roadrunner
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2007
- Messages
- 5,696
- Reaction score
- 0
But on the frontpage of the Boston news, I saw this picture, and I couldn't help notice they looked very very poor. Yet they were crying for someone who looted them personally. Not only that, the whole act of crying so emotionally for someone they never met, like it was a relative, seems amazingly staged. Here is the picture from Boston News captioned "Supporters of Pakistan's slain opposition leader Benazir Bhutto mourn at her residence in Karachi, Pakistan on Saturday, Jan. 5, 2008". What do you think? Are the poor people being paid to act for the cameras by PPP?
It's a conspiracy. But why would anyone cry so much as in that photo for someone that had looted the country and their own wealth? And why are they always poor people doing the crying? Are they more emotionally disturbed than richer people? It's just some thoughts I had, feel free to delete the thread if you like, just wondering what others thought, whether such pictures are stage managed.
It's a conspiracy. But why would anyone cry so much as in that photo for someone that had looted the country and their own wealth? And why are they always poor people doing the crying? Are they more emotionally disturbed than richer people? It's just some thoughts I had, feel free to delete the thread if you like, just wondering what others thought, whether such pictures are stage managed.