What's new

BGB protests India's Anandabazar report on 'Bangladeshis stepping on unprotected land'

Black_cats

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
-5
BGB protests India's Anandabazar report on 'Bangladeshis stepping on unprotected land'

Arifur Rahman Rabbi
  • Published at 09:09 pm July 10th, 2020
lalmonirhat-bsf-2-1547902431599.jpg

Dhaka Tribune

It is almost impossible to cultivate on unprotected land in this area as it is patrolled by BGB day and night, the statement added

Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) on Friday issued a statement protesting a news report titled “Bangladeshis stepping on unprotected land” by Indian media outlet Anandabazar.

The report by Anandabazar is baseless, fabricated and serves ulterior motives, the BGB said.

The report claims Bangladeshis are cultivating freely in around 22,000 acres of unprotected land across Jalangi in Raninagar 1 and 2 blocks of India’s West Bengal state.

It also claims two Bangladeshis crossed into Indian territory and were detained by the Indian Border Security Force (BSF), and Bangladeshi miscreants picked up two villagers from the Raninagar border village in retaliation and for ransom.

However, there are no Bangladeshis cultivating in the aforementioned area and the detention incident has been completely misconstrued, BGB said.

The area in question extends from Charghat BOP to Talaimari BOP and crosses the zero line along the river Padma, which is under the responsibility of Rajshahi BGB. There are vast chars on both sides, the BGB statement said.

It is almost impossible to cultivate on unprotected land in this area as it is patrolled by BGB day and night, the statement added.

Regarding the detention incident, the BGB statement said two incidents took place at the Jalangi border on July 2, both of which were misrepresented in the report.

According to BGB, two Jalangi Indian drug smugglers - Nayan Sheikh and Shahidul Sheikh – crossed the border illegally and attacked locals in the village of Yusufpur in Bangladesh around 11:30am on the day of the incident. When they got surrounded by locals, members of Yusufpur BGB camp took the Indians into custody out of concern for their safety.

On the other hand, at 12pm the same day, a BSF patrol team illegally crossed the border and entered 300 meters inside Bangladesh (along Pillar 72/4-S) and captured three innocent farmers from the Yusufpur area. The farmers were returning home after cultivating on the char area on the Bangladesh side.

A BGB-BSF flag meeting was held following both incidents and the matter was settled amicably through the peaceful transfer of citizens of both the countries on July 3, the BGB statement said.

The statement also said a vested group may have published the false report to cover up the failures of the local BSF battalion.

The BSF has a hostile relationship with people in Muslim-dominated areas of the border. Some of the border residents are frustrated by their inability to smuggle cattle in recent times, and some members of BSF extort local fishermen, the BGB statement added.

https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangla...tests-report-published-by-indian-media-outlet
 
Last edited:
. . .
Sonagachi potrika as usual was firing from the hip to create sensation & hubris.

The matter of demarcation in that area is not as simple as Sonagachi potrika would like anyone to believe.

During partition the mid line of Ganga river was marked as the demarcation line for Rajshahi area. But problem is few years ago there was severe river erosion in that area & large swath of Bangladesh land was lost & river channel diverted clearly inside Bangladesh border.

The erosion was so bad it almost washed away few border out post of BGB in Rajshahi sector.(Usually built a mile or two inside from the border.) They had to take aggressive measure for river training.

Now that new land has risen on the previous border line (nearer to Indian villages) this situation has taken a turn to complex. A situation way over the pay grade of mere BSF camp commander.

A demarcation of the area has to be agreed upon between Dhaka & Delhi to solve this. So Sonagachi potrika should stop spewing crap & let professionals handle it.
 
Last edited:
.
Bangladesh should invest in Army , BGB , Navy and Air force . This is just a start . Bangladesh location (siliguri corridor ) , Indo Pacific , its economic power , Independent foreign policy , relations with China V West , NRC , CAA and Rohangia Refugees like issues will cause it trouble in future . Bangladesh may still have 5-7 years to invest in Armed and Border forces for adressing future problems .
 
.
That is a very provocative statement by BGB. Me likes.

I am liking that BGB standing up to BSF bullying more often now. Not just through words in media but also action on the border.
Clearly the direction from the top has been to change stance. Good to see them finally wake up from their hibernation.
 
.
Sonagachi potrika was usually firing from hips to create sensation & hubris.

The matter of demarcation in that area is not as simple as Sonagachi potrika would like anyone to believe.

During partition the mid line of Ganga river was marked as the demarcation line for Rajshahi area. But problem is few years ago there was severe river erosion in that area & large swath of Bangladesh land was lost & river channel diverted clearly inside Bangladesh border.

The erosion was so bad it almost washed away few border out post of BGB in Rajshahi sector.(Usually built a mile or two inside from the border.) They had to take aggressive measure for river training.

Now that new land has risen on the previous border line (nearer to Indian villages) this situation has taken a turn to complex. A situation way over the pay grade of mere BSF camp commander.

A demarcation of the area has to be agreed upon between Dhaka & Delhi to solve this. So Sonagachi potrika should stop spewing crap & let professionals handle it.

I cannot believe what a sensationalist trash rag Anandabazar has become.:disagree:

I guess desperate times call for desperate measures....shock headlines and outright lies just to sell a few editions to a gullible populace....
 
.
Bangladesh should invest in Army , BGB , Navy and Air force . This is just a start . Bangladesh location (siliguri corridor ) , Indo Pacific , its economic power , Independent foreign policy , relations with China V West , NRC , CAA and Rohangia Refugees like issues will cause it trouble in future . Bangladesh may still have 5-7 years to invest in Armed and Border forces for adressing future problems .
It will be difficult for BD alone to protect itself in an all-out war with India. But, this kind of local conflicts can be solved with the present BGB strength. The issue here is the political will of the GoB in Dhaka.

BSF is nothing in front of BGB. I repeat, BSF is like trash in front of BGB. Weapons do not fight, men behind the weapons fight. BGB will fight till the last man, it has been shown many times already.
 
.
During partition the mid line of Ganga river was marked as the demarcation line for Rajshahi area. But problem is few years ago there was severe river erosion in that area & large swath of Bangladesh land was lost & river channel diverted clearly inside Bangladesh border.

The erosion was so bad it almost washed away few border out post of BGB in Rajshahi sector.(Usually built a mile or two inside from the border.) They had to take aggressive measure for river training.

Now that new land has risen on the previous border line (nearer to Indian villages) this situation has taken a turn to complex. A situation way over the pay grade of mere BSF camp commander.

A demarcation of the area has to be agreed upon between Dhaka & Delhi to solve this. So Sonagachi potrika should stop spewing crap & let professionals handle it.
As far as I know about the border demarcation, boundary running through midstream river are demarcated by reference boundary pillar. Both country that share border river, erect refernce pillar on the bank of river in their own respective sides. Sites are chosen in such a position where if an imaginary straight line is drawn connecting the pillars of the both sides, it's mid point indicate the midstream of river thus the fixed boundary between the two countries. In such cases, no matter how many times river change the course, the boundary remain fixed. Our entire river boundary with India and Myanmar is a fixed boundary.

After the 1947 partition, a serious boundary dispute arose between India and Pakistan regarding Padma river boundary between Rajshahi and India's Murshidabad. Problem arose due to changing course of the Padma river and numerous Char Islands which both country claimed as their own due to ambiguous nature of boundary in that sector. So both country approached to UN to settle the dispute. UN appointed Swedish judge Algot Bagge to solve that problem. In 1950, Algot Bagge gave the verdict which settled the boundary in Padma river between Rajshahi and Murshidabad. Initially the boundary was based on Radcliffe Award's mid stream river formula, but in the last 70 years, the Padma river's course changed so many times that, now most of the boundary there do not follow mid stream of the river. If you look at the google map, then you can see, how much the boundary now diverge from the river. In some instances, river is entirely within Bangladesh, in some other places the opposite is true. This is due to the fixed nature of boundary which do not shift with the changing course of river.
upload_2020-7-12_12-32-8.png
 
Last edited:
.
As far as I know about the border demarcation, boundary running through midstream river are demarcated by reference boundary pillar. Both country that share border river, erect refernce pillar on the bank of river in their own respective sides. Sites are chosen in such a position where if an imaginary straight line is drawn connecting the pillars of the both sides, it's mid point indicate the midstream of river thus the fixed boundary between the two countries. In such cases, no matter how many times river change the course, the boundary remain fixed. Our entire river boundary with India and Myanmar is a fixed boundary.

After the 1947 partition, a serious boundary dispute arose between India and Pakistan regarding Padma river boundary between Rajshahi and India's Murshidabad. Problem arose due to changing course of the Padma river and numerous Char Islands which both country claimed as their own due to ambiguous nature of boundary in that sector. So both country approached to UN to settle the dispute. UN appointed Swedish judge Algot Bagge to solve that problem. In 1950, Algot Bagge gave the verdict which settled the boundary in Padma river between Rajshahi and Murshidabad. Initially the boundary was based on Radcliffe Award's mid stream river formula, but in the last 70 years, the Padma river's course changed so many times that, now most of the boundary there do not follow mid stream of the river. If you look at the google map, then you can see, how much the boundary now diverge from the river. In some instances, river is entirely within Bangladesh, in some other places the opposite is true. This is due to the fixed nature of boundary which do not shift with the changing course of river.
View attachment 650335
AFAIK whenever such an event takes place, a survey still needs to be conducted & new patrol routes, ROE needs to be agreed upon by authority of both country. A border is just a line on the map until someone points out the reference points on the ground to a soldier.

It's clear from the news articles that BSF do not want to patrol these area (I don't know why :P ) until a survey is conducted & new ROE is agreed upon.
 
.
It will be difficult for BD alone to protect itself in an all-out war with India. But, this kind of local conflicts can be solved with the present BGB strength. The issue here is the political will of the GoB in Dhaka.

BSF is nothing in front of BGB. I repeat, BSF is like trash in front of BGB. Weapons do not fight, men behind the weapons fight. BGB will fight till the last man, it has been shown many times already.

You have touched the real point though.

The political will in BD

The india of today does not have the capacity to hold a country like BD through occupation nor do they have the will to open a third front at the Indo BD border . but can BD take advantage of the situation ?
 
.
Oops. Looks like Hasina and her chumps are losing control over the military, why would the BGB release such provocative statements now when this same organization would do nothing to combat Indian/Burmese aggression
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom