What's new

China - best of BRICS in Global Competitiveness Ranking WEF - 2013-14

shuttler

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
9,253
Reaction score
3
Country
China
Location
China
China leads BRICS in global competitiveness ranking
(People's Daily Online) 17:03, September 06, 2013

People's Daily.com.cn

Among the BRICS economies, China has maintained 29th place in the Global Competitiveness Report 2013-2014, unchanged from last year, and ahead of South Africa (53rd), Brazil (56th), India (60th) and Russia (64th), and the gap between China and India has widened from eight places in 2006 to 31, the World Economic Forum (WEF) announced on Wednesday in Geneva.

China's presence in the top 30 is a quite remarkable achievement

Professor Chen Jiangsheng, Director of the research institute of world economy at the Party School of the CPC Central Committee, explains the reasons for the growing gap between China and India. The Indian economy performed well from 1991 to 2007, but was greatly impacted by the world economic crisis in 2007 and has remained sluggish since then. The Chinese economy on the other hand has maintained its momentum since 2007, despite some setbacks.

"For such a big economy, and given the stage of development, a presence in the top 30, is a quite remarkable achievement," said Thierry Geiger, the economist with the WEF who is in charge of the Asia section of the report. In order to maintain and improve its competitiveness, China now needs to focus on more sophisticated factors, such as high levels of education, market efficiency, and adoption of technology, he added.

He attached special weight to market efficiency, saying that China needs to develop the private sector, create a more level playing field for small- and medium-sized enterprises, and provide better access to credit for those companies.

Since 1979, the WEF has released the Global Competitiveness Report every year. Its competitiveness ranking is based on the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI), calculated by drawing together data covering 12 categories, namely institutions, innovation, macroeconomic environment, health and primary education, higher education and training, manufacturing market efficiency, labor market efficiency, financial market development, technological maturity, market size, business sophistication, and innovation.

Innovation the key ingredient in an economy's ability to prosper

Klaus Schwab, WEF founder and executive chairman, stressed the role of innovation. "I predict that the traditional distinction between countries being 'developed' or 'less developed' will gradually disappear," he said. "We will instead refer to them much more in terms of being "innovation rich" versus "innovation poor". He believes that innovation is increasingly the key ingredient in an economy's ability to prosper.

Switzerland tops the overall rankings of 148 economies in the report, followed by Singapore and Finland, Germany moved up two notches to 4th place and the United States reversed a four-year downward trend, rising two places to 5th. Sweden (6th), the Netherlands (8th) and the UK (10th) all dropped places. Two other Asian economies, China's Hong Kong SAR (7th), and Japan (9th), feature in the top 10 of the rankings.

On the question why small countries like Switzerland, Singapore and Finland are among the top rankings, Chen Jiangsheng explained that it is because the report is based not on economic output, but on the efficiency of government, market environment, innovation, and anti-corruption efforts. And these small countries have an advantage in such areas.

Polarization in Asian countries a serious problem

The report also shows that polarization in Asian counties is a serious problem. Some of the least competitive economies belong to Asia, such as Bangladesh (110th), Nepal (117th) and Pakistan (133rd). The ranking of Pakistan has dropped for three years in a row. And Bhutan (109th), Laos (81st) and Myanmar (139th) are included in the rankings for the first time.

The report concluded that in Europe, efforts to tackle public debt and avoid a breakup of the Euro zone have taken the focus away from addressing deeper issues of competitiveness. It further noted that in order to help bridge the region's competitiveness divide, Southern European economies such as Spain (35th), Italy (49th), Portugal (51st) and notably Greece (91st) all need to continue addressing weaknesses in the function and efficiency of their markets, boost innovation, and improve access to finance.

In Latin America, the report pointed out that despite robust economic growth in previous years, the region continues to suffer from low rates of productivity and the results show overall stagnation in competitiveness. Chile (34th) continues to lead the regional rankings ahead of Panama (40th), Costa Rica (54th) and Mexico (55th), which all remain relatively stable.
(Editor:LiangJun、Yao Chun)



Hereunder is the link to the report:

WEF_Global Competitiveness Report_2013-14.pdf
 
"For such a big economy, and given the stage of development, a presence in the top 30, is a quite remarkable achievement," said Thierry Geiger, the economist with the WEF who is in charge of the Asia section of the report. In order to maintain and improve its competitiveness, China now needs to focus on more sophisticated factors, such as high levels of education, market efficiency, and adoption of technology, he added.

Absolutely right. :tup:

We have the largest population in the world, one of the largest land-areas in the world, and we are still a developing country.

Given all that, the fact that we are in the top 30 in terms of competitiveness is very remarkable. Especially when smaller countries tend to dominate this list because they are easier to administer.
 
let's not beat a man who's down. I think at this point the competition is all but over. China's more advanced than BRICS countries is all but confirmed and unchallenged.

We should focus instead on catching up to the US and all our comparisons should be with them.
 
let's not beat a man who's down. I think at this point the competition is all but over. China's more advanced than BRICS countries is all but confirmed and unchallenged.

We should focus instead on catching up to the US and all our comparisons should be with them.

Who is beating whom? It is a just report which is done by an economic evaluation.
We have our own path of development and I have not seen anyone saying we can match the development of the best US cities by a certain date
 
let's not beat a man who's down. I think at this point the competition is all but over. China's more advanced than BRICS countries is all but confirmed and unchallenged.

We should focus instead on catching up to the US and all our comparisons should be with them.

to do that, we need a stable regional environment, we simply can't have the compeition with the US when some loser nations such as Vietnam and india doing nasty things on our back.

we can pick out one, beat it to death to give out some clear signal to the region. Vietnam is a good choice for that. 300 CJ-10 missiles can achieve that.
 
None of the other members of the BRICS will ever touch China. The only competition we have right now is the US. We are ahead of everyone else in most areas.
 
Who is beating whom? It is a just report which is done by an economic evaluation.
We have our own path of development and I have not seen anyone saying we can match the development of the best US cities by a certain date

I have also never seen anyone who says we will be the second largest economy and soon surpass America before 2000, and yet here we are.
 
I think China has more cash than the rest of the BRICS put together. The gap will only increase as China's growth rate is outpacing the rest. However, we need to keep in mind that on a per capita basis, we still have a long way to go.
 
I have also never seen anyone who says we will be the second largest economy and soon surpass America before 2000, and yet here we are.

I think the big wigs at each of the National People's Congress are setting target for a GDP growth rate for the coming year and from there we have been moving on year on year, one step at a time.

We should not be overtly complacent about the progress as we still have tons of issues to tackle.

It is a good sign however they are focusing more on quality for growth but lets see how it goes
 
to do that, we need a stable regional environment, we simply can't have the compeition with the US when some loser nations such as Vietnam and india doing nasty things on our back.

we can pick out one, beat it to death to give out some clear signal to the region. Vietnam is a good choice for that. 300 CJ-10 missiles can achieve that.

Why bother?, just block red river 红河 for few days, then these people will crawl back to Beijing begging for pardons and accept to be the tributary state as the way it was. :lol:
 
So,i wouldnt call it a BRIC country anymore.
I always think BRICS should be called BRIS + China instead. However on a per capita basis we're still quite behind. Despite being the world's largest manufacturing base, China is still a third world developing country.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom