Cellphones and Cancer

[Death Professor]

 

[denel]

Another trolling/misnomer from RT. Please close this thread.

You have a higher chance to get cancer with higher fat diet that RF radiation. RF radiation at higher power can cook you. Want to give it a try, put your head into the microwave. You have more rf coming out of microwave oven in front despite the shielding that what you are getting out of a cellphone; around 40x more.

I worked in a very heavy RF environment ; no cases what so ever for decades except a drunkard who went into a microwave..

 

[Death Professor]

I worked in a very heavy RF environment ; no cases what so ever for decades except a drunkard who went into a microwave..

A friend of mine is a chain smoker he too thinks that smoking cigarettes doesn't cause cancer. I guess by your logic, I should take his word for it since he is very much experienced in smoking.

Another trolling/misnomer from RT. Please close this thread.

You have a better source? quote it then. It is you who is spreading misinformation without any source. You have experience with RFR, publish your thesis/report/publication, if you can't then sssssshhhhhh......

https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) nominated radio frequency radiation (RFR) used by cell phones for an NTP study because of widespread public use of cell phones and limited knowledge about potential health effects from long-term exposure.

The NTP studies found that high exposure to RFR used by cell phones was associated with:

• Clear evidence of tumors in the hearts of male rats. The tumors were malignant schwannomas.
• Some evidence of tumors in the brains of male rats. The tumors were malignant gliomas.
• Some evidence of tumors in the adrenal glands of male rats. The tumors were benign, malignant, or complex combined pheochromocytoma.

 

[War Thunder]

Another trolling/misnomer from RT. Please close this thread.

You have a higher chance to get cancer with higher fat diet that RF radiation. RF radiation at higher power can cook you. Want to give it a try, put your head into the microwave. You have more rf coming out of microwave oven in front despite the shielding that what you are getting out of a cellphone; around 40x more.

I worked in a very heavy RF environment ; no cases what so ever for decades except a drunkard who went into a microwave..

Misinformation/Trolling? Just bcz it walks above your intellect?
All types of radiations are harmful and that includes the ones that come out of your cell phone (period).

 

[denel]

Misinformation/Trolling? Just bcz it walks above your intellect?
All types of radiations are harmful and that includes the ones that come out of your cell phone (period).

Not going to argue with you. Use common sense and medical facts.

Yes RF is dangerous but it does not cause cancer. That is what I am stating and RT is a master BS stirrer with alternate theories which have no grounds in any scientific basis.

Look at the source pal and use common sense. RF is seriously dangerous and it burns and you can get 3rd degree; it cooks from inside out; but cancer is not it. that is why i gave you example of microwaves. It is this cause which is noted to keep the antenna away from your head on cellphones. If you want to experience RF burn, get a CB radio (27Mhz, 4w); just power it up and press PTT; and hold the antenna in your hand you will get RF burn mark on your hand.

Given the useage level --- all of the world would be challenged with brain cancer at a pandemic level right now.

This is my rf footprint. Including 1kw VHF/UHF amplifiers for EME operation. 20m yagi @ 30m, square array for 75/40m operation. I would be the first candidate based RT's logic.

A friend of mine is a chain smoker he too thinks that smoking cigarettes doesn't cause cancer. I guess by your logic, I should take his word for it since he is very much experienced in smoking.



You have a better source? quote it then. It is you who is spreading misinformation without any source. You have experience with RFR, publish your thesis/report/publication, if you can't then sssssshhhhhh......

https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) nominated radio frequency radiation (RFR) used by cell phones for an NTP study because of widespread public use of cell phones and limited knowledge about potential health effects from long-term exposure.

The NTP studies found that high exposure to RFR used by cell phones was associated with:

• Clear evidence of tumors in the hearts of male rats. The tumors were malignant schwannomas.
• Some evidence of tumors in the brains of male rats. The tumors were malignant gliomas.
• Some evidence of tumors in the adrenal glands of male rats. The tumors were benign, malignant, or complex combined pheochromocytoma.

Not disagreeing with some studies; that was 20yrs back; provide some new study.

Smoking.. does cause cancer. that is a fact.

 

[Death Professor]

Not disagreeing with some studies; that was 20yrs back; provide some new study.

Smoking.. does cause cancer. that is a fact.

This is the latest study published and reviewed by external scientific sources in MARCH 2018. And this is a medical study and this is also a fact. and who is even talking about RT? I am directly giving you the source, National Toxicology Program. And its not like they did the research on their own, this whole thing was nominated by FDA in 1999 but this whole study has been confirmed and reviewed in 2018, just because nomination of study was in 1999 doesn't make the study by itself to be 20 years old.

Feel like you didn't even bother to go through the source, hence posting it again, that may be you will read the whole thing again.
https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/

Review in March 2018:
https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/events/pa...w+Panels+-+Technical+Reports&&date=2018-03-26

Hope you atleast read the bold parts, This was their news release on November 1st 2018, NOT 20 years ago
https://www.niehs.nih.gov/news/newsroom/releases/2018/november1/index.cfm
The $30 million NTP studies took more than 10 years to complete and are the most comprehensive assessment, to date, of health effects in animals exposed to RFR with modulations used in 2G and 3G cell phones. 2G and 3G networks were standard when the studies were designed and are still used for phone calls and texting.

NTP uses four categories to summarize the evidence that a substance may cause cancer:

• Clear evidence (highest)
• Some evidence
• Equivocal evidence
• No evidence (lowest)

And the evidence they got is the clear evidence. Ahhh, the irony, just wish when you talk about facts, common sense and medical science, at-least bother to read from the source.


And it's not like their is hidden Illuminati agenda of the supremely powerful NTP against the poor cellular companies. Because they are so weak and helpless (obviously I am being sarcastic here). For you today, smoking gives cancer is a fact, but 95 years ago, they too thought smoking and lung cancer had no correlation, it was only after the studies in 1930's they found correlation with lung cancer when Britain had the highest lung cancer rate.

 

[denel]

This is the latest study published and reviewed by external scientific sources in MARCH 2018. And this is a medical study and this is also a fact. and who is even talking about RT? I am directly giving you the source, National Toxicology Program. And its not like they did the research on their own, this whole thing was nominated by FDA in 1999 but this whole study has been confirmed and reviewed in 2018, just because nomination of study was in 1999 doesn't make the study by itself to be 20 years old.

Feel like you didn't even bother to go through the source, hence posting it again, that may be you will read the whole thing again.
https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/

Review in March 2018:
https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/events/pa...w+Panels+-+Technical+Reports&&date=2018-03-26

Hope you atleast read the bold parts, This was their news release on November 1st 2018, NOT 20 years ago
https://www.niehs.nih.gov/news/newsroom/releases/2018/november1/index.cfm
The $30 million NTP studies took more than 10 years to complete and are the most comprehensive assessment, to date, of health effects in animals exposed to RFR with modulations used in 2G and 3G cell phones. 2G and 3G networks were standard when the studies were designed and are still used for phone calls and texting.

NTP uses four categories to summarize the evidence that a substance may cause cancer:

• Clear evidence (highest)
• Some evidence
• Equivocal evidence
• No evidence (lowest)

And the evidence they got is the clear evidence. Ahhh, the irony, just wish when you talk about facts, common sense and medical science, at-least bother to read from the source.


And it's not like their is hidden Illuminati agenda of the supremely powerful NTP against the poor cellular companies. Because they are so weak and helpless (obviously I am being sarcastic here). For you today, smoking gives cancer is a fact, but 95 years ago, they too thought smoking and lung cancer had no correlation, it was only after the studies in 1930's they found correlation with lung cancer when Britain had the highest lung cancer rate.

It is possible boet. Lets see time will tell. If that was the case all chinese will be dead of this by now.