AgNoStiC MuSliM
ADVISORS
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 25,259
- Reaction score
- 87
- Country
- Location
Push-backBut they already have demonstrated the ability to set the social agenda. So what does your comment imply for the general population?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Push-backBut they already have demonstrated the ability to set the social agenda. So what does your comment imply for the general population?
How easily a narrow minded retard has taken a human life. And people are left discussing should mixed gatherings be allowed. This is how much we value a human life.
Ban on mixed gathering would always come from people who are weak in controlling themselves, who just look at women as some sex toys and nothing more. Really insecure sexually frustrated people ..... potential sexual harassers.
Lack of sporting venues and healthy activities will keep promoting this activity. Young minds not only need academic education, they also need at least 3 hours of daily tiring physical activity. A strong confident mind and body won't that easily fall prey to sexual fantasies.
I hope the justice gets served.
Push-back
It's necessary.More internal strife. Not good.
It's necessary.
Without voices on the opposing side, how will regressive Mullah barbarism be opposed and pressure applied to change the social agenda in the long term?
But those who oppose the barbaric Mullah mindset must still try - to not at least try would guarantee failure.Predicting a winner, for better or worse, is not an easy thing at this point in time.
But those who oppose the barbaric Mullah mindset must still try - to not at least try would guarantee failure.
Why an American citizen is so concerned about the social issues of PakistanThis tussle has its roots in the decades past and will likely come to a head in the next few years. Predicting a winner, for better or worse, is not an easy thing at this point in time.
Bro, the differences between sects are non differences. The scholars of the ahle sunnah consider any of the 4 sunni madhabs completely correct, as well as the jafari Shia sect. There are some differences between us and the Shia, us and the wahhabis, but they are 1% not 99%. Deobandi and barelvi are both under the fold of ahle sunnah, there are only individuals who have either held and propagated contentious beliefs or are seen to have held or propagated contentious beliefs. Islam has scope for plurality - it has never been my way or the highway.
The path of people like the man who murdered the professor, Lal Masjid Mullahs and Rizvi of the TLP will turn Pakistan into the likes of Somalia and Afghanistan. The path to prosperity lies in tolerance, respect for others beliefs and values and freedom and creativity, like the Western nations, Turkey and Malaysia. Not this bearded, Mullah barbarism that supports child marriages, punishment for 'fashionable beards', music, TV and a segregation of the sexes.
I understand your concerns bro I agree with some of it but the problem is the that just like in the ((Kosher)) infected West they want conflicts between the traditional class and modern/liberal class what happen to when we did not give a shit what people did but they were our Pakistani brothers we need to go back to those times
Interesting to note that Deobandis and Ithna Ashari Shias have the same political ideas for an Islamic state. Maulana Maududi had a tremendous influence on many personalities including Imam Khomeini and Sayyid Qutb.
Our current PM is a Deobandi.
False equivalence. Pakistan is a religious society by the wishes of our people and our constitution.
TLP and Lal Masjid type of criminals do not speak for all religious Muslims.
We are seeing the steady decline of morality and indecency in society. Unless we fight it by promoting positive values, we will see more incidents like in Kasur.
Our current PM is a Deobandi.
And did you see the comment of the poster I responded to, where he justified people taking the law into their own hands if the decisions or actions of the government did not fit their narrow minded interpretation of Islam?False equivalence. Pakistan is a religious society by the wishes of our people and our constitution.
TLP and Lal Masjid type of criminals do not speak for all religious Muslims.
Sacasm? Or whatمارکیٹ میں نیا ممتاز قاتلی آیا ہے ۔۔۔
People taking the law into their own hands are criminals and terrorists and must be dealt with as such. No one has the same interpretation of 'Islam'. I see absolutely nothing wrong with a welcome party for both men and women. It is people with a depraved mindset, who are unable to control themselves, that have problems with these things.
Millions of people did not sacrifice blood and treasure for Pakistan so that Pakistan could be turned into an intolerant, backward and regressive country based on the distorted and hate-filled interpretations of Islam by certain Mullah's.
If that tolerance ,respect for others beliefs and values and freedom and creativity etc involves just looking the other way and ignoring it while those 'others' are promoting or encouraging behavior that is openly against the principles of the society, like fornication/adultery, promiscuity, homosexuality etc then i am sorry, that is just not going to work here, because the 'others' are offending the society by attempting ideological,moral subversion of the society. This is an Islamic country, not a secular western state, neither does it aspire to be. That's just the way it is no matter how much that may irk these aspiring westerners.The path of people like the man who murdered the professor, Lal Masjid Mullahs and Rizvi of the TLP will turn Pakistan into the likes of Somalia and Afghanistan. The path to prosperity lies in tolerance, respect for others beliefs and values and freedom and creativity, like the Western nations, Turkey and Malaysia. Not this bearded, Mullah barbarism that supports child marriages, punishment for 'fashionable beards', music, TV and a segregation of the sexes.
And did you see the comment of the poster I responded to, where he justified people taking the law into their own hands if the decisions or actions of the government did not fit their narrow minded interpretation of Islam?
Didn't know that. I assumed with all the peeri/mureedi he was a barelvi.