What's new

China admits it: we are cutting off Filipino supply to Ayungin Shoal

We are NOT in the BARBARIC ERA anymore. We are now in the MODERN ERA. We have UNITED NATIONS NOW.

If CHINA attacks the Philippines, CHINA HAS TO EXPLAIN TO THE THE U.N. countries.

Knowing that CHINA'S CLAIM is not in accordance with the Law,

China will lose face

China will be shamed

China will suffer International Condemnation if she doesn't follow the ruling

China will be called a ROGUE NATION like North Korea

China will be called a NON LAW ABIDING COUNTRY

CHINA WILL BE PRESSURED so bad

China will be FORCED to withdraw her boats

The RULE OF THE LAW will prevail in the end.

I don't think you heard of security council in the UN. Anything binding in UN must be passed in security council. And any one of the 5 permanent members of the UN can veto any resolution. China is one of the 5. So no one is dumb enough to bring up anything against the big 5 in UNSC. You might be the first

First of all the incident happened clearly in the Philippine Waters. Any UNCLOS expert will support that. Secondly, the fisherman was DANGER TO OTHERS (Barbaric). They tried to RAM THE PCG boat. The CGs had to defend themselves by disbaling the engine. Any COUNTRY WOULD DO THE SAME.

Unfortunately, the fisherman was at the wrong side. According to the Indonesian witness, he LOOKED OUT and was shot.

The killing was UNINTENTIONAL

Barbaric ACT must be INTENTIONAL. In the case of the Fisherman, it was UNINTENTIONAL

China's act in the SOUTH CHINA SEA is INTENTIONAL. China INTENTIONALLY violates the rule of the law.

Now you know what is the REAL BARBARIC ACT


Tee hee!

So are you saying that the Filipino pirate unintentionally fired his gun. You should be smarter than that.
 
.
You pursued tw's boat starting within tw's economic zone and keep shooting at it even some of your soldier was reluctant to do so. tw's fishing boat did nothing but tried to get away. It has not rammed into your ship at all. Whatever said initially by ph government are just total lies and now it is quite clear after the full investigation.

The soldiers on the ph ship have all confessed what they have done criminally. Whatever you would like to say for your pathetic government??? "Unintentional"???

How about we sink one of your ships and starting telling you it was "unintentional"???




First of all the incident happened clearly in the Philippine Waters. Any UNCLOS expert will support that. Secondly, the fisherman was DANGER TO OTHERS (Barbaric). They tried to RAM THE PCG boat. The CGs had to defend themselves by disbaling the engine. Any COUNTRY WOULD DO THE SAME.

Unfortunately, the fisherman was at the wrong side. According to the Indonesian witness, he LOOKED OUT and was shot.

The killing was UNINTENTIONAL

Barbaric ACT must be INTENTIONAL. In the case of the Fisherman, it was UNINTENTIONAL

China's act in the SOUTH CHINA SEA is INTENTIONAL. China INTENTIONALLY violates the rule of the law.

Now you know what is the REAL BARBARIC ACT


Tee hee!

As your ph government recognizes already, tw is part of China. Why don't you go back consult with your government policy???


One an island vs the Archipelago doctrine its always the archipelago EZZ is always recognized first not unless a treaty is made by two countries other fact is Taiwan is no real country meanings taiwan's ezz is nonexistence all you chinese forumers are just talk go a head make out day! like its going to happen uncivilized morons :sniper::rofl:
 
.
You pursued tw's boat starting within tw's economic zone and keep shooting at it even some of your soldier was reluctant to do so. tw's fishing boat did nothing but tried to get away. It has not rammed into your ship at all. Whatever said initially by ph government are just total lies and now it is quite clear after the full investigation.

The soldiers on the ph ship have all confessed what they have done criminally. Whatever you would like to say for your pathetic government??? "Unintentional"???

How about we sink one of your ships and starting telling you it was "unintentional"???






As your ph government recognizes already, tw is part of China. Why don't you go back consult with your government policy???

Man your so stupid one It happen in our waters two you try to ram our ship so its not murder its self defense regardless of what size our vessel was or his a hostile act is a hostile act and if you prove it otherwise its not still murder its homicide but that's unlikely so you file the wrong case in court its automatically forfeit because its wrong idiot grow some brain cells
 
.
I do not know what kind of idiots you are???

Your ph navy guards have confessed already that tw's boat has never rammed into ph's ship.

tw boat's satellite sea route recorder has showed tw's boat was in tw's EEZ all the time.

No wonder ph are full of idiots and it is such a slave nation.

Man your so stupid one It happen in our waters two you try to ram our ship so its not murder its self defense regardless of what size our vessel was or his a hostile act is a hostile act and if you prove it otherwise its not still murder its homicide but that's unlikely so you file the wrong case in court its automatically forfeit because its wrong idiot grow some brain cells
 
.
It was theirs not yours oh please study unclos you morons find archipelagic doctrine
 
.
I don't think you heard of security council in the UN. Anything binding in UN must be passed in security council. And any one of the 5 permanent members of the UN can veto any resolution. China is one of the 5. So no one is dumb enough to bring up anything against the big 5 in UNSC. You might be the first.

If CHINA VETO'S it (which I doubt) CHINA will FACE MORE INTERNATIONAL CONDEMNATION for sure.

I don't think RISING CHINA would like that.

Also, do you think the US would listen to CHINA'S VETO?:coffee:
 
.
If CHINA VETO'S it (which I doubt) CHINA will FACE MORE INTERNATIONAL CONDEMNATION for sure.

I don't think RISING CHINA would like that.

Also, do you think the US would listen to CHINA'S VETO?:coffee:

you monkey brains: the strongest form of international condemnation is in UNSC actions. if we vetoed UNSC, you would think we give a damn about the rest? now what RISING CHINA would like and would not like is extremely important: we would like you pino macacas to suck it and we would not like to heed any international criticism of our whipping you pinos, and there isn't a thing international community or US is going to do about it.
 
.
You pursued tw's boat starting within tw's economic zone and keep shooting at it even some of your soldier was reluctant to do so. tw's fishing boat did nothing but tried to get away. It has not rammed into your ship at all. Whatever said initially by ph government are just total lies and now it is quite clear after the full investigation.

Any UCLOS EXPERT WOULD laugh at you right now. The Incident happened in the BALINTANG CHANNEL. Please look at the map first.

The soldiers on the ph ship have all confessed what they have done criminally. Whatever you would like to say for your pathetic government??? "Unintentional"???

When???? are you on drugs????:rofl:





As your ph government recognizes already, tw is part of China. Why don't you go back consult with your government policy???

Yes, the Philippines recognizes that tw is part of China "ON PAPER". But what do you REALLY SEE? NO right? hhahaha
 
.
you monkey brains: the strongest form of international condemnation is in UNSC actions. if we vetoed UNSC, you would think we give a damn about the rest? now what RISING CHINA would like and would not like is extremely important: we would like you pino macacas to suck it and we would not like to heed any international criticism of our whipping you pinos, and there isn't a thing international community or US is going to do about it.


What CHINA thinks her strength will become HER WEAKNESS. Go ahead VETO the RESOLUTION. CHINA will suffer the real CONDEMNATION, much worst than what you call the strongest form of international condemnation.

The US wants CHINA out of the SCS, China's VETO will be worthless in the END. tee hee

The UN Court's decision will give the US the legality to kick China out of the disputed waters

lmao zedong! :rofl:
 
.
A lot of Chinese warmongers here. Every thread I go to... Viets, Indians, Malaysians, Filipinos, all gang up against China.

I now see the reason why...
 
.
What CHINA thinks her strength will become HER WEAKNESS. Go ahead VETO the RESOLUTION. CHINA will suffer the real CONDEMNATION, much worst than what you call the strongest form of international condemnation.

The US wants CHINA out of the SCS, China's VETO will be worthless in the END. tee hee

The UN Court's decision will give the US the legality to kick China out of the disputed waters

lmao zedong! :rofl:

learn the hierarchy and structure of the UN - and the rules and principles of international politics in general - first before posting such childish, fantastic posts, you silly pino
 
.
What maps? The most correct records are the tw's boat's sea routing records, which are guided by GPS. That is the most accurate record to indicate where those boats are.

As for TW's right, it is not for you to give. Let's see who laugh at the end, you SOB.

Any UCLOS EXPERT WOULD laugh at you right now. The Incident happened in the BALINTANG CHANNEL. Please look at the map first.



When???? are you on drugs????:rofl:







Yes, the Philippines recognizes that tw is part of China "ON PAPER". But what do you REALLY SEE? NO right? hhahaha
 
.
learn the hierarchy and structure of the UN - and the rules and principles of international politics in general - first before posting such childish, fantastic posts, you silly pino

Then, the US, NATO and ASIA-PACIFIC NATO will enforce the UN COURT RULING. They will ignore CHINA'S VETO as the SCS is important to the Allies. Russia does not support CHINA in the SCS dispute (see Recent Sino Summits Fail on South China Sea » The Epoch Times )

When War breaks out in the SCS, CHINA WILL BE ALONE.
 
.
China invoked UNCLOS vs Japan but CHINA ignores the Philippines UNCLOS claim against China.

(Reuters) - The United Nations is planning to consider later this year the scientific validity of a claim by China that a group of disputed islands in the East China Sea are part of its territory, although Japan says the world body should not be involved.

Tensions over the uninhabited islands - located near rich fishing grounds and potentially huge oil-and-gas reserves - flared after Japan's government purchased them from a private Japanese owner in September, sparking violent anti-Japanese protests across China and a military standoff.

Taiwan also claims the islands, known as the Diaoyu islands in China, the Senkaku islands in Japan and Tiaoyutai in Taiwan.

In a submission to the U.N. Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, China claims that the continental shelf in the East China Sea is a natural prolongation of China's land territory and that it includes the disputed islands.

Under the U.N. convention, a country can extend its 200-nautical-mile economic zone if it can prove that the continental shelf is a natural extension of its land mass. The U.N. commission assesses the scientific validity of claims, but any disputes have to be resolved between states, not by the commission.

China said the "Diaoyu Dao upfold zone" - the islands - is located between the East China Sea shelf basin and the Okinawa Trough. "The Okinawa Trough is the natural termination of the continental shelf of (the East China Sea)," it said.

---

China invoked UNCLOS vs Japan but CHINA ignores the Philippines UNCLOS claim against China.

China invokes UNCLOS in claiming sovereignty over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands.

Are the CHINESE CRAZY?????? They say

1. Diaoyu/Senkaku - UNCLOS can be used
2. Scarborough/Spraltys - UNCLOS is ILLEGGAL

The Chinese government is contradicting itself.

China’s move to use Unclos in its dispute with Japan should bolster the Philippines’ position to settle its own territorial conflict with China with the international body.

CHINA MUST BE CRAZY!
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom