Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Embarrassing that India is no where in the list.
But we have several projects in the pipeline.
Is india very flat or are there alot of mountains? 70% of china's landmass are mountains, hills, highlands so a lot of the population is concentrated in that 30% area left which means buildings go up high due to land being at a premium.
India is very blessed, most of the land below Kashmir is very flat.
However India is prone to natural disasters, which can act as an deterrent to making tall buildings (and funds.)
Indonesia or Japan
Why are the likes of France and UK are so low?As per CTBUH, latest ranking of countries by skyscrapers (200m+ completed buildings) is as below. Over 43% of all are in China, followed by US, UAE, South Korea, Japan, Australia, Indonesia and Singapore.
Why are the likes of France and UK are so low?
There are highs and lows so I can't comment on that, though I agree with @madokafc that natural environment is not an hinderance given Japan and Indonesia have high number of skyscrapers.
My comment on several Chinese metropolis (say Hong Kong, Shanghai) is that urban planners are "metro-centric", "hi-lo mix", i.e. construct a huge web of metro (urban rail transport), allocate ultra hi-density (hence more skyscrapers) to vicinity of metro access, and leaves other urban land very low-density. Metro and skyscraper must co-exist.
maybe i can.......There are highs and lows so I can't comment on that, .
There are highs and lows so I can't comment on that, though I agree with @madokafc that natural environment is not an hinderance given Japan and Indonesia have high number of skyscrapers.
My comment on several Chinese metropolis (say Hong Kong, Shanghai) is that urban planners are "metro-centric", "hi-lo mix", i.e. construct a huge web of metro (urban rail transport), allocate ultra hi-density (hence more skyscrapers) to vicinity of metro access, and leaves other urban land very low-density. Metro and skyscraper must co-exist.
Good info!maybe i can.......
you see london is in need of towers and several projects have been approved and are under way
i ask of you to look at the link below
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_and_structures_in_London#Approved
london has the most busiest airports
if you combine them...............Busiest airports in the world by passenger traffic are Atlanta, Beijing & Dubai, by cargo traffic are Hong Kong, Memphis and Shanghai. But if Heathrow location is close to city then sure it does affect building height limit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_airports_by_passenger_traffic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_busiest_airports_by_cargo_traffic
Yes I agree, these are primary factors. By adding infra/connectivity, urban planners can selectively boost value of a land, which will then become suitable for multi-storey buildings even skyscrapers.must be related to culture and urban planning. There is some countries who forbid the build of highrises on their major cities to preserve their scenic view (like Italy and France)
I was surprised with the stats of Beijing!