What's new

Can China catch up with India in space race?

Indians are the most delusional, day dreaming, fantasy indulging cow piss believing people I ever see

even so called Indian china expert, scientists are so delusional claiming India is ahead of China in the space :rofl: :rofl:

no wonder constant cow piss drinking help prevent covid thing :rofl: :rofl:

seriously we can never catch up, but catch down India :rofl: :rofl:






 
.
I talked of Long March 3, not 3B. 3B is just a predecessor of Long March 5. 3B was much later upgraded from long march 3. I was responding to someone comparing GSLV 3 to LM3. You introduced 3B baselessly just to boost your ego. LM3 is equivalent to PSLV

I don't see how size is a determinant of technology? I have already stated that Saturn 5 that was used in Apollo mission was ultra large. But that does not mean they were of better technology than Long march 5. Similarly, larger rockets are not signs of better technology in any way. India does not need a rocket that carries more than 6tons and this has been said openly by ISRO chairman. So, India won't design bigger rockets that consume hundreds of thousands of tons of extra fuel

Good luck with such theories. Tomorrow you may even claim that PSLV is a licensed copy of firecracker rockets.

We all saw how Chinese landing on moon failed so spectacularly. So, think before commenting on Vikram lander. India does these things only for PR stunt and has no real strategic objectives. Why should India spend unnecessary money on these when they serve no purpose? That is why India does these things in a cheap manner. No one is stopping others from doing the same.

do your research before bullshit, OK? Long march 3B is based on Long march 3, compared to Long march 5 they are totally different beasts with engine, fuel, diameter size

simply put, you don't have capability to build any heavy rockets, ok? you pay French to do the job for you. I am sure if you can, you Indian trolls will brag to death

what do you mean China moon landing failed so spectacularly? It's 100% success rate, first one in 2013, second one on the far side of moon which nobody has done before, the third one returned 2kg moon rock sample, you Indian guys so self-delusional and ignorant
 
Last edited:
. .
How many attempts did it take for China? India did only 1 attempt and failed in it. If India makes multiple attempts, it will also land. As i said, India sees to unimportant things like moon landing in a shoestring budget solely for PR and hence has not launched multiple landers. So, compare accordingly.

again you can all bullshit to your domestic Hinduvta fools, but nonsense will not work at international level, just see how modi failed miserably

do you basic research then tell me how many moon landing attempts China did?


3 moon landing attempts, 3 success
1 mars landing attempt, 1 success
 
.
How many attempts did it take for China? India did only 1 attempt and failed in it. If India makes multiple attempts, it will also land. As i said, India sees to unimportant things like moon landing in a shoestring budget solely for PR and hence has not launched multiple landers. So, compare accordingly.

send 13 kg payload to orbit mars is not PR but serious science research? :rofl: :rofl:
 
. .
.

China's first Mars rover drives onto red planet's surface
Source: Xinhua| 2021-05-22 14:10:43|Editor: huaxia

BEIJING, May 22 (Xinhua) -- China's first Mars rover, Zhurong, has driven down from its landing platform to the Martian surface, the China National Space Administration (CNSA) announced on Saturday.
Zhurong's first successful drive made China the second country after the United States to land and operate a rover on Mars.
According to the telemetry data, Zhurong set its wheels on Martian soil at 10:40 a.m. (Beijing Time) on Saturday, the CNSA said.
China's Tianwen-1 mission, consisting of an orbiter, a lander and a rover, was launched on July 23, 2020. The lander carrying the rover touched down in the southern part of Utopia Planitia, a vast plain on the northern hemisphere of Mars, on May 15.
The six-wheeled solar-powered rover, resembling a blue butterfly and with a mass of 240 kg, is named after the god of fire in ancient Chinese mythology. The name echoes with the Chinese name for the red planet, Huoxing (the planet of fire), while the name of the mission, Tianwen, means Questions to Heaven, the title of a poem by the ancient Chinese poet Qu Yuan (circa 340-278 BC).
With an expected lifespan of at least 90 Martian days (about three months on Earth), Zhurong will record the Martian landscape with high-resolution three-dimensional images, analyze the material composition of the planet's surface, detect its sub-surface structure and magnetic field, search for traces of water ice and observe the surrounding meteorological environment.
It carries various scientific instruments, including terrain camera, multi-spectral camera, sub-surface exploration radar, surface-composition detector, magnetic-field detector and meteorology monitor.
The orbiter, with a design life of one Martian year (about 687 days on Earth), will relay communications for the rover while conducting its own scientific detection operations. Enditem

@Syama Ayas @Smarana Mitra :enjoy: Enjoy the moment. No need to add salt for your meal!
 
.
.
I talked of Long March 3, not 3B. 3B is just a predecessor of Long March 5. 3B was much later upgraded from long march 3. I was responding to someone comparing GSLV 3 to LM3. You introduced 3B baselessly just to boost your ego. LM3 is equivalent to PSLV

I don't see how size is a determinant of technology? I have already stated that Saturn 5 that was used in Apollo mission was ultra large. But that does not mean they were of better technology than Long march 5. Similarly, larger rockets are not signs of better technology in any way. India does not need a rocket that carries more than 6tons and this has been said openly by ISRO chairman. So, India won't design bigger rockets that consume hundreds of thousands of tons of extra fuel

Good luck with such theories. Tomorrow you may even claim that PSLV is a licensed copy of firecracker rockets.

We all saw how Chinese landing on moon failed so spectacularly. So, think before commenting on Vikram lander. India does these things only for PR stunt and has no real strategic objectives. Why should India spend unnecessary money on these when they serve no purpose? That is why India does these things in a cheap manner. No one is stopping others from doing the same.
perhaps u r relatively new to cnsa space programs...
cnsa has made 3 lunar landings & all of them are successful.
if you dont agree pls provide a source to prove your allegation.
 
.
perhaps u r relatively new to cnsa space programs...
cnsa has made 3 lunar landings & all of them are successful.
if you dont agree pls provide a source to prove your allegation.
He is sourgraped loser. Ignorant and full of crapped. CNSA is thousand miles ahead of ISRO and is a bitter pill difficult for him to swallow. He will used fake hindu source to delude himself about China lunar failed landing. :lol:
 
.
He is sourgraped loser. Ignorant and full of crapped. CNSA is thousand miles ahead of ISRO and is a bitter pill difficult for him to swallow. He will used fake hindu source to delude himself about China lunar failed landing. :lol:
i hope he will answer my post with a source to support his allegation.
i m really really surprise & shock he claims cnsa lunar landing failed...i simply dont comprehend that.
 
. .
Just because China is located north of India does not mean anything. Your "thousands of miles" is a stupid remark. CNSA is 7-8 years ahead of India, which is very little in grand scale of things.

@waz @LeGenD @krash

Looks like some lose the plot and decide to go personal with insulting remark instead of a civilised debate.

Minor advance?

China master space station complete technique from manned mission, unmanned docking. Spacewalk. To deep space exploration and lunar and mars landing. Not to mention China currently space payload is second to US only. You are kidding me so many tasks can be closed by ISRO in 7-8 years? :rofl:
 
Last edited:
.
@waz @LeGenD @krash

Looks like some lose the plot and decide to go personal with insulting remark instead of a civilised debate.

Minor advance?

China master space station complete technique from manned mission, unmanned docking. Spacewalk. To deep space exploration and lunar and mars landing. Not to mention China currently space payload is second to US only. You are kidding me so many tasks can be closed by ISRO in 7-8 years? :rofl:

So many frustrated Indians that can’t accept that China is ahead of India in space achievements.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom