Britain says to "beef up" defence of disputed Falkland Islands

[Dalit]

No, not heard any mention of this on any news outlet and doubt I will, its fairly problem free here at the moment. It was there dodgy leader who was using it again last year and earlier this year.

And the Pak above, you gave no reasons why it belongs to Argentina, it belonged to the Spanish empire and then the British, never Argentina who would most likely just turn it into an offshore cocaine distribution centre.

LOL @ "belonged" to them... You make it sound like the Brits are the legitimate and rightful owners of the island. Just because invaders occupy lands doesn't make it theirs. We know how Britain plundered and looted half of the world. We're not that crazy on this forum. Besides, if we go by your logic, the US belongs to the native Americans. After all, they were there before the "founding fathers" settled in by the use of force.

Whether Argentina existed or not is irrelevant. If the Falkland Islands don't belong to Argentina they certainly don't belong to Britain. Let me just put it that way. What more reason do you need?

 

[Penguin]

NSM ?

Norwegian Kongsberg Naval Strike Missile (NSM)

View vid: Norwegian Navy Naval Strike Missile (NSM)

 

[rockstarIN]

It all depends upon the fire power. If that is the case, goa pondicheri etc should be Portugal and french places by now. Another example is Hong Kong. If Argentina is power full enough to make the deal un affordable for Brits, they can have it else they can only do is to buy some potent anti ship missiles ( p 800 Brahmos class) in order to bleed Brits with equal and very costly counter measures