What's new

Brits would rather have been born Indian

Punjabbi Munda

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
1,794
Reaction score
0
History really has come full circle. Buffeted by a near-triple dip recession, a whopping third of all Britons say their economic prospects would have been better if they had been born in India.

In fact, it seems Brits would rather have been born in India than anywhere else!
After six years of economic hardship, 32% of people surveyed in a year-long ‘Future of Britain’ study named India as their preferred country of birth, with the figure rising to 36% among 16-24 year-olds.

India beat off not only the other major emerging economies, but the US too. Cool Brazil was the choice of 29% of those polled, followed by Russia (28%), China (27%) and the US (26%), according to the study conducted by the communications agency OMD UK.

“Certainly, the view here is that among the growth economies, India is doing rather well,” Chris Worrell, the author of the study, told HT.

“It’s not that people are rushing to exit England, but there is a sense of people being aware that Britain is no longer the power that it was economically, and that growth will be driven by new economies.”

The study reveals a nation in survival mode, with 41% expecting the 2-5 more years of recession.

But young Britons emerge as far less pessimistic than 35-55 year-olds: “Younger people are more outward looking and receptive to other cultures,” said Worrell.

However, rather than being defeatist, the slump is bringing out British qualities last seen during World War II – people are saving more, eating out less, buying only necessities, cancelling gym memberships, selling off possessions and taking up second jobs.Brits would rather have been born Indian - Hindustan Times
 
. . . . .
No offense, but why would anyone want to be born an Indian ?! :confused:


Well i agree that quality of life in India is not a good as britain, but it's still better to be born in a more dynamic, economically vibrant and developing country than an aging and dying nation like Britain.

I was going to say the same. :rofl:


Yup for now this statement is valid, but with the upcoming metros, highrises, malls and highways in all major Indian cities maybe 5 yrs later we might be saying the opposite. ;)

But for now life in India is battle. I just returned from India last week. Spent some time in Punjab and also went to Mumbai. All I can say is that we still have a long distance to cover.
 
. .
Well i agree that quality of life in India is not a good as britain, but it's still better to be born in a more dynamic, economically vibrant and developing country than an aging and dying nation like Britain.




Yup for now this statement is valid, but with the upcoming metros, highrises, malls and highways in all major Indian cities maybe 5 yrs later we might be saying the opposite. ;)

But for now life in India is battle. I just returned from India last week. Spent some time in Punjab and also went to Mumbai. All I can say is that we still have a long distance to cover.

if you are rich, you can have a good quality of life in upcoming Indian cities (not metros). May be even better than UK.
I would prefer east asian countries though.
 
.
i never got it why brits like india. i personally like briton more.

No offense, but why would anyone want to be born an Indian ?! :confused:

Thats the same question my friend kept asking himself. but one day he left for qatar, stayed in the Arab world for 2 months. when he returned to india, he kissed the ground. so my guess is despite the lack of oil money, india gives a sense of freedom and liberty very few countries offer
 
.
i never got it why brits like india. i personally like briton more.



Thats the same question my friend kept asking himself. but one day he left for qatar, stayed in the Arab world for 2 months. when he returned to india, he kissed the ground. so my guess is despite the lack of oil money, india gives a sense of freedom and liberty very few countries offer
that was a bit filmy.. :lol:
 
.
No offense, but why would anyone want to be born an Indian ?! :confused:

i also thought of same when i read todays newspaper...rather i read it twice...:confused:
might b they like diversity, culture &environment(places like kerala himachal etc) or they love a fast pace life!!
we can only guess...only those 32% know y they think so...they might hav a different view of India!! :rolleyes:
 
. . .
Why not Singapore?

@Wright Honestly speaking, probably some Brits dont even know where Singapore is :rofl: Not really kidding...They are not even sure where Malaysia is unless they have been there or have a friend who has...Nope am not even talking about layman am talking about proper researchers some of whom thought Malaysia was in the Middle East! Am not sure...is it their Geography teacher or their syllabus doesn't have much to offer except the Western side of the globe and maybe Australia :blink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
History really has come full circle. Buffeted by a near-triple dip recession, a whopping third of all Britons say their economic prospects would have been better if they had been born in India.

In fact, it seems Brits would rather have been born in India than anywhere else!
After six years of economic hardship, 32% of people surveyed in a year-long ‘Future of Britain’ study named India as their preferred country of birth, with the figure rising to 36% among 16-24 year-olds.

India beat off not only the other major emerging economies, but the US too. Cool Brazil was the choice of 29% of those polled, followed by Russia (28%), China (27%) and the US (26%), according to the study conducted by the communications agency OMD UK.

“Certainly, the view here is that among the growth economies, India is doing rather well,” Chris Worrell, the author of the study, told HT.

“It’s not that people are rushing to exit England, but there is a sense of people being aware that Britain is no longer the power that it was economically, and that growth will be driven by new economies.”

The study reveals a nation in survival mode, with 41% expecting the 2-5 more years of recession.

But young Britons emerge as far less pessimistic than 35-55 year-olds: “Younger people are more outward looking and receptive to other cultures,” said Worrell.

However, rather than being defeatist, the slump is bringing out British qualities last seen during World War II – people are saving more, eating out less, buying only necessities, cancelling gym memberships, selling off possessions and taking up second jobs.Brits would rather have been born Indian - Hindustan Times

Nahhh...I dont think so...Not sure how they conducted this "so-called" survey ...The last para seems to show that this is slightly biased article...The only people who are actually bothered about the recessions are those who talk about it on the bus....the whole journey they will criticize it then once off the bus they are back to normal life...Shopping, taking loans, living ignorantly and complaining how foreigners are taking up their jobs (Hear this esp from the ignorant high school drop outs)...Apart from that the working class is as ignorant about the recession as can be...or they just do not acknowledge it...not sure why they are going to come out right to a study....

And out of all the places...I think they would prob choose to be born in some Scandinavian country and even then will complain about the cold...
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom