SP!TF!R3
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2012
- Messages
- 631
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
(XF-85 Goblin parasite fighter)
LOL..the very name is extremely ugly.. Racist maker..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
(XF-85 Goblin parasite fighter)
Obviously the criterion should never be aesthetics or 'beauty'beautiful jet perfect for USAF.
i don't know why they selected F-35.
Failed or rejected whatever its gonna be decades ahead with anything india can come up with in future.
and what about pak hu..
1st look at your own house then comment on others
at least we can make or build something.
what you came up till now cannot be compared to any one in the world because nobody makes that type of crap to compare with.
oh.. my mistakeDude, i am indian.
Dont act like pakistanis, judging others.
A happy aircraft, and actually more innovative than its Lockheed competitor in many ways. Clearly designed around the STOVL version engine. Wonder how that would have translate to air force and navy versions. I like it.
Now this, this is ugly (XF-85 Goblin parasite fighter)
And this (Saunders-Roe SR.A/1)
If F35 is nicknamed the Lightening
This would be nicknamed the Fatlady
I don't see what is racist about 'Goblin'. If you have a problem with 'parasite fighter', then that's because your interpretation is flawed (the aircraft is the parasite, not its target). Here's the concept illustrated:LOL..the very name is extremely ugly.. Racist maker..
it looks pretty cool when looking from above.
if the F-32 would of cost 1/2 to 1/3 less than the F-35, think we should of went for that instead