Boeing 737 MAX Crash (explained by Aviation expert)

[@@@]

We have recently heard the news of the crash of the relatively new mid-range/"super welter-weight" aircraft from Boeing, the 737 MAX 8. There has been two major crashes (both due to same reason), each taking 100+ lives each.

Boeing will say "it is not our problem". Airlines will say "it is not our problem". The former blames the latter for improper training whilst the latter blames the former for engineering failure.

The only way how this can be found out is by through examination of the Boeing 737 MAX flying manuals provided by manufacturer Boeing themselves to see if they even include something precautionary that could've been linked to the two crashes, and possibly prevented them.

As an aviation enthusiast, I refrain from commenting which side is the wrong one. But I can say however, it was pretty stupid from Boeing from going over-board with technological features in the MAX aircraft.

The "feature" of the MAX aircraft that caused it to crash was the automated system that dives the nose of the aircraft in event of a stalling. Unfortunately, this system was triggered somehow during the takeoff of the unfortunate flights, and caused both jets to crash tremendously horrible on the grounds.

As Donald Trump said:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1105468569800839169

I can safely say that I agree with this man.

 

[Pakhtoon yum]

We have recently heard the news of the crash of the relatively new mid-range/"super welter-weight" aircraft from Boeing, the 737 MAX 8. There has been two major crashes (both due to same reason), each taking 100+ lives each.

Boeing will say "it is not our problem". Airlines will say "it is not our problem". The former blames the latter for improper training whilst the latter blames the former for engineering failure.

The only way how this can be found out is by through examination of the Boeing 737 MAX flying manuals provided by manufacturer Boeing themselves to see if they even include something precautionary that could've been linked to the two crashes, and possibly prevented them.

As an aviation enthusiast, I refrain from commenting which side is the wrong one. But I can say however, it was pretty stupid from Boeing from going over-board with technological features in the MAX aircraft.

The "feature" of the MAX aircraft that caused it to crash was the automated system that dives the nose of the aircraft in event of a stalling. Unfortunately, this system was triggered somehow during the takeoff of the unfortunate flights, and caused both jets to crash tremendously horrible on the grounds.

As Donald Trump said:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1105468569800839169

I can safely say that I agree with this man.

I support his claim, he is being perfectly rational for once.

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

To cut costs the number of experienced engineers are drastically cut, work load is increased, test iterations are decreased, verifications are forefeited etc. only to make the upper management and major stock holders even richer.....

 

[@@@]

To cut costs the number of experienced engineers are drastically cut, work load is increased, test iterations are decreased, verifications are forefeited etc. only to make the upper management and major stock holders even richer.....

These products are "fast-tracked" un-necessarily to fill their pockets in the nearest fiscal them. Second-class engineering is used perhaps (Chinese) in dirty plants in Shanghai. Foregoing the revolutionary years of Boeing in which everything was produced by American and European resources. It's a cheap world nowadays.

 

[Mughal-Prince]

These products are "fast-tracked" un-necessarily to fill their pockets in the nearest fiscal them. Second-class engineering is used perhaps (Chinese) in dirty plants in Shanghai. Foregoing the revolutionary years of Boeing in which everything was produced by American and European resources. It's a cheap world nowadays.

WTF did you mentioned "(Chinese) in dirty plants in Shanghai" here for no reason ??? Did you understand what actually has happen and at what level it happen ??? It seems you have not an iota of clue.

 

[MIG21DOWN]

If its Boeing i aint going.

 

[@@@]

WTF did you mentioned "(Chinese) in dirty plants in Shanghai" here for no reason ??? Did you understand what actually has happen and at what level it happen ??? It seems you have not an iota of clue.

The point is that Boeing is shifting eastwards for cheap labors. The result is sub-standard engineering and products. Contrary to their history.

 

[MIG21DOWN]

The point is that Boeing is shifting eastwards for cheap labors. The result is sub-standard engineering and products. Contrary to their prestigious history.

Boeing is an example of American crony capitalism where peoples lives are put on the line for Profit. Boeing specifically lobbied the United States to make it so their new max plane didnt need new training for a normal 737 pilot as this would get them more sales.

 

[Mughal-Prince]

The point is that Boeing is shifting eastwards for cheap labors. The result is sub-standard engineering and products. Contrary to their prestigious history.

Brother I did know that but still the higher level of designing and engineering is performed in west and all the testing before commissioning is done there. Also all the test cases been made by mighty super dupper Boeing facility in west. That's seems a simple case of exception handling in autopilot system and IMO its the Boeing fault from west not from east brother.

 

[@@@]

Boeing is an example of American crony capitalism where peoples lives are put on the line for Profit. Boeing specifically lobbied the United States to make it so their new max plane didnt need new training for a normal 737 pilot as this would get them more sales.

One thing is for sure. These capitalists are very crony, and getting more crony by the day.

 

[Dungeness]

These products are "fast-tracked" un-necessarily to fill their pockets in the nearest fiscal them. Second-class engineering is used perhaps (Chinese) in dirty plants in Shanghai. Foregoing the revolutionary years of Boeing in which everything was produced by American and European resources. It's a cheap world nowadays.

Why are you blaming on Chinese? It is this guy who is in charge of Boeing Software division, and he doesn't look like Chinese to me:

 

[Mughal-Prince]

@Dewaneh On the other hand if you look at China they are taking longer then expected with their Comac 919.

 

[@@@]

Why are you blaming on Chinese? It is this guy who is in charge of Boeing Software division, and he doesn't look like Chinese to me:

Indians and Chinese are of the same fold, at least from the American perspective. It is just that Indians tend to be in more managerial positions. Both lack in innovation and are of cheap quality.

 

[Beast]

@Dewaneh On the other hand if you look at China they are taking longer then expected with their Comac 919.

His aim is not to find root of problem but just smear the Chinese for anything. Be it good or bad.

 

[@@@]

@Dewaneh On the other hand if you look at China they are taking longer then expected with their Comac 919.

Could it be that they struggling to produce it all by themselves? I am sure a lot of that aircraft is stolen engineering.