than the Nazi regime.

China must ban ALL American NGOs and ban ALL American propaganda mouthpieces such as New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal and others from Mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau.

If any American company that refuses to obey Chinese laws, just ban them from China. It's very simple. You don't comply with Chinese law, you don't do business with China. Domestic companies will take over and protect Chinese national interests.

China has tolerated that despotic American regime far enough.
 
.
I always find it ironic when China talks about human rights .
Even more ironically is that in Indian lower caste beings are not regarded as "humans", so there's no need of any rights for them

There are currently 795 million people hungry people on earth. India itself is home to the largest under-nourished and hungry population, with 195 million people going hungry every day. Though women make up a little over half of the world’s population, they account for 60% of the world’s hungry. In India, the nutrition of children is particularly worse because of the state of their mothers. 36 percent of Indian women are chronically under-nourished. over half a million children die in India before their fifth birthday because of severe acute malnutrition, according to the Indian Academy of Paediatrics. One child dies every minute.

You should first struggle to become a human and stay alive.
 
.
US is a fascist (extreme corporatist/right wing) regime. Hence they will not uphold any moral values, nor will they respect historical/scientific truth. Just as they have done in Syria with respect to their affection towards armed foreign militia that fight to topple the government of the country, they will keep providing political support and logistical support to violent anti-China groups nestled in the overseas.

aptly stated and I concur.
 
.
U.S. shows insincerity in fighting terrorism by smearing China's anti-terrorism law
Xinhua 2015-12-25 14:50

On Christmas Eve, U.S. embassy in China issued security warnings for Westerners in Beijing's Sanlitun area, a popular Beijing diplomatic and entertainment district. Thanks to special forces dispatched by the Chinese government, no incidents or injuries have taken place so far.

To address the increasing terrorist activities inside and outside its border as well as in cyberspace, China has pushed forward its first counter-terrorism law with great urgency to establish a systematic and effective anti-terror platform.

However, Beijing's resolution to support the global anti-terror efforts has been slandered by Washington as a move that "would do more harm than good in addressing the threat of terrorism" and "lead to greater restrictions" on freedom of expression, association, peaceful assembly and religion within China.

It is indeed an expected response from Washington, which simply cannot stop from taking China as a bogeyman in super hero movies and fictions that always has an evil motive.

It is regrettable that even at this critical moment when rampant terrorism and extremism across the world have embroiled countries and regions in deadly conflicts, Uncle Sam is unable to view China's anti-terror measures without habitual suspicion, bias and selfishness.

It also shows the United States' insincerity and incapability in consolidating global efforts to fight terrorism.

Practicing partisan politics on the world stage, dividing countries into allies and enemies judging by its self-interest and ideology, guided by a zero-sum game and double-standard mind, the United States bears unshakable responsibilities for instability in the Middle East, the refugee crisis in Europe and other escalating regional tensions.

By elevating freedom of expression to an absolute right without boundaries, Washington in fact connives at influential parties to coerce and harass disadvantaged groups by using speeches as weapons.

U.S. Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump's remarks about barring Muslims from entering the country instigate discrimination and hatred, isolate the Muslim population and undermine the freedom of religion.

The West's long holding of global discourse hegemony revealed its hypocrisy when Western media paid surprisingly disproportionate attention to the terrorist attacks in Paris and in Beirut in November.

What is the purpose of press freedom if it is a freedom to choose whose lives are more valuable than others?

Some Western governments and media refused to call China's Kunming rail station attackers "terrorists" even though they brutally stabbed 31 innocent people to death and injured 141, while wasted no time to label a London attacker "terrorist," as he stabbed one British soldier to death and waited with bystanders for police to arrest him.

The coldblooedness over the third world countries' people's lives is shocking and should be a wake-up call to the world that the West does not always stand on the moral high ground, and that press freedom has been often used as a tool to protect discourse hegemony.

It is always the innocent people that fall victim to terrorism and extremism, and that is why the Chinese government is taking concrete actions to protect its people, including ordinary Americans enjoying Christmas in Beijing's Sanlitun.

But when can the United States stop considering China as an imaginary enemy and start aiming at the real enemy -- terrorism?
 
. .
You won't, because this is yet another Chinese Babbling about something, same as any "Warning" system they had over the years....

In case you are wondering why a negative rating is left, the highlighted (Bolded) part are an implication on a generalization on all American or America are/is immoral.

Ah so much sensitivity which does not impress me. Work harder.

The generalization is on the US regime, read again to comprehend. I like to use plural pronoun "they" when I refer to the US because I like to think of the US as an amalgamation of various elite interests. So, for me, it is the US regime that is entirely fascist (extreme right wing) and it is them in plural.

I do not care about regular people as they are not my concern.

Now kindly get lost.

America is beyond a fascist regime. It's a terror regime that funds and arms terrorists all over the world for geopolitical purposes. The Nazi regime was a fascist regime, the American regime is far more evil than the Nazi regime.

China must ban ALL American NGOs and ban ALL American propaganda mouthpieces such as New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal and others from Mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau.

If any American company that refuses to obey Chinese laws, just ban them from China. It's very simple. You don't comply with Chinese law, you don't do business with China. Domestic companies will take over and protect Chinese national interests.

China has tolerated that despotic American regime far enough.

US regime is ruthless and warmongering fascist state. It is not representative of the millions of US civilians that are directly (being sent to wars to pay, at times, college debt) or indirectly (economic repercussions, war syndromes) victims of this bloody regime whose history is a history of war, intervention and deception.

As a rule, China treats the US regime as at least suspects. There is no trust, believe me. Whatever there is, it is cold peace and business-mentality. China has shown various US companies the road to exit because they did not obey the law of nation. Hence the difference between Google and Bing China. The greater the national power, the greater capability to ensure absolute national sovereignty.

China will incrementally be more attentive to its most distant national interests.

It seems we have different views about "humans", People can clear see how humans living a China and how humans living in India. India is the worst place for being a human . if you were a cow, rat or a monkey, you have a better chance of success in India cause they are Holy. but if you are just a human there, sorry, tough luck.

Well said. The surprising thing is why the Indian here decided to be an Indian and involv in the topic by derailing it although it had nothing to do with Indians or India. Report the Indians of this kind and ignore. They will slowly disappear.

However, Beijing's resolution to support the global anti-terror efforts has been slandered by Washington as a move that "would do more harm than good in addressing the threat of terrorism" and "lead to greater restrictions" on freedom of expression, association, peaceful assembly and religion within China.

The fascist (extreme right wing) regime in the US should firstly account for its own draconian anti-terrorism laws before criticizing China for finally taking steps to address the issue of terrorism. The general feeling is that China has already been late and more measures and stricter laws must be adopted. Why the US has the liberty to have the kinds of Trump, why would a basic introductory law be criticized.

Practicing partisan politics on the world stage, dividing countries into allies and enemies judging by its self-interest and ideology, guided by a zero-sum game and double-standard mind, the United States bears unshakable responsibilities for instability in the Middle East, the refugee crisis in Europe and other escalating regional tensions.

Well put. Very historical analysis.

Some Western governments and media refused to call China's Kunming rail station attackers "terrorists" even though they brutally stabbed 31 innocent people to death and injured 141, while wasted no time to label a London attacker "terrorist," as he stabbed one British soldier to death and waited with bystanders for police to arrest him.

Excellent observation. That's fascism right there. A fascist regime is a fascist regime until someone comes up and puts it to the place it deserves.
 
.
Ah so much sensitivity which does not impress me. Work harder.

The generalization is on the US regime, read again to comprehend. I like to use plural pronoun "they" when I refer to the US because I like to think of the US as an amalgamation of various elite interests. So, for me, it is the US regime that is entirely fascist (extreme right wing) and it is them in plural.

I do not care about regular people as they are not my concern.

Now kindly get lost.
.

It's not nice to tell other get lost. I meanI would not even tell my dog to get lost, and you are using it on a person.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom