What's new

BUDGET 2022: Pentagon Requesting Boost in R&D Funding to Compete with China

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
The Biden administration is proposing a significant increase in Defense Department research-and-development funding for future capabilities while cutting back on procurement spending for today’s systems.

The Pentagon’s fiscal year 2022 budget request, released May 28, calls for $112 billion for its research, development test and evaluation accounts. That would represent a $5.5 billion, or 5 percent, boost over the amount enacted for 2021. It is the largest RDT&E request in the history of the department.

Meanwhile, the fiscal blueprint would slash military procurement by $8 billion, or nearly 6 percent, to $133.6 billion.

The Biden administration is proposing a total of $715 billion for the Defense Department in 2022. That is $11.3 billion, or 1.6 percent, more than was enacted for 2021. The increase is “slightly” less than the anticipated rate of inflation, according to the administration, meaning the budget would slightly decline in inflation-adjusted dollars.

The investment plan comes as the U.S. military casts a wary eye toward China and its military advancements, and the Defense Department moves to acquire next-generation capabilities while cutting back on buying some of the older technologies that aren’t as well suited for a high-end fight.

“China poses the greatest long-term challenge to the United States,” according to the budget proposal. “Accordingly, DoD will prioritize China and its military modernization as our pacing challenge.”

To that end, the Pentagon is “investing in cutting-edge technologies that will deliver new warfighting advantages to our forces,” it added. They include artificial intelligence, hypersonics, cyber and quantum computing, among others.

The department plans to spend over $66 billion on efforts related to the Indo-Pacific region, including for the Pacific Deterrence Initiative, also known as PDI. That includes $5.1 billion in targeted investments aimed at developing and procuring capabilities in support of “joint force lethality,” including precision strike and stand-off systems such as advanced munitions.

The fiscal plan highlights what the Pentagon calls “advanced capability enablers.”

“Modernizing our military requires successful research, technology maturation, prototyping systems integration, and test capability to turn innovative and disruptive technology into fielded and sustainable military systems,” it said.

For 2022, the department is requesting $2.3 billion for microelectronics efforts, which are critical components for the Pentagon’s weapons platforms.

“The U.S. means of domestically producing advanced, assured microelectronics is fragile and threatened,” the budget blueprint said.

Plans to address the problem include: investments in domestic design, fabrication, and packaging capabilities and capacity to improve access to trusted, state-of-the-art microelectronics; increasing options for access to radiation-hardened parts; procuring sufficient quantities of legacy microchips; and expanding coordination across the U.S. government to ensure effective transition of advanced capability microchips into current and next-generation weapons systems.

Meanwhile, about $3.8 billion would go toward hypersonics weapons. The Army, Navy and Air Force are pursuing ground-launched, sea-launched and air-launched versions, respectively.

Artificial intelligence projects would receive $874 million to reflect the “rapidly growing importance of AI in every facet of the department’s operations,” the documents say. That would help fund more than 600 AI-related efforts.

Fifth-generation wireless networks, known as 5G, would get $398 million. The technology is expected to offer a “transformational magnitude of greater network bandwidth and speed, enabling the trillion-sensor world, thereby creating vastly more data from more sensors and sources.” The fast transfer of data could facilitate the U.S. military’s concept of joint all-domain command and control, which aims to link sensors and shooters across the joint force as devices are increasingly linked through a so-called internet of things.

A number of other cross-cutting capability areas would receive substantial funding.

“Modernizing the nation’s nuclear delivery and command, control and communications systems is the department’s number one priority,” the documents say.

The Pentagon’s next-generation nuclear systems would receive a slight bump in 2022 of $200 million, for a total of about $15.1 billion. Efforts include the Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent ($2.6 billion), Long-Range Stand-Off cruise missile ($600 million), Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine ($5 billion), Trident II missile mods ($1.6 billion), B-21 bomber ($3 billion), F-35 dual-capable aircraft systems ($40 million), B61 tail kit ($3 million), and nuclear command, control and communications ($2.9 billion).

Meanwhile, initiatives for missile defense and defeat would receive a total of $20.4 billion to bolster regional and strategic missile defense capabilities and “left-of-launch activities.”

Improving space and cyberspace capabilities are both high priorities for the administration.

The budget request would invest $20.6 billion to enhance U.S. capabilities to deter conflict in space and prevail in a “global all-domain fight,” Vice Adm. Ronald Boxall, director of force structure, resources and assessments for the Joint Staff, said during a Pentagon briefing with reporters.

“China and Russia are challenging U.S. advantage in space by fielding weapons to deny or destroy our space capabilities,” he said. “Lasers, electronic warfare, grappling systems and direct-action projectiles are a few technologies our adversaries have fielded or are developing to blind, jam or destroy U.S. space systems.”

Proposed investments for 2022 would go toward precision navigation and timing signals that will enable GPS-degraded operations, space launch vehicles to provide assured access to space, and proliferated low-Earth orbit data transport and missile warning solutions.

The Pentagon also wants to ensure the ability to succeed in a contested cyber environment, noted Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks. The budget proposal “provides the resources for the department to defend forward, and continues building cyber resiliency and protecting critical infrastructure,” she told reporters.

The Pentagon is requesting $10.4 billion for cyberspace activities. Funding would go toward a variety of efforts including: cryptology modernization and deployment for the next generation of mission systems and platforms; securing information-sharing across multiple security domains; “zero trust” architectures; operationalizing identity and credential access management modernization efforts; and automated continuous endpoint monitoring.

Meanwhile, for the most expensive acquisition program in Pentagon history, the F-35 joint strike fighter, the Biden administration wants to spend $12 billion for 85 planes, down from $12.9 billion enacted in 2021 for 96 of the jets. The Air Force, Marine Corps and Navy are buying A, B and C variants of the aircraft, respectively.

Among the services, the Department of the Air Force — which includes the Space Force — fared best in the budget request in terms of topline funding. It would receive a total of $212.8 billion in 2022, about $8.8 billion more than it was appropriated for 2021.

The Department of the Navy — which includes the Marine Corps — would receive $211.7 billion, or $4.6 billion more than it got for 2021.

The Army fared worst among the services, taking a $1.5 billion cut with a proposed topline of $171.7 billion.

“The department's focus on China requires additional investments for the Navy and Air Force, and the reduction for the Army reflects the president's decision to withdraw all U.S. troops from Afghanistan” by the end of this fiscal year, Pentagon Comptroller Anne McAndrew said during the briefing.

Defense-wide accounts, which include organizations that aren’t nestled under the services such as the Missile Defense Agency and Special Operations Command, would get a total of $117.8 billion, nearly $600 million less than in 2021.

Notably, the Pentagon has yet to release a new future years defense program, or FYDP, for fiscal years 2022-2026. The department normally includes its five-year spending plans when the annual defense budget is submitted.

Mackenzie Eaglen, a defense budget expert at the American Enterprise Institute think tank, said the proposed growth in Pentagon RDT&E funding is a continuation of a trend that’s been unfolding since the final years of the Obama administration.

“This is the new [Biden] team’s emphasis, which is on capability, which tends to be biased towards future investments, which tends to be of course mostly technological,” she said.

However, boosting research-and-development funding won’t be enough as the United States seeks to maintain its edge against China’s military, which continues to modernize, according to Eaglen.

“An emphasis on R&D is not a panacea,” she told National Defense.

“It's time to move programs into production; no more science experiments,” Eaglen said. “We need to start picking winners and losers and building things. It's not enough to simply experiment and prototype for another five years. We don't have that kind of time.”

Eaglen said she’s not opposed to high levels of R&D spending, but the technology needs to transition faster into new procurement programs.

Meanwhile, President Joe Biden’s budget proposal still has to wind its way through Congress, which holds the power of the purse and sets annual military spending levels.

Eaglen said she thinks Congress will eventually appropriate $715 billion or perhaps “slightly” more for the Pentagon in 2022. But it might take a while because lawmakers will be dealing with other bills that are on the front burner. The Biden administration’s budget request also came in historically late. Presidential budget proposals are normally released in early February, not late May.

Fiscal year 2022 begins Oct. 1. Eaglen expects Congress to pass continuing resolutions to keep the U.S. government operating at fiscal year 2021 spending levels until final appropriations bills are passed many months after FY ’22 has already started.

“It's going to be a long time getting there,” she said. “And by a long time, I mean a longer CR than we've seen in recent years. … I think it's going to be more like half a year.”

https://www.nationaldefensemagazine...ing-boost-in-rd-funding-to-compete-with-china
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
They can develop a kind of microbe bio weapon and unleash it in China to take down the China menace once and for all to maintain their global position.
 
.
LOL the Americans are turning into Indians :rofl:





 
. .
LOL the Americans are turning into Indians :rofl:





Seems India has alot of eyes on China 👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀
🤣

Anyway, jokes aside, coming to topic, I think this is just the Indistrial complex gunning for more funds. The Chinese threat to the US is not that pressing as they are making it sound. Just fear mongering to get more funds to be honest . Quite similar to the Soviet union days. However, only difference is that the US had abit more reason to be wary of the Soviets as they were openly seeking world domination and spreading their ideology around the world and gaining influence/foothold across the world . Compared to that, the Chinese are quite mild/reserved to be honest.
 
.
Seems India has alot of eyes on China 👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀
🤣

Anyway, jokes aside, coming to topic, I think this is just the Indistrial complex gunning for more funds. The Chinese threat to the US is not that pressing as they are making it sound. Just fear mongering to get more funds to be honest . Quite similar to the Soviet union days. However, only difference is that the US had abit more reason to be wary of the Soviets as they were openly seeking world domination and spreading their ideology around the world and gaining influence/foothold across the world . Compared to that, the Chinese are quite mild/reserved to be honest.
When the Anglo-Saxons handed off their empire to the Americans in the 1960s, the reigns of power were seized by the Jewish lobby in Washington. The Jewish lobby is not interested in letting the common people know the truth. Their only agenda is to manufacture consent to aid geopolitical machinations that perpetuate their privileged position.
 
.
Seems India has alot of eyes on China 👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀
🤣

Anyway, jokes aside, coming to topic, I think this is just the Indistrial complex gunning for more funds. The Chinese threat to the US is not that pressing as they are making it sound. Just fear mongering to get more funds to be honest . Quite similar to the Soviet union days. However, only difference is that the US had abit more reason to be wary of the Soviets as they were openly seeking world domination and spreading their ideology around the world and gaining influence/foothold across the world . Compared to that, the Chinese are quite mild/reserved to be honest.
No. I can feel the deep fear of US. And the fear is real. Soviet Union's economy relied on oil and minerals. The scale never reached 1/3 of US. China's economy has reached 2/3 of US in nominal GDP. In real purchase power China's economy is at least equivalent to US. More importly China is rapidly catching up in basic scientific research and new industries. China is not far from or a little ahead of US in AI, EV, 5G, quantum technologies, new energies. US can not afford losing the race in these fields ,

China being quiet than Soviet Union is another thing US is afraid of. It means China is much calmer and smarter. If you read the CCP history you would know CCP is a strategy master. US knows it is facing a challenger never seen before.
 
.
No. I can feel the deep fear of US. And the fear is real. Soviet Union's economy relied on oil and minerals. The scale never reached 1/3 of US. China's economy has reached 2/3 of US in nominal GDP. In real purchase power China's economy is at least equivalent to US. More importly China is rapidly catching up in basic scientific research and new industries. China is not far from or a little ahead of US in AI, EV, 5G, quantum technologies, new energies. US can not afford losing the race in these fields ,

China being quiet than Soviet Union is another thing US is afraid of. It means China is much calmer and smarter. If you read the CCP history you would know CCP is a strategy master. US knows it is facing a challenger never seen before.

BRI and China 2025 are the reasons the US is throwing 24/7 brainwashing media campaign of China overtaking US thus becoming a threat. The Pivot of Asia started by Obama was to prevent China rising. Right now the Biden administration is taking a different approach, that is trying to lure Russia away. Too bad for the warmongers, Russia ain't going to be used by the Jews and these anglo saxons. US is certainly afraid of the tech war being waged right now, afraid of an alternative to the swift because sanctioning Russia and China no longer works and other countries will be immune as well. It's a good thing we have a military super power Russia backing China and vice versa as the world's economic super power. Today this alliance is way stronger than the Soviet Union era is and this scares the sheeeeeeet out of the warmongers.
 
.
BRI and China 2025 are the reasons the US is throwing 24/7 brainwashing media campaign of China overtaking US thus becoming a threat. The Pivot of Asia started by Obama was to prevent China rising. Right now the Biden administration is taking a different approach, that is trying to lure Russia away. Too bad for the warmongers, Russia ain't going to be used by the Jews and these anglo saxons. US is certainly afraid of the tech war being waged right now, afraid of an alternative to the swift because sanctioning Russia and China no longer works and other countries will be immune as well. It's a good thing we have a military super power Russia backing China and vice versa as the world's economic super power. Today this alliance is way stronger than the Soviet Union era is and this scares the sheeeeeeet out of the warmongers.
It's too late for US to play nice guy to Russia. Russia did want to join in west side in 1990's. But now Russia knows it will never be accepted by the west.
 
.
It's too late for US to play nice guy to Russia. Russia did want to join in west side in 1990's. But now Russia knows it will never be accepted by the west.
The war in Yugoslavia, the encroachment of East European countries joining NATO and the Baltic countries too, the missile defense system directing at Russia, trying to have Ukraine join NATO all these hostilities have woken up the Russians and Putin.
 
.
Seems India has alot of eyes on China 👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀
🤣

Anyway, jokes aside, coming to topic, I think this is just the Indistrial complex gunning for more funds. The Chinese threat to the US is not that pressing as they are making it sound. Just fear mongering to get more funds to be honest . Quite similar to the Soviet union days. However, only difference is that the US had abit more reason to be wary of the Soviets as they were openly seeking world domination and spreading their ideology around the world and gaining influence/foothold across the world . Compared to that, the Chinese are quite mild/reserved to be honest.

China threat toward US domination is real. USSR never reached the level that China has achieved in term of research, technology and economy. China patent production has already surpass US's by far, and the number citation of the research produced by China is not far from those of US. Not to mention their engineers/pool of talents surpass that of US and Europe combined, and China's R&D budget is about to surpass that of US too, if US doesnt increase the R&D budget significantly.
 
.
LOL the Americans are turning into Indians :rofl:





The end of America is India :omghaha: :omghaha: :omghaha:
 
.
They can develop a kind of microbe bio weapon and unleash it in China to take down the China menace once and for all to maintain their global position.

One day you praise Chinese drones and other weapons and say how Azerbaijan is going to be destroyed with the Armenian procured Chinese drones with help of money donated by Kim Kardashian. The other day you label China a menace and hope USA take it down once and for all ??

Split personality , or lack of opinion or just an idiot.
 
.
No. I can feel the deep fear of US. And the fear is real. Soviet Union's economy relied on oil and minerals. The scale never reached 1/3 of US. China's economy has reached 2/3 of US in nominal GDP. In real purchase power China's economy is at least equivalent to US. More importly China is rapidly catching up in basic scientific research and new industries. China is not far from or a little ahead of US in AI, EV, 5G, quantum technologies, new energies. US can not afford losing the race in these fields ,

China being quiet than Soviet Union is another thing US is afraid of. It means China is much calmer and smarter. If you read the CCP history you would know CCP is a strategy master. US knows it is facing a challenger never seen before.

China threat toward US domination is real. USSR never reached the level that China has achieved in term of research, technology and economy. China patent production has already surpass US's by far, and the number citation of the research produced by China is not far from those of US. Not to mention their engineers/pool of talents surpass that of US and Europe combined, and China's R&D budget is about to surpass that of US too, if US doesnt increase the R&D budget significantly.

Russia only had its first village Moscow in the middle ages. China is the world's oldest continuous civilization dating back to 2000 BC. Don't compare Russian barbarians with civilized Chinese. Apples and oranges. :china:

@F-22Raptor
 
Last edited:
.
Russia only had its first village Moscow in the middle ages. China is the world's oldest continuous civilization dating back to 2000 BC. Don't compare Russian barbarians with civilized Chinese. Apples and oranges. :china:

@F-22Raptor
宋子文 Tse-ven Soong( Chiang Kai Shek's brother in law), as the representative of Republic of China, in 1945 went to Moscow to sign China-Soviet Union treaty. He carefully observed Russian people and drew a conclusion: Russians can not compete with Chinese. Russia was at its strongest and China was at weakest time In 1945. But he still believed China will surpass Russia in the future.

1242.jpg
 
.
Back
Top Bottom