Bihar for Biharis!

[TopCat]

Many urdu speaking muslims from north India took part in process that made pakistan.
I dont see how its fair to kick out the very people who spearheaded the agitation for separate homeland for muslims.
besides after all these days, is it not racism to call urdu speaking people to leave bangladesh?

He probably talking about the people who did not show allegiance to Bangladesh and still hold Pakistani citizenship.
Those who opted for Bangladeshi citizenship in 1972 had no problem whatsoever. In 2008 high court again gave blanket citizenship to the people who born or was minor in 1971.

But again its an optional offer and people have to take the citizenship by their own wish. Those who still wants to go back they should be repatriated instead of kicking out. I dont think there are too many left who really wants to go back, probably few hundreds who still gets monthly ration from government and dont want to loose that by accepting BD citizenship.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Did some Bangali ever mistreat you ? This much hatred for a Pakistani toward Bangladesh and Bangladeshis as a nation is unusual.

یہ زیادہ بنگالیوں کی طرف نفرت

I dont hate bangalis.. heck i dont even hate the indians... but lets face it .. thts the truth... you talk abt Pakistani soldiers killing bangali intellectuals... the survivors of those killings (which by the way happened after Pak surrender) claim the men who were involved in abductions and killing were bengalis.... you claim Paks killed the bangali hindus.. the bangali hindus claim that it was the bangali muslim that was harassing them,asking for money,rice and women.. it was the bangali muslim who was occupying their houses n looting them...

Bangladesh claim Pakistanis killed 3 million and raped 200,000 women.... with total number of uniformed men being 34,000 in East Pakistan... fighting a civil war in a country of 75 million people and india (which was directly involved in combat since march) how can they kill so many? I can go on and on ....

I think your wholesale characterization of Bangalis as harassers and killers above is inaccurate and biased, I won't go into a debate about proving or disproving your theory because the argument itself is so out of place that it doesn't hold water. The more important question is why is there a bias?

Hate comes in many colors. I think your hate is the kind that is borne out of ignorance and dogma.

Il gave you legit examples... if they are not true than what are? You talk abt military operation on march 25th.. but forget the parallel govt mujib was running till than? Il give you another example .. what happened on 3rd March? who were looting shops,resturants.cinemas etc owned by non bangalis? what did bangalis do at santahar?at Mymensingh?Joydevpur and Gazipur on 25th march?at the Cresent jute mil khulnal? at Mew colony,Khalispur and so on?

Or what happened even after 16 december 1971??

Sir its not all that simple... I request you to do some research... and not believe your propoganda history... but neutral sources..

It was the Urdu speaking biharis in Calcutta (they still are the majority muslim in calcutta) started the fight, Bengalis joined the fray later on when they found their owns were getting killed as well.

See my post above... as for mass killings... yes it has been 4 decades... and you have yet yo prove 20,000 dead forget 3 million....

And mind telling us what biharis from bihar were doing in Bangali inciting violence??? it was the bangali tht started the killing ... you are welcome to search on this issue..

And it is the Bengali Muslim who sided with Hindu when you started killing them en-mass in 1971. It is the Bengali who still live with Hindus whereas in Pakistan there are no more Hindus. Bengalis are more tolerant than any other ethnic group in sub continent. Get a life.

Oh do they?

IRIN Asia | Minorities targeted in Bangladesh political violence | Bangladesh | Governance | Human Rights

Pakistan never had so many hindus.. most resided in than East Pakistan... just as no muslim reside in indian punjab... and yes we have extremism.. zias islamisation campaign has been our curse..

And do ask your elders if they faced any discrimination from the West Pakistanis..... and do know tht many bangali officers of the Pak army remained loyal till the end and are living in Pakistan today as Proud Pakistanis.. while their own brothers(literaly) served the muktis/deserters... if the west Pakistanis were racists there wouldnt be bangali officers supporting a united Pakistan... nor would there still be 2.5 million illegal bangladeshis still living in my country.

 

[TopCat]

I dont hate bangalis.. heck i dont even hate the indians... but lets face it .. thts the truth... you talk abt Pakistani soldiers killing bangali intellectuals... the survivors of those killings (which by the way happened after Pak surrender) claim the men who were involved in abductions and killing were bengalis.... you claim Paks killed the bangali hindus.. the bangali hindus claim that it was the bangali muslim that was harassing them,asking for money,rice and women.. it was the bangali muslim who was occupying their houses n looting them...

Bangladesh claim Pakistanis killed 3 million and raped 200,000 women.... with total number of uniformed men being 34,000 in East Pakistan... fighting a civil war in a country of 75 million people and india (which was directly involved in combat since march) how can they kill so many? I can go on and on ....



Il gave you legit examples... if they are not true than what are? You talk abt military operation on march 25th.. but forget the parallel govt mujib was running till than? Il give you another example .. what happened on 3rd March? who were looting shops,resturants.cinemas etc owned by non bangalis? what did bangalis do at santahar?at Mymensingh?Joydevpur and Gazipur on 25th march?at the Cresent jute mil khulnal? at Mew colony,Khalispur and so on?

Sir its not all that simple... I request you to do some research... and not believe your propoganda history... but neutral sources..




See my post above... as for mass killings... yes it has been 4 decades... and you have yet yo prove 20,000 dead forget 3 million....

And mind telling us what biharis from bihar were doing in Bangali inciting violence??? it was the bangali tht started the killing ... you are welcome to search on this issue..




Oh do they?

IRIN Asia | Minorities targeted in Bangladesh political violence | Bangladesh | Governance | Human Rights

Pakistan never had so many hindus.. most resided in than East Pakistan... just as no muslim reside in indian punjab... and yes we have extremism.. zias islamisation campaign has been our curse..

And do ask your elders if they faced any discrimination from the West Pakistanis..... and do know tht many bangali officers of the Pak army remained loyal till the end and are living in Pakistan today as Proud Pakistanis.. while their own brothers(literaly) served the muktis/deserters... if the west Pakistanis were racists there wouldnt be bangali officers supporting a united Pakistan... nor would there still be 2.5 million illegal bangladeshis still living in my country.

Are you still in High School?

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Are you still in High School?

Is that the best arguement you can come up with my friend?

 

[Lord ZeN]

Take back your 12 million illegal BD pole vaulters.Then we will provide safe passage to 1.5 million Muslim Biharis to travel back to Pakiatan. Since they migrated in 1947 to reach Pak.

 

[Kinetic]

Bangladesh has a major illegal Bihari problem. These illegal foreign language speaking goons have been occupying major real estate in the heart of Dhaka and draining our resources, it is a strain to our economy since we are hardly a rich nation. Time has arrived, we take this issue to genocidal Modi, since he is the ultimate bloke to solve all illegal immigrant problems. A bengali nationalist Awami league MP has already killed a couple of them to show their rightful place is in Bihar, not in Bangladesh, we are heading in the right direction it appears.

Here goes the muslim brotherhood!!!!

And they talk about gaza ie thousands of kms away!!!

 

[khair_ctg]

It was the Urdu speaking biharis in Calcutta (they still are the majority muslim in calcutta) started the fight, Bengalis joined the fray later on when they found their owns were getting killed as well.
And it is the Bengali Muslim who sided with Hindu when you started killing them en-mass in 1971. It is the Bengali who still live with Hindus whereas in Pakistan there are no more Hindus. Bengalis are more tolerant than any other ethnic group in sub continent. Get a life.

being Urdu-speaking does not automatically mean someone is "Bihari". educated Bengali Muslims have traditionally practiced Urdu before the political stigma started after 1947, and most Bengali Muslim traditions got targeted in the hatred for West Pakistan by Bengali leftists. you have to be nuts to say the Bengali Muslims of pre-1947 Calcutta were "Bihari". by that account Sheikh Mujib ur-Rahman was also "Bihari". also the fact that Kazi Nazr ul Islam was actually of Bihari background shows how mixed up especially the Muslims of Bengal-Bihar-Orissa regions have been for ages.

"Bengali Muslim who sided with Hindu". Bengali Muslims were made to work for Hindus and give up their national interests they achieved in 1947 to Hindus or Indians. i guess Bengali Hindus are okay. but a strange Bengali linguistic extremism exists among Bengali Muslims or ones who appear as such (based on a language that's not even ours). that is as intolerant as can be

Did some Bangali ever mistreat you ? This much hatred for a Pakistani toward Bangladesh and Bangladeshis as a nation is unusual.

یہ زیادہ بنگالیوں کی طرف نفرت

I think your wholesale characterization of Bangalis as harassers and killers above is inaccurate and biased, I won't go into a debate about proving or disproving your theory because the argument itself is so out of place that it doesn't hold water. The more important question is why is there a bias?

Hate comes in many colors. I think your hate is the kind that is borne out of ignorance and dogma.

i think there has to be a serious realistic revision of our own concept of history. because the little history we know about ourselves is so fake and defying logic and reality. we cannot accuse Desert Fighter of hatred in the very hateful thread opened by a Bengali Nationalist not just about stateless refugees, but an entire section of Bangladeshi people

 

[khair_ctg]

India is a secular land and so is Bangladesh. These illegal Biharis belong in Bihar.

it's you who hates Mohajirs. so you should also hate the country the Mohajirs struggled for and inconvenient for you, that country happens to be Bangladesh

 

[dray]

I dont hate bangalis.. heck i dont even hate the indians... but lets face it .. thts the truth... you talk abt Pakistani soldiers killing bangali intellectuals... the survivors of those killings (which by the way happened after Pak surrender) claim the men who were involved in abductions and killing were bengalis.... you claim Paks killed the bangali hindus.. the bangali hindus claim that it was the bangali muslim that was harassing them,asking for money,rice and women.. it was the bangali muslim who was occupying their houses n looting them...

In 1971, the killing, rape, & looting were done jointly by both Pakistani army and East Pakistani Razakar now known as Jamat-e-Islami Bangladesh.

However, East Pakistani/Bangladeshi Muslims, both Bihari & Bengali, can proudly claim the entire credit for the genocide, looting, and mass-exodus (One of the biggest in World history) of Bengali Hindus of Bangladesh in 1946-47.

Bangladesh claim Pakistanis killed 3 million and raped 200,000 women.... with total number of uniformed men being 34,000 in East Pakistan... fighting a civil war in a country of 75 million people and india (which was directly involved in combat since march) how can they kill so many? I can go on and on ....

PA+Bangladeshi Razakar were somewhere around 100,000, India took 93000 as POW. Now, the war continued for 9 months, if each of them killed 1 person each month, then the number reaches close to a million. So it is not impossible.

The real number may or may not be as high as 3 million, but the numbers were very high without any doubt.

Il gave you legit examples... if they are not true than what are? You talk abt military operation on march 25th.. but forget the parallel govt mujib was running till than? Il give you another example .. what happened on 3rd March? who were looting shops,resturants.cinemas etc owned by non bangalis? what did bangalis do at santahar?at Mymensingh?Joydevpur and Gazipur on 25th march?at the Cresent jute mil khulnal? at Mew colony,Khalispur and so on?

Or what happened even after 16 december 1971??

Sir its not all that simple... I request you to do some research... and not believe your propoganda history... but neutral sources..

Mukti Bahini did attack the Razakars and their sympathizers.

See my post above... as for mass killings... yes it has been 4 decades... and you have yet yo prove 20,000 dead forget 3 million....

Nobody in Bangladesh bothered much about it since most of the victims were Hindus. In fact, some Bangladeshis here in PDF have expressed their pleasure about it.

And mind telling us what biharis from bihar were doing in Bangali inciting violence??? it was the bangali tht started the killing ... you are welcome to search on this issue..

Kolkata had/has many Bihari Muslims, but Bengali Muslims were very much involved in the violence during 1946-47.

Oh do they?

IRIN Asia | Minorities targeted in Bangladesh political violence | Bangladesh | Governance | Human Rights

Pakistan never had so many hindus.. most resided in than East Pakistan... just as no muslim reside in indian punjab... and yes we have extremism.. zias islamisation campaign has been our curse..

Some Bangladeshis here are trying to project themselves as a nation of tolerant, truly secular, minority loving people, the real picture is far from that.

Declining Hindu population in Bangladesh region
Year Percentage (%)
1941 28.0
1951 22.0
1961 18.5
1974 13.5
1981 12.13
1991 11.62
2001 9.6

2014 5-6%??

 

[the just]

I dont hate bangalis.. heck i dont even hate the indians... but lets face it .. thts the truth... you talk abt Pakistani soldiers killing bangali intellectuals... the survivors of those killings (which by the way happened after Pak surrender) claim the men who were involved in abductions and killing were bengalis.... you claim Paks killed the bangali hindus.. the bangali hindus claim that it was the bangali muslim that was harassing them,asking for money,rice and women.. it was the bangali muslim who was occupying their houses n looting them...

Bangladesh claim Pakistanis killed 3 million and raped 200,000 women.... with total number of uniformed men being 34,000 in East Pakistan... fighting a civil war in a country of 75 million people and india (which was directly involved in combat since march) how can they kill so many? I can go on and on ....



Il gave you legit examples... if they are not true than what are? You talk abt military operation on march 25th.. but forget the parallel govt mujib was running till than? Il give you another example .. what happened on 3rd March? who were looting shops,resturants.cinemas etc owned by non bangalis? what did bangalis do at santahar?at Mymensingh?Joydevpur and Gazipur on 25th march?at the Cresent jute mil khulnal? at Mew colony,Khalispur and so on?

Or what happened even after 16 december 1971??

Sir its not all that simple... I request you to do some research... and not believe your propoganda history... but neutral sources..




See my post above... as for mass killings... yes it has been 4 decades... and you have yet yo prove 20,000 dead forget 3 million....

And mind telling us what biharis from bihar were doing in Bangali inciting violence??? it was the bangali tht started the killing ... you are welcome to search on this issue..




Oh do they?

IRIN Asia | Minorities targeted in Bangladesh political violence | Bangladesh | Governance | Human Rights

Pakistan never had so many hindus.. most resided in than East Pakistan... just as no muslim reside in indian punjab... and yes we have extremism.. zias islamisation campaign has been our curse..

And do ask your elders if they faced any discrimination from the West Pakistanis..... and do know tht many bangali officers of the Pak army remained loyal till the end and are living in Pakistan today as Proud Pakistanis.. while their own brothers(literaly) served the muktis/deserters... if the west Pakistanis were racists there wouldnt be bangali officers supporting a united Pakistan... nor would there still be 2.5 million illegal bangladeshis still living in my country.

Wrong DATA...check
discrimination... Check
Racism.... Check
Political pressure for superior race to control the country... Check
Killing of minority... Check
Tacking advantage of national resource for funding to kill its own citizens... Check
Leaving the east side practically in hand to mouth situation... Check
Its not me man.That's what historians says.all firangi by the way.
But ,there are few things I agree with you,
1 - The actual numbers of people who died in the war from both sides is a mystery. I don't believe the 3 mill myth either, because its not statistically possible.
2 - Urdu speaking bihari or bangla speaking Bangladeshi all were ready to fight Urdu speaking pakistananis ,this should be the most telling clue of all.have you ever asked your forefathers, WHY?
3 - Taking your advice I did try to find in Page's of history, when actually Bangalis started the killing? And surprise surprise, it started right after March 26 ,when PAK army killed innocent people on the streets.
4 - Also tried to find about 3 rd March.Locals rioting against local shop keepers who used to get unjustified gov ration and subsidiaries because they are Urdu speaking Pakistanis.
5 - True and true about Crescent jute mill and Newsprint mill in Khulna.Others not so.
It was actually the Star jute mill Rupsha Khulna that 37 Pakistani government officials were butchered and thrown into Rupsha river.
My uncle was Zonal GM there,at that time.the workers ratio for bangalis vs biharis were 2/4.5
Anyway some of this thing are really unforgettable for people who actually witnessed it.if you are interested I will tell my uncle to call you when next time he is in Karachi or Lahore. He has a partnership with one of your known mill there.
PS.indian army actively joined Freedom fighters and independent army of Bangladesh after the monsoon. That is end of October.
They provided training and arms in/from April.Till then we were on our own.
So I think in this context we known better than Pakistan and india ,what fighting for freedom means.

 

[khair_ctg]

Wrong DATA...check
discrimination... Check
Racism.... Check
Political pressure for superior race to control the country... Check
Killing of minority... Check
Tacking advantage of national resource for funding to kill its own citizens... Check
Leaving the east side practically in hand to mouth situation... Check
Its not me man.That's what historians says.all firangi by the way.
But ,there are few things I agree with you,
1 - The actual numbers of people who died in the war from both sides is a mystery. I don't believe the 3 mill myth either, because its not statistically possible.
2 - Urdu speaking bihari or bangla speaking Bangladeshi all were ready to fight Urdu speaking pakistananis ,this should be the most telling clue of all.have you ever asked your forefathers, WHY?
3 - Taking your advice I did try to find in Page's of history, when actually Bangalis started the killing? And surprise surprise, it started right after March 26 ,when PAK army killed innocent people on the streets.
4 - Also tried to find about 3 rd March.Locals rioting against local shop keepers who used to get unjustified gov ration and subsidiaries because they are Urdu speaking Pakistanis.
5 - True and true about Crescent jute mill and Newsprint mill in Khulna.Others not so.
It was actually the Star jute mill Rupsha Khulna that 37 Pakistani government officials were butchered and thrown into Rupsha river.
My uncle was Zonal GM there,at that time.the workers ratio for bangalis vs biharis were 2/4.5
Anyway some of this thing are really unforgettable for people who actually witnessed it.if you are interested I will tell my uncle to call you when next time he is in Karachi or Lahore. He has a partnership with one of your known mill there.
PS.indian army actively joined Freedom fighters and independent army of Bangladesh after the monsoon. That is end of October.
They provided training and arms in/from April.Till then we were on our own.
So I think in this context we known better than Pakistan and india ,what fighting for freedom means.

2- and 3- the agitation started since 1970 elections. it grew intense since start of 1971. non-cooperation movements (hartals) essentially stalled all government functions. and these hartals were far far from being non-violent or "Gandhian" in any way. several universities became hotbeds of leftist activity and groups had disposal of Indian armaments. separatist flags were raised by a certain group called 'nucleus'. non-Bengali communities were attacked and kidnappings started. it was Indian training, grooming and logistics all through involving these groups. with hindsight Op Searchlight was an ill advised move in the way it was carried out, but it did not start for no reason.

the activity of a few Indian trained far-leftists did not in any way represent the will of the majority of East Pakistanis (Bengali/non-Bengali) and it is NOT the history of current Bangladeshis either. our will was represented in the 1970 elections and the majority voted Sheikh Mujib to be prime minster of United Pakistan (not just of 1/5 of the land that came under invasion and control of India). although we found out what Sheikh Mujib really was when it was too late.

4- and 5- ask the agitating Bengali politicians why they needed to target a historical language of Bengal and prevent a whole community of people from getting educated right from the 1950s. or ask your history why Bengali Muslims were so backward at the 1947 point, something that has not completely changed even now i would say relative to the rest of the subcontinent. we as a society had really lost it if we thought such killings were justified because there was a numerical ethnic representation issue. maybe the anti-non-Bengali and class warfare propaganda by the League and the Union had succeeded in its aims.

In 1971, the killing, rape, & looting were done jointly by both Pakistani army and East Pakistani Razakar now known as Jamat-e-Islami Bangladesh

everyone knows the biggest looting was done by the invading Indian army. it was Indian armed forces that indulged in the ravaging of a sovereign land mass.

JeI is a political party since 1935

Some Bangladeshis here are trying to project themselves as a nation of tolerant, truly secular, minority loving people, the real picture is far from that.

the biggest source of intolerance is Bengali ethno-linguistic extremism. that should be clear from this thread at least

 

[the just]

2- and 3- the agitation started since 1970 elections. it grew intense since start of 1971. non-cooperation movements (hartals) essentially stalled all government functions. and these hartals were far far from being non-violent or "Gandhian" in any way. several universities became hotbeds of leftist activity and groups had disposal of Indian armaments. separatist flags were raised by a certain group called 'nucleus'. non-Bengali communities were attacked and kidnappings started. it was Indian training, grooming and logistics all through involving these groups. with hindsight Op Searchlight was an ill advised move in the way it was carried out, but it did not start for no reason.

the activity of a few Indian trained far-leftists did not in any way represent the will of the majority of East Pakistanis (Bengali/non-Bengali) and it is NOT the history of current Bangladeshis either. our will was represented in the 1970 elections and the majority voted Sheikh Mujib to be prime minster of United Pakistan (not just of 1/5 of the land that came under invasion and control of India). although we found out what Sheikh Mujib really was when it was too late.

4- and 5- ask the agitating Bengali politicians why they needed to target a historical language of Bengal and prevent a whole community of people from getting educated right from the 1950s. or ask your history why Bengali Muslims were so backward at the 1947 point, something that has not completely changed even now i would say relative to the rest of the subcontinent. we as a society had really lost it if we thought such killings were justified because there was a representation issue. maybe the anti-non-Bengali and class warfare propaganda by the League and the Union had succeeded in its aims.

For your last paragraph.....
What historical language? And why its even mentioned in 71 scenario? No body stopped anybody from learning Urdu.it was people's choice. Because from 47 to 71 government had plenty of opportunity to start Urdu as state language, mind it its vastly different from national language.All the private and military owned schools were English medium. Urdu was not compulsory subject.
There were state run schools in both language, but separately. In Pakistan bangla was not subject in urdu schools. There were no urdu subject in bangla mediums in this side either.
It was a misplaced system run by military service personnel who's own education was limited to equivalent of SSC and zero knowledge about bangla as another historical language.
Anti non Bengali? It was anti Brits till 47. So no,don't judge by handful of AL to us.
We may chose not to run for better life(?) abroad, but that doesn't prove,we don't read,think or understand who is trying to fool us with false propaganda.

 

[kalu_miah]

For your last paragraph.....
What historical language? And why its even mentioned in 71 scenario? No body stopped anybody from learning Urdu.it was people's choice. Because from 47 to 71 government had plenty of opportunity to start Urdu as state language, mind it its vastly different from national language.All the private and military owned schools were English medium. Urdu was not compulsory subject.
There were state run schools in both language, but separately. In Pakistan bangla was not subject in urdu schools. There were no urdu subject in bangla mediums in this side either.
It was a misplaced system run by military service personnel who's own education was limited to equivalent of SSC and zero knowledge about bangla as another historical language.
Anti non Bengali? It was anti Brits till 47. So no,don't judge by handful of AL to us.
We may chose not to run for better life(?) abroad, but that doesn't prove,we don't read,think or understand who is trying to fool us with false propaganda.

Did we achieve "independence" in 1971? If not, what did we achieve?
And what did we achieve in 1947 then if we had to achieve it again in 1971?

What if some day, Hindu's of Bangladesh want to achieve independence for their 15 million oppressed population curving out Khulna? What if Chittagonians want to make Chittagong independent? Who is to stop Sylheti's if they want an independent state of their own?

And please do not mention hopes, dreams and wishful thinking in your reply, I would like to see concrete facts on the ground, as they are today.

 

[khair_ctg]

For your last paragraph.....
What historical language? And why its even mentioned in 71 scenario? No body stopped anybody from learning Urdu.it was people's choice. Because from 47 to 71 government had plenty of opportunity to start Urdu as state language, mind it its vastly different from national language.All the private and military owned schools were English medium. Urdu was not compulsory subject.
There were state run schools in both language, but separately. In Pakistan bangla was not subject in urdu schools. There were no urdu subject in bangla mediums in this side either.
It was a misplaced system run by military service personnel who's own education was limited to equivalent of SSC and zero knowledge about bangla as another historical language.
Anti non Bengali? It was anti Brits till 47. So no,don't judge by handful of AL to us.
We may chose not to run for better life(?) abroad, but that doesn't prove,we don't read,think or understand who is trying to fool us with false propaganda.

the politicians and the leftist bindi wearing "intelligentsia" definitely targeted Urdu and promoted the Calcutta babu culture as they still do. you are right that Urdu ceased to be compulsory in Bengali medium school which was baffling. this was no anti-West Pakistan, it was anti-Bengali Muslim traditions. that is one important factor that resulted in the rift between the Bengalis and non-Bengalis. let's imagine the biggest ethnic group of now-Pakistan, the Punjabis doing the same thing, and what it's impact would be like. it was a forgone conclusion that Bengali Muslims would be isolated by the ethnocentric policies of Bengali politicians at the institutions that needed cohesion between different provincial groups. as if it was too much to ask for. all subcontinental Muslims did work together until 1947 and Urdu was *the* lingua franca

 

[the just]

To Mia bhai and Khair ctg....
We did not achieved anything in 47. We jumped from frying pan to the oven.in 71 we might have achieved something if our predecessor were little more patriotic .Last year in one of my post to you I mentioned a long bloody civil war or complete marge with india as our ultimate destiny.
What we need is our educated mass to remain in the country to direct the uneducated ones to lead in the right direction. Its all about ratinly 20 years back it was a different society, now we are outnumbered by 2 to 25. Its not about language, religion or any group's anymore. Its survival of the fittest.
For few years of power and few millions here and there.educated politicians in last 25 years has crippled our educational system. And don't think they did that by them self.clueless uneducated mass is the best neighbor in this subcontinent.
And about dividing Bangladesh in to small pieces may be indian ultimate dream,but the problem again is mass/ratio.9% Hindus going against 85% Muslims for separate country is not feasible, india knows it,Hindus knows it.Hindu loving chut ..ti..aas in power knows it.
There's no hope in near future, so its futile to even think about it.