@Soulspeek Impressive i must say but i fail to see how a country with many a times less poulation is supposed to generate huge revenues on movies?
And i can use the same logic on tejas, sitara AMCA BCAM LCMA so spare me the BS...
Also our operational missile capability is on par or greater than india. Meaning to say we have more means to transfer our nuclear weapons from their cozy sofas to somewhere in Delhi...
What operational missile capability ?
We have A3,A5 & canisterized Shaurya operational.
Indigenous SAM too is operational
BMD,two SLBMs & a JV LRSAM/MRSAM underway
What do you have ? Shaheen 2 ?
I never implied my country made the turbojet (or the specific kind of propelling hardware) for babur... We licensed it from China, but ten years after i have little idea what could be going in our labs... of course we are looking beyond now...
Now i get why india is called the rape capital hopefully you too will make your country proud, as far as i am concerned i am better off with my girlfriend...
you repeated my post and you blame me for not understanding it? only an idiot would underestimate the brahmos. But the fact that it is actually russian hardware remains intact. Russia has not granted you all the tech necessary to develop the critical parts of brahmos as they don't want to lose a potential buyer. But you're trying and someday you might succeed if not already.
What makes you so sure?
The first batch was given hand to hand all that collaboration talk is BS of the highest degree...
Even today,there is no institute having enough expertise to design a turbojet/turbofan in Pakistan.
Many of your compatriots would love to make fun of the Kaveri turbofan ,but at least we have a decent working engine as a result of 4 decades of research & development.
And you are not at the same level as we were in the 70s.
Nirbhay is not 'undevelopable'-Was Bulava SLBM undevelopable for the Russians ?How many times did it fail ?Indian missiles & space launchers had their own fair share of failures,like the rest of the world.
You mean to imply that Pakistani missiles haven't failed ? Remember the case of 'mysterious daadu' falling on villagers ? The difference between India and Pakistan is this transparency regarding development procedure.
Indian members have posted the indigenously developed systems on the Brahmos several times before.Obviously these are systems where India has expertise in, like navigation systems,launchers,fcs & now,seekers .
Let me ask one question-What did Pakistan-a country that doesn't even have a single indigenous aircraft design contribute to the development of JF 17?In which field of aircraft design do you have experience in ?Does that stop you making claims of a joint venture ?
As per a only two major technologies haven't been shared - the ramjet technology & the high specific impulse solid propellent for the booster .The russians did offer ToT for Ramjet technology,ata hefty price.And FYI we are alreadypursuing development of an infigenous liquid fuel ramjet.
And Brahmos is a far better collaborative effort than the JF 17 for which Pakistan couldn't even develop a simple IFF interogator.Even an HAL upgraded Mig 27 would have more indigenous content than this 'Joint Fighter'