What's new

China accuses US Navy of ‘cognitive warfare’ after ‘unusual’ photo emerges

Also if you seen the picture it's within harpoon range. Means if the destroyer captain wanted it would have SINK A CARRIER like it was nothing. If it was real that mean china would lost a carrier.

This is pretty much telling how easy it would be to wipe out the chinese fleet if conflict start.


Do you think with harpoon Mustin will have guarantee to be able to destroy Liaoning?

Even if it is as close as you think, it wont be easy to shoot Liaoning with Harpoon.

Look at this phalanx and anti missile system :)

 
.
Do you think with harpoon Mustin will have guarantee to be able to destroy Liaoning?

Even if it is as close as you think, it wont be easy to shoot Liaoning with Harpoon.

Look at this phalanx and anti missile system :)


Harpoon main sells is that it can fly below radar coverage, reappear and strike before the ship's AAD can responds. At that range it pretty much a guaranteed kill. Also china doesn't have Phalanx.

US spy planes keep close eye on China amid live-fire military exercises

  • American aircraft goes unusually near naval base on east coast, think tank says
  • Patrols also carried out over disputed South China Sea, with aircraft going dark around Paracels, it says

Liu Zhen



Liu Zhen in Beijing
+ FOLLOW

Published: 9:31pm, 21 Apr, 2021

Updated: 9:40pm, 21 Apr, 2021


Why you can trust SCMP

knowledge

Asia’s territorial disputes





The US military has sent a number of spy planes to patrol near China in recent days, according to a think tank. Photo: US Air Force

The US military has sent a number of spy planes to patrol near China in recent days, according to a think tank. Photo: US Air Force

A US spy plane buzzed the Chinese coast this week, one of several warplanes deployed close to Chinese territorial waters amid live-fire exercises by the PLA Navy, according to a think tank.
The Beijing-based South China Sea Strategic Situation Probing Initiative said a US Air Force RC-135W electronic reconnaissance aircraft made an unusually close flight along China’s eastern coast on Tuesday, coming within 40 nautical miles of Qingdao, the headquarters of People’s Liberation Army Navy’s North Sea Fleet.

An RC-135W and a P-8A anti-submarine aircraft also patrolled
the South China Sea
on Wednesday during live-fire exercises in the disputed waters, according to the think tank.
Last week, US spy planes patrolled along the southeast coast of Guangdong province before heading south to the disputed Paracel Islands, also in the South China Sea, according to open-source aviation radar responder records.

The think tank said the aircraft involved in the patrols last week and on Wednesday temporarily “disappeared” from public radar records when flying over the eastern to northern section of the Paracels, possibly “having turned off their responders”.


State broadcaster China Central Television said near-shore patrols enabled planes to detect electronic signals on land in their mission to collect intelligence on the PLA.

“The patrols enable them to obtain more information in the shortest time and more valuable signals in the most efficient manner,” the broadcaster said.
NEW
https://www.scmp.com/knowledge/topi...es?module=inline_widget_banner&pgtype=article
At the same time, PLA’s Liaoning aircraft carrier strike group has been conducting exercises near Taiwan.

Last September, China accused US warplanes of masquerading as civilian aircraft in close-shore reconnaissance missions, posing a “serious security threat”. Foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said identity disguise was a “common trick”, with the US Air Force carrying out such exercises at least 100 times in 2020.

In August, a US surveillance plane flew into the no-fly zone China announced for a military exercise in the Yellow Sea, prompting a protest from the Chinese defense ministry.


Another embarrassment for the PLAN
 

Attachments

  • 1619202213615.png
    1619202213615.png
    73 bytes · Views: 29
.
Harpoon main sells is that it can fly below radar coverage, reappear and strike before the ship's AAD can responds. At that range it pretty much a guaranteed kill. Also china doesn't have Phalanx.



First: element or surprise from the sea skimming missile like harpoon/exoceet will be relevant when launched beyond the horizon of the target.
During falkland war, Argentina launch exoceet from fighter flying at low altitude, it only ascended when it about to launch the missile and it launch the missile where it was still beyond horizon, hence brought element of surprise for the HMS shefield.
If Mustin distance is too close and observable from Liaoning, that means there will be no element of surprise anymore. All radar and sensor system from Liaoning/renhai will keep paying attention on the Mustin and any possible missile launch from it, and possibility for harpoon to be successful in hitting Liaoning is small.

Second, Liaoning and Renhai is equipped with AESA radar that have high agility in scanning at both high and low altitude object at once, hence will give more time for anti missile to track and destroy sea skimming missile like harpoon and exoceet. Different with mechanical radar that can't scan high and low altitude at once.

Harpoon speed is still subsonic, hence the possibility for CIWS and anti missile to hit it is still high.

In the meantime YJ-12 from Renhai or Type 052 is sea skimming like harpoon, the difference is YJ-12 is supersonic. That means Renhai will be more lethal tnan Mustin.

1619206362999.png




This is YJ-18, not sea skimming but supersonic at low altitude and with zigzag maneuver at terminal stage.
 

Attachments

  • 1619206021673.png
    1619206021673.png
    13.7 KB · Views: 32
Last edited:
. .
lol poor indoctrinated Americans and endless Western victims of American state propaganda

American state propaganda agent posing as foreign journalist writes mail to random retired Chinese teacher with loaded question to trigger comment on the U.S. regimes latest chest thumbing,

American state propaganda agent takes answer for loaded question out of contex

American state propaganda agent publishes it in a fake foreign newspaper

American state propaganda agent informs non-covert American state propaganda mouthpieces that the content has been planted in a cover story

American state propaganda mouthpieces cite the fake foreign newspapers mined quote out of context again

Prefix random 10 word opinion by one person with no representative role or status, referring to the words used by the American state propaganda agent in first place asking him to comment, with a "China said"

Put the "China said thing" lie in the headline.

Low IQ tards consuming American state propaganda: Wow China did what?!?
 
.
First: element or surprise from the sea skimming missile like harpoon/exoceet will be relevant when launched beyond the horizon of the target.
During falkland war, Argentina launch exoceet from fighter flying at low altitude, it only ascended when it about to launch the missile and it launch the missile where it was still beyond horizon, hence brought element of surprise for the HMS shefield.
If Mustin distance is too close and observable from Liaoning, that means there will be no element of surprise anymore. All radar and sensor system from Liaoning/renhai will keep paying attention on the Mustin and any possible missile launch from it, and possibility for harpoon to be successful in hitting Liaoning is small.

Second, Liaoning and Renhai is equipped with AESA radar that have high agility in scanning at both high and low altitude object at once, hence will give more time for anti missile to track and destroy sea skimming missile like harpoon and exoceet. Different with mechanical radar that can't scan high and low altitude at once.

Harpoon speed is still subsonic, hence the possibility for CIWS and anti missile to hit it is still high.

In the meantime YJ-12 from Renhai or Type 052 is sea skimming like harpoon, the difference is YJ-12 is supersonic. That means Renhai will be more lethal tnan Mustin.

View attachment 736827



This is YJ-18, not sea skimming but supersonic at low altitude and with zigzag maneuver at terminal stage.

Harpoon have higher stealth capability compared to most missile hence why its still hard to intercept alone. At that range it can still evade detection and the Ship EW can fry Lianoning's onboard electronic as shown at how the Turk's Koral can blind a french frigate over the coast of Libya. Not all AESA radar are equal. Until Chinese radar are up to par to western or even the American Spy-6 is just wishful thinking at best. Also the new Spy-7 just came out. Also most importantly the liaoning was ALONE during the picture. AAD are only effective if it overlap with other systems making what you claimed null & void.

Addendum: Brainfart on my part the mustin also have torpedoes. So yeah it still gonna get sunk regardless.

Supersonic missile are above horizon and can be intercepted more easily while harpoon are below following earth curvature making it near impossible to detect until it's too late. That's the difference between the 2 systems.

Also doesn't matter how many ships China's build if the US can just spam this:
& LRASM are told have less signatures than a harpoon.

Do China even have a countermeasure for this?
 
Last edited:
.
Harpoon have higher stealth capability compared to most missile hence why its still hard to intercept alone.

Nope. Harpoon is just like exocet, not a stealth missile.
Harpoon can be detected by radar, any radar can detect sea skimming missile within 30km because the radar EM wave still can reach the low flying missile and be reflected back to radar receiver. Read the citation I have given you above.
Find fact first before make a bold claim :laughcry:

At that range it can still evade detection

It can evade radar if the distance between harpoon and radar is still beyond 30km, because it is over horizon. When it is within 30km radar can detect.

and the Ship EW can fry Lianoning's onboard electronic as shown at how the Turk's Koral can blind a french frigate over the coast of Libya. Not all AESA radar are equal. Until Chinese radar are up to par to western or even the American Spy-6 is just wishful thinking at best. Also the new Spy-7 just came out. Also most importantly the liaoning was ALONE during the picture. AAD are only effective if it overlap with other systems making what you claimed null & void.

Sorry to ruin your dream .... only the latest version Arleigh burke flight III equipped with AESA radar; most US destroyer including Mustin is not AESA yet ;)

Yes not all AESA radar are equal, and we dont know yet who between US and China has the best AESA. This could mean US AESA is better than Chinese, or the other way round Chinese latest AESA is better than US latest one; US AESA used to be better, but China is doing R&D for AESA very intense, like the way they develop 5G. China surpassing US in AESA could happen the same way China surpassing US in 5G, supercomputer, AI, and Quantum tech ;)


Addendum: Brainfart on my part the mustin also have torpedoes. So yeah it still gonna get sunk regardless.

Yeah ... so is with Type 055, Type 052, Type 054, J-15 from Liaoning, they all bring and can launch torpedo. Especially torpedo from low flying J-15/ASW helicopter can bring element of surprise for Mustin ;)

Which is more lethal? 1 source Mustin which is already monitored vs many sources (055, 052D, 054 including from J-15 which Mustin crew could not guess when the J-15 fire torpedo? :lol: )

Torpedo is lethal if it has element of surprise, but again once Mustin position is known and monitored, there will be no more element of surprise.

Supersonic missile are above horizon and can be intercepted more easily while harpoon are below following earth curvature making it near impossible to detect until it's too late. That's the difference between the 2 systems.

WRONG, use your logic! the fastest the target the more difficult to be intercepted, not the otherway round :laughcry:

Supersonic sea skimming is extremely difficult to be intercepted, while subsonic harpoon is easier.
And harpoon from observable Mustin is not from beyond horizon! Beyond horizon means you can't detect the missile by eyes/optical nor by radar EM because the round shape of earth. If Mustin crew can see Liaoning or vice versa, it means both are not beyond horizon of each other sight.

Also doesn't matter how many ships China's build if the US can just spam this:
& LRASM are told have less signatures than a harpoon.

Do China even have a countermeasure for this?

LOL. Since when Mustin have and can launch LRASM? You are too much.

China have KD-10 LRASM.
 
Last edited:
.
First: element or surprise from the sea skimming missile like harpoon/exoceet will be relevant when launched beyond the horizon of the target.
During falkland war, Argentina launch exoceet from fighter flying at low altitude, it only ascended when it about to launch the missile and it launch the missile where it was still beyond horizon, hence brought element of surprise for the HMS shefield.
If Mustin distance is too close and observable from Liaoning, that means there will be no element of surprise anymore. All radar and sensor system from Liaoning/renhai will keep paying attention on the Mustin and any possible missile launch from it, and possibility for harpoon to be successful in hitting Liaoning is small.

Second, Liaoning and Renhai is equipped with AESA radar that have high agility in scanning at both high and low altitude object at once, hence will give more time for anti missile to track and destroy sea skimming missile like harpoon and exoceet. Different with mechanical radar that can't scan high and low altitude at once.

Harpoon speed is still subsonic, hence the possibility for CIWS and anti missile to hit it is still high.

In the meantime YJ-12 from Renhai or Type 052 is sea skimming like harpoon, the difference is YJ-12 is supersonic. That means Renhai will be more lethal tnan Mustin.

View attachment 736827



This is YJ-18, not sea skimming but supersonic at low altitude and with zigzag maneuver at terminal stage.

wikipedia is not credible source

and that is a Chinese video showing a launch then a hit of two different missiles

this is called selective editing and clearly fake
 
.
wikipedia is not credible source

and that is a Chinese video showing a launch then a hit of two different missiles

this is called selective editing and clearly fake


So you mean video/information showing/about US weapon is correct and accurate while information/video about Chinese weapon is always questionnable and edited? LOL. Who is being selective here? :rofl:

If wikipedia is not credible, why dont you bring the credible one.
 
Last edited:
.
I am truly impressed.

If China can pointed that out, it is an indication that they have arrived.

Watch out USA.

Your Strategic communication laboratory needs a new supercomputer.


It is already failing before it can even begin.

:coffee: :cheers:
 
.
No wonder Pentagon is living with fear today.

They are now worried that China Military may used its robotic arm satelites to disable USA communication and spy satellites up in space.

Then these US sailors might as well enjoy their sun tan before they go deep diving to no return.

In the meantime Indians trolling in here have shown no concern about the 332,000 new cases of COVID registered yesterday alone. And the deadly triple mutant variants.

We are.

They are more concern about China.
 
.
PLAN could have done the same to US aircraft carrier but Chinese are not acting like kid which the US do.

The american military always try to sell a macho image for local consumption but we all know the limit of American military. A small little Iran attack US base in iraq with ballistic missiles and all US military might can response is to ask for peace!

What is even there to talk about for US when facing a much bigger China? :enjoy:

Precisely, if I used the author stupid explanation. USN must be spineless and incompetent too?


There is a limit of interception in an international sea. You cannot stop anybody on international sea. China only claim the islet inside nine dash line and not the whole sea. Of cos fake US media will spin another story. :enjoy:

what iran can do china can not .
 
.
Nope. Harpoon is just like exocet, not a stealth missile.
Harpoon can be detected by radar, any radar can detect sea skimming missile within 30km because the radar EM wave still can reach the low flying missile and be reflected back to radar receiver. Read the citation I have given you above.
Find fact first before make a bold claim :laughcry:



It can evade radar if the distance between harpoon and radar is still beyond 30km, because it is over horizon. When it is within 30km radar can detect.



Sorry to ruin your dream .... only the latest version Arleigh burke flight III equipped with AESA radar; most US destroyer including Mustin is not AESA yet ;)

Yes not all AESA radar are equal, and we dont know yet who between US and China has the best AESA. This could mean US AESA is better than Chinese, or the other way round Chinese latest AESA is better than US latest one; US AESA used to be better, but China is doing R&D for AESA very intense, like the way they develop 5G. China surpassing US in AESA could happen the same way China surpassing US in 5G, supercomputer, AI, and Quantum tech ;)




Yeah ... so is with Type 055, Type 052, Type 054, J-15 from Liaoning, they all bring and can launch torpedo. Especially torpedo from low flying J-15/ASW helicopter can bring element of surprise for Mustin ;)

Which is more lethal? 1 source Mustin which is already monitored vs many sources (055, 052D, 054 including from J-15 which Mustin crew could not guess when the J-15 fire torpedo? :lol: )

Torpedo is lethal if it has element of surprise, but again once Mustin position is known and monitored, there will be no more element of surprise.



WRONG, use your logic! the fastest the target the more difficult to be intercepted, not the otherway round :laughcry:

Supersonic sea skimming is extremely difficult to be intercepted, while subsonic harpoon is easier.
And harpoon from observable Mustin is not from beyond horizon! Beyond horizon means you can't detect the missile by eyes/optical nor by radar EM because the round shape of earth. If Mustin crew can see Liaoning or vice versa, it means both are not beyond horizon of each other sight.



LOL. Since when Mustin have and can launch LRASM? You are too much.

China have KD-10 LRASM.

The Liaoning still would have sunk, if the Mustin CO wanted to see a carrier blown up & by the way the CO acted also doesn't considers the Chinese STG as a threat. My point still stands. A DDG at that range doesn't even need to use Harpoon to sink a lone carrier. Torps and even deck gun would have sufficed.
 
.
The Liaoning still would have sunk, if the Mustin CO wanted to see a carrier blown up & by the way the CO acted also doesn't considers the Chinese STG as a threat. My point still stands. A DDG at that range doesn't even need to use Harpoon to sink a lone carrier. Torps and even deck gun would have sufficed.


Torpedo from Mustin will be easy to detect and predict, hence easy for Liaoning to evade or do countermeassure, so not much threatening :)

In the meantime, torpedo and missile from J-15 will be difficult to be detected for Mustin, becauseJ-15 could keep change the position fast easily and could launch torpedo or missile from beyond horizon of the Mustin view, hence Mustin radar can't predict; not to mention from any other Liaoning's escorting ships and submarine; so Liaoning CBG is much more a threat for Mustin than the other way round.

Deck gun is useless, can't sink a ship leave alone carrier. Once Mustin fire deck gun, a supersonic sea skim YJ-12 could be launched by any of Liaoning escorting ship as retaliation, we can say Mustin will certainly sink, not only because the lethality supersonic sea skimmer, but CBG could launch numerous YJ-12, YJ-18, and torpedo simultanuously to Mustin if they want to ensure the destcruction. :)
 
Last edited:
.
Torpedo from Mustin will be easy to detect and predict, hence easy for Liaoning to evade or do countermeassure, so not much threatening :)

In the meantime, torpedo and missile from J-15 will be difficult to be detected for Mustin, becauseJ-15 could keep change the position fast easily; not to mention from any other Liaoning's escorting ships and submarine; so Liaoning CBG is much more a threat for Mustin than the other way round.

Deck gun is useless, can't sink a ship leave alone carrier. Once Mustin fire deck gun, a supersonic sea skim YJ-12 could be launched by any of Liaoning escorting ship as retaliation, we can say Mustin will certainly sink, not only because the lethality supersonic sea skimmer, but CBG could launch numerous YJ-12, YJ-18, and torpedo simultanuously to Mustin if they want to ensure the destcruction. :)

BIG SLOW CHONKY SHIP, FAST TORPS. Do the math...

Also ever heard of targeted strike? The deck gun doesn't need to destroy a ship to sink just target the vulnerable spots to disable the ship. Then kill 'em with Harpoon or torps.

There was no escort at that moment if the Mustin decided to go full salvo then, the Liaoning would have been at the bottom of the ocean. That shows the level of competence PLAN sailors have if they let their Capital ship unguarded.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom