What's new

China and Pakistan behind Nepal's move to usurp Indian territory: Sources

it was very funny but i heard it by an indian analyst who were saying Pakistan and india is same, same people same blood line if we been fighting from 70 years so what but we are one, but why China wants to become father of this conflict and not baby nepal wants to slap us lol.
 
.
I am not talking about what Nepal will achieve or not. but that land is theirs and India has no right over it. The Map was approved by whole house not a single vote against it so tell me where is pro India voices in Nepal. The British took the land and you took it from British Gorkas are Nepali they are not Indian. facts are facts.

India is only extending the colonial borders of past & agenda. Today world has changed look at west they are throwing down statues of colonialism on which entire Indian agenda is based. The core of India argument is being destroyed & the reality is coming to life.

There was no Pakistan... Balochistan, Afghanistan and Sikh Empire's Punjab... These COLONIAL BRITISHERS took these lands during various MILITARY missions and handed over to the NAWABS FROM AWADH... to satisfy their EGO of being elite rulers...

Pakistan is only redrawing of the colonial borders of past & agenda. Today world has changed look at west they are throwing down statues of colonialism on which entire Pakistan agenda is based. The core of Pakistan argument is being destroyed & the reality is coming to life.

@GHALIB am I missing anything else...
 
.
There was no Pakistan... Balochistan, Afghanistan and Sikh Empire's Punjab... These COLONIAL BRITISHERS took these lands during various MILITARY missions and handed over to the NAWABS FROM AWADH... to satisfy their EGO of being elite rulers...

Pakistan is only redrawing of the colonial borders of past & agenda. Today world has changed look at west they are throwing down statues of colonialism on which entire Pakistan agenda is based. The core of Pakistan argument is being destroyed & the reality is coming to life.

@GHALIB am I missing anything else...
Pakistan in subcontinent represents a Muslim Govt the same Govt which existed before British that is Mugals which was also a muslim govt. The so called India has no past roots. Similarly before British the empire of Nepal existed. The thread is Nepal so lets stick to it. Give counter argument on Nepal rather than Pakistan, cause I am from Pakistan so you decided to attack Pakistan rather than addressing the issue at hand.
 
.
There was no Pakistan... Balochistan, Afghanistan and Sikh Empire's Punjab... These COLONIAL BRITISHERS took these lands during various MILITARY missions and handed over to the NAWABS FROM AWADH... to satisfy their EGO of being elite rulers...

Pakistan is only redrawing of the colonial borders of past & agenda. Today world has changed look at west they are throwing down statues of colonialism on which entire Pakistan agenda is based. The core of Pakistan argument is being destroyed & the reality is coming to life.

@GHALIB am I missing anything else...




By that definition, there is no justifiable reason for india to exist as the notion of a "united india" ended forever on August the 14th 1947.
 
.
In a shocking revelation, it has been found that China and Pakistan have been instigating Nepal to take action against India.

According to sources close to Zee News, ......

Are you serious ?

Why is it coming as a shock ?

Everyone knows that India is experiencing a painful double penetration. And it's going to be a long session.

Nepal just entered to give her a facial while the titti-twisters will come from indigenous armed separatist movements.

I'm just going to sit back and enjoy this **** movie (missing the popcorn smiley)
 
.
Pakistan in subcontinent represents a Muslim Govt the same Govt which existed before British that is Mugals which was also a muslim govt. The so called India has no past roots. Similarly before British the empire of Nepal existed. The thread is Nepal so lets stick to it. Give counter argument on Nepal rather than Pakistan, cause I am from Pakistan so you decided to attack Pakistan rather than addressing the issue at hand.

Whatever suits better... but the bitter truth is that no border is permanent... after 50 years there could be no Pakistan or India... who knows... Baluchistan, Greater Afghanistan, Khalistan, Marathas and what not...

On topic... Greater Nepal or Akhand Bharat... Military and economic might is needed... drawing Maps is not going to change the situation...
Oli is a communist... and under heavy influence of China... he is also rejecting the US aids and investments... lets see how long he can be a democratically elected PM... Bangladesh and Maldives are great examples of India and its capabilities... do not feel good for Chinese deeds...

By that definition, there is no justifiable reason for india to exist as the notion of a "united india" ended forever on August the 14th 1947.

There was no justifiable reason for Pakistan too before 1947... and whatever little reason was concatenated... ended in 1971... whatever little delusion which is remaining now... might end after creation of Baluchistan in near future... who knows...

MIGHT IS RIGHT...
 
. .
Whatever suits better... but the bitter truth is that no border is permanent... after 50 years there could be no Pakistan or India... who knows... Baluchistan, Greater Afghanistan, Khalistan, Marathas and what not...

On topic... Greater Nepal or Akhand Bharat... Military and economic might is needed... drawing Maps is not going to change the situation...
Oli is a communist... and under heavy influence of China... he is also rejecting the US aids and investments... lets see how long he can be a democratically elected PM... Bangladesh and Maldives are great examples of India and its capabilities... do not feel good for Chinese deeds...



There was no justifiable reason for Pakistan too before 1947... and whatever little reason was concatenated... ended in 1971... whatever little delusion which is remaining now... might end after creation of Baluchistan in near future... who knows...

MIGHT IS RIGHT...



bangladesh is some 2500 kms away from the Pakistani mainland. They are also genetically and racially different to Pakistani people. bangladesh is not even 1/6 the size of Pakistan. Barely 17% the size of Pakistan. On August the 14th 1947, "united india" lost over 35% of it's territory in the creation of Pakistan. The reason for a "united india" was destroyed forever. india no longer has a justifiable reason to exist. According to colonial or any other reasoning. Buy the way, the BLA are even more dead than the khalistan movement and unlike indians and bengalis, the Balouch are racially Pakistani.
 
.
On topic... Greater Nepal or Akhand Bharat... Military and economic might is needed... drawing Maps is not going to change the situation...
Oli is a communist... and under heavy influence of China... he is also rejecting the US aids and investments... lets see how long he can be a democratically elected PM... Bangladesh and Maldives are great examples of India and its capabilities... do not feel good for Chinese deeds...
Again going ahead to changing situation & skipping the part of who is right & who is wrong. Regarding the implementation of taking land on ground the Chinese have already taken it in Ladakh & as you say yourself China is behind Nepal just as you were in Dolkam it is a pure revenge I can also feel it. Your PM Modi is ultra silent.
The land is Nepalese an empire which existed before India & British took it that should be returned it is total injustice with Nepal & Gurkas.
 
.
There was no justifiable reason for Pakistan too before 1947... and whatever little reason was concatenated... ended in 1971... whatever little delusion which is remaining now... might end after creation of Baluchistan in near future... who knows...
Creation of Bangladesh didn't put a dent in Pakistan's argument for being Pakistan because firstly the land wasn't contiguous and secondly racially different. However it did put a dent in India's argument for existing as India because East Pakistan wasn't annexed by you guys. Had it been, you're argument might have had some validity. Yet here we are.
Plus Balochistan isn't disputed. No comparison here.
 
.
There was no Pakistan... Balochistan, Afghanistan and Sikh Empire's Punjab... These COLONIAL BRITISHERS took these lands during various MILITARY missions and handed over to the NAWABS FROM AWADH... to satisfy their EGO of being elite rulers...

Pakistan is only redrawing of the colonial borders of past & agenda. Today world has changed look at west they are throwing down statues of colonialism on which entire Pakistan agenda is based. The core of Pakistan argument is being destroyed & the reality is coming to life.

@GHALIB am I missing anything else...

There was NO india as well. Its just an artificial amalgamation of distinctly disimilar culturals and religions. There's not a single unifying force other than the fake secular mantra that congress tried to give it to keep the union intact. Now that good ol bjp is in da house the fake secular image has been shred to pieces, the results are that india is stressed both within and with its neighbours. And its only been just 5 6 years of bjp rule lol.

Pakistan atleast has always proclaimed since its inception that its an 'Islamic' republic and was actually built on the idea of having a separate land for the muslims of subcontinent and that is EXACTLY what it is.

As for the Afghans @GHALIB like someone already pointed out, there are most pashtuns in Karachi alone than in the whole of Afghanistan lol. So yeah me being a pashtun don't mind a 'Loy Pashtunistan' provided it remains a state of 'Greater Pakistan'
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom