What's new

Bear's eye-view of British warplane: Russian TV releases footage of the moment UK jet intercepted Pu

Mugwop

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
6,730
Reaction score
2
Country
Haiti
Location
Pakistan
RAF fighter jets scramble to intercept two Russian bombers capable of carrying nuclear missiles off Cornwall
Tupolev Tu95 Bear aircraft streaked along fringes of UK airspace, prompting the deployment of two Typhoons
Russian TV later screens footage of mid-air contact thought to have been filmed on previous interception
Country 'could not cope' if Russia attacked because our defences have been 'decimated', say military chiefs
David Cameron defiantly dismissed the incident, saying the Russians 'are trying to make some sort of a point'
But former air chiefs say number of British fighter squadrons has fallen from 26 at Cold War end to just seven
Footage screened on Russian TV shows the moment one of Vladimir Putin's 'Bear Bombers' is intercepted by British Typhoon jets over the English Channel.
The video was filmed from the window of one of the huge Cold War-era Tu-95 planes which Russian military chiefs are sending to 'buzz' British airspace.
It was released to Kremlin-backed TV channels in Moscow and is believed to have been shot during a stand-off in the skies off the coast of Bournemouth last month.
Two Russian bombers made similar manoeuvres this week, skirting British airspace off the coast of Cornwall, where they were intercepted and escorted by the two RAF Typhoon fighters.
The footage from TV Zvedza, which is owned by the Russian defence ministry, shows armed RAF and Nato jets flying in close formation with the plane and provides clear views of the bomber's turboprop engines.
One RAF Typhoon flies so close that the pilot can clearly be seen through the cockpit glass.
25D471FE00000578-2960793-Up_in_the_air_Footage_of_British_and_French_fighter_jets_escorti-a-17_1424422725884.jpg

25D46FAB00000578-2960793-The_footage_is_believed_to_be_from_one_of_the_previous_occasions-a-18_1424422747054.jpg

The footage emerged as former military top brass warned Britain cannot defend itself against the military threat posed by Russia.
Military chiefs said the UK ‘could not cope’ if Russia attacked because our defences had been ‘decimated’.
RAF fighter jets this week scrambled to intercept two Russian bombers capable of carrying nuclear missiles as they flew menacingly off the coast of Cornwall.
In a sign of the growing provocation from Russian president Vladimir Putin, the Tupolev Tu95 Bear aircraft streaked along the fringes of UK airspace, prompting the deployment of two state-of-the-art Typhoons.
David Cameron defiantly dismissed the incident, saying the Russians ‘are trying to make some sort of a point, and I don’t think we should dignify it with too much of a response’.
He added: ‘I think what this episode demonstrates is that we do have the fast jets, the pilots, the systems in place to protect the UK.’
But former air chiefs rubbished the Prime Minister’s claims, saying the number of British fighter squadrons had plunged from 26 at the end of the Cold War to just seven following heavy RAF cuts by successive governments.
Sir Michael Graydon, former head of the RAF, said: ‘I very much doubt whether the UK could sustain a shooting war against Russia. We are at half the capabilities we had previously.’
Russian military planes, ships and submarines have made at least 17 incursions close to the UK since the start of last year as the increasingly truculent regime in Moscow tests Western response times.
25D8BA4C00000578-0-image-a-31_1424385767087.jpg

Sir Michael added: ‘They fly in these regions to check our air defences and have probably worked out we are not as sharp as we were.
‘They know it is provocative and they are doing it at a time when defence in the west is pretty wet compared to where they are.’
Since 2010, the Coalition has axed 30,000 soldiers, sailors and airmen as well as hundreds of warships, fighter jets, spy planes and tanks in a bid to cut the Ministry of Defence’s budget by £4.7 billion and plug a £40 billion hole in equipment spending.
Air Commodore Andrew Lambert, who commanded Allied forces in northern Iraq in 1999, said: ‘If the Russians turned up the heat, we would struggle badly.
‘If Putin wanted to attack, he would not send a pair of bombers, he would send the lot and saturate our defences; we couldn’t cope.
‘The Typhoon is a really good aircraft but with their relatively small numbers they would be overwhelmed: the Russians would outflank us, go around us or just go through us.’
He added: ‘The modern generation of politicians has grown up in absolute security – they’ve never felt a threat to their existence, safety or security.
‘They’ve taken peace for granted and decimated the Armed Forces. Let’s hope we don’t pay the price.’
The latest incident came as Defence Secretary Michael Fallon warned that Putin posed a ‘real and present danger’ to three former Soviet satellites in the Baltics – Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.
Vladimir Komoyedov, chairman of the Russian parliament’s defence committee, accused Mr Fallon, 62, of ‘stupidity’.
He added: ‘I feel that he is a bit too old, not only in terms of his age but also in his ideas.’
The two Typhoons, armed with air-to-air missiles, were launched from RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire on Wednesday after the Russian bombers were spotted at 6.30pm.
They were escorted as they flew south, then turned around and flew north past the Irish coast.
Elizabeth Quintana, of defence think-tank the Royal United Services Institute, said: ‘We have to find a way to stop the Russians because there is a chance things could get very nasty very quickly.’
Britain at the mercy of Vladimir Putin's planes | Daily Mail Online
 
. .
This should be a wake up call to them and to Europe in general that they shouldn't let their guards down and find themselves in a situation like in 1939.
 
. . . .
Sorties carried out by the Russian bombers, was essentially an intelligence gathering act rather than an aggressive act. Quite often the pilots of the aircraft would wave or communicate with each other during such intercepts.
At the moment, I think its important for the Russians to be aware of the activities going on in British ports, bases, cities and coastline.
@Barmaley @vostok

Btw we have a thread running on Russian intercepts here
When a Russian fighter jet intercepts you!!!
I loved the videos and articles posted by @Penguin and @Barmaley.
 
.
EU has powerfull military also they have USA to protect them so whats the point to worry about?
 
. . . .
I don't think there is any double standard. The article is more along the lines of "hey we don't have as many planes as we used to have to do intercepts" vs "hey what are they doing flying off our coasts"
 
.
These are the same people who criticized US for our recon flights in international waters ?
 
.
L O L Double standards.:crazy_pilot:
OH really. So what are you comparing to? Which standard versus what behaviours?

The aircrafts did not violate the borders of Britain - so what's the problem?
Not filing or not following a flightplan, turning of your transponder e.g., which endangers civilian aviation. Esp. in a post 9/11 environment.

A FCO spokeswoman said: “While the Russian planes did not enter sovereign UK airspace and were escorted by RAF Typhoons throughout the time they were in the UK area of interest, the Russian planes caused disruption to civil aviation. That is why we summoned the Russian ambassador to account for the incident.”

It is unusual but not unknown for such flights to come along the south coast, over the channel, but a British official said: “This time they caused more disruption and concern than before when we have had to send Typhoons up to take a look. So that’s why we called the ambassador in.” The Russian ambassador, Alexander Yakovenko, came to the FCO at 4pm.

Flights by Russian planes close to British and other Nato members’ air space have become more frequent as tensions have increased between Moscow and the west, particularly over the war in Ukraine. Last month, the Swedish government complained that a Russian military aircraft had been flying near its airspace with its transponders turned off to avoid being spotted by civilian radar, and nearly collided with a passenger jet.

British officials said they could not confirm whether transponders were turned off on the planes flying close to the English coast on Wednesday. “Disrupting civil aviation is one thing. Having a strategic bomber close to your airspace is another,” a Nato official said. “If they have their transponders turned on, then civilian aviation can see where they are and what they are. If they are off, that’s when we have to get up there to find out.”

“We have had to fly four times more intercepts in 2014 than in 2013. That’s 400 times. Either they don’t follow a flight plan or they file it and we get up there and it’s a different kind of aircraft flying. It doesn’t help when they turn off the transponders. All Nato planes on all missions have their transponders turned on.”

Observers said a possible explanation of the timing ofWednesday’s flypast was the start this week of a public inquiry in London into the 2006 killing of a former Russian intelligence officer, Alexander Litvinenko, by radioactive poisoning.

“This may be timed with the Litvinenko court case as a signal of displeasure,” Ian Kearns, the director of the European Leadership Network, and an associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, said. “But it fits with a wider posture of a more assertive Russian demonstration of a growing capability to defend and assert its interests as it sees fit.”
Russian ambassador summoned to explain bombers over the Channel | World news | The Guardian

For another example , read NATO Tracks Large-Scale Russian Air Activity in Europe
At approximately 3:00 a.m. CET on 29 October, NATO radars detected and tracked eight Russian aircraft flying in formation over the North Sea. F-16 aircraft from the Royal Norwegian Air Force were scrambled, intercepted and identified the Russian aircraft, which included four Tu-95 Bear H strategic bombers and four Il-78 tanker aircraft. The formation flew from mainland Russia over the Norwegian Sea in international airspace.

The bomber and tanker aircraft from Russia did not file flight plans or maintain radio contact with civilian air traffic control authorities and they were not using on-board transponders. This poses a potential risk to civil aviation as civilian air traffic control cannot detect these aircraft or ensure there is no interference with civilian air traffic.

These are the same people who criticized US for our recon flights in international waters ?
O f course.
 
.
It show hypocracy of west, because if they fly their spy planes close to China or some other countries border then its ok but others can't do that with them.

In OP pics show how dangerously close EFT was flying with bear but when PLAAF did that with US spy planes they are armatures and hostile.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom