What's new

BAE Systems sees more Typhoon orders, reiterates outlook

Blue Marlin

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
Messages
6,688
Reaction score
6
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
BAE Systems sees more Typhoon orders, reiterates outlook

r

A sign adorns a hangar at the BAE Systems facility at Salmesbury, near Preston, northern England March
British defence group BAE Systems said it expected more orders for its Typhoon fighter jets following talks with current and prospective customers, as it reiterated its forecast for full-year earnings.

The group said it was trading in line with its expectations, and it still expected to deliver a 5-10 percent rise in underlying earnings per share this year.

"Discussions with current and prospective operators of Typhoon aircraft continue to support group's expectations for additional contract awards," it said on Thursday.

It also said talks between itself, the British government and Saudi Arabian government were progressing to define the scope and terms of the next five-year defence co-operation programme between the countries, a significant driver of profit for the group.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-bae-systems-outlook-idUKKCN1260DY
313270h.jpg

basically the saudis are in talks for some more typhoons
@mike2000 is back @waz and the other brits........

for the love of god and all thats holy leave pakistan out of this.
 
BAE Systems sees more Typhoon orders, reiterates outlook

r

A sign adorns a hangar at the BAE Systems facility at Salmesbury, near Preston, northern England March
British defence group BAE Systems said it expected more orders for its Typhoon fighter jets following talks with current and prospective customers, as it reiterated its forecast for full-year earnings.

The group said it was trading in line with its expectations, and it still expected to deliver a 5-10 percent rise in underlying earnings per share this year.

"Discussions with current and prospective operators of Typhoon aircraft continue to support group's expectations for additional contract awards," it said on Thursday.

It also said talks between itself, the British government and Saudi Arabian government were progressing to define the scope and terms of the next five-year defence co-operation programme between the countries, a significant driver of profit for the group.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-bae-systems-outlook-idUKKCN1260DY
313270h.jpg

basically the saudis are in talks for some more typhoons
@mike2000 is back @waz and the other brits........

for the love of god and all thats holy leave pakistan out of this.

Huh....why will Pakistan even feature in this topic? Lol. never crossed my mind as to why. :whistle::buba_phone::blink:


Anyway, BAE has doing huge business around the word(only Lockheed Martin is bigger), they have their tentacles in basically all corners of the globe. Granted they are a true british success story and their military products/equipment/electronic and software technology is word class and matched by only a select few. However , seems to me that they have grown too big an dominant. It's like a state in itself :taz:



BAE Systems has drummed up hopes that it will land further foreign orders for its typhoon FighterJets.
Typhoon_bombed_up_The_Daily_Telegraph__RAF_Akrotiri_in_Cyprus__A_Typhoon_jet_prepares_for_tak-medium_trans++piVx42joSuAkZ0bE9ijUnGH28ZiNHzwg9svuZLxrn1U.jpg


GHL-133319.jpg

A RAF Typhoon fighter, which is produced by BAE Systems CREDIT: JULIAN SIMMONDS
Alan Tovey, industry editor

6 OCTOBER 2016 • 1:26PM

The FTSE 100 defence group used a trading update to say that its efforts to sell the jets will continue to be supported by the government” and that talks with “potential and existing operators of Typhoons continue to support the group’s expectations for additional contracts”.

However, it cautioned that there can be “no certainty as to the timing of the orders”.

Chart.aspx

The news did little to bolster the market’s view towards the company with the shares edging up only 0.2pc in mid-morning.

The Government has swung behind defence exports, with the 2015 Security and Defence Strategic Review backing a “so-called” prosperity agenda that recognises the importance of the forces supporting efforts to sell UK-made weapons abroad.

Lobbying from the industry for soldiers, sailors and pilots who actually use the systems to be involved in the selling process to potential buyers has been successful and is now part of this.

Further support could be in the future with the Government’s Committee on Arms Exports Controls in July launching an inquiry into the state’s role in backing Britain's £24bn a year arms industry, which exports about £8bn of weapons a year on average.

BAE also said it was working with Whitehall and Saudi Arabia to nail down the terms of a further five-year deal to support the Gulf nation’s military that is worth billions.

In the US the company said the outlook “remains positive” for defence spending.
Back home, on Wednesday BAE officially began work on the first of the Successor submarines replace the current Trident missile vessels, a potential £41bn deal which will run for decades.

The company also used the update to say work was “progressing” on the new Type 26 frigates for the Navy, though some defence sources have questioned how advanced this is, with expectations that construction work should have started by now.

There have been claims from some MPs – mainly in Soctland, where the ships will be built - that budgetary pressure at Ministry of Defence mean it is delaying the work. Originally 13 of these “global combat ships were planned” but the number has been cut to eight, but there is an option to build five cheaper, stripped down versions.
11335330_type26-medium_trans++NwJyN5aFH1f8m-UGCq32YHGTJFJS74MYhNY6w3GNbO8.jpg

The Type 26 'global combat ship' is hoped to find foreign buyers CREDIT: BAE/MOD

Type 26s are set to be part of the drive for foreign defence sales but some suggest work on designing them to be exportable and affordable for other countries is being affected by the delays, creating a headache for BAE moving the project ahead.

The company added that the contracts to build the fourth and fifth Offshore Patrol Vessels for the Navy is in the process of being finalised. These lightweight ships are also crucial to keeping BAE’s shipbuilding skills alive, rather than facing the prospect of laying off staff if work dries up and then beginning the expensive and time-consuming process of recreating skills which have been lost.

Still in the UK, BAE also noted it had signed a 10-year deal worth £2.1bn to support the RAF’s fleet of Typhoons.

In the update BAE reiterated it’s guidance for the fill year, predicting underlying earnings per share will rise by between 5pc and 10pc to 40.2p.

Analysts at Investec called the update “supportive” of their positive view of BAE, and upgraded the target price by 30p to 580p.

Sandy Morris, analyst at Jefferies, noted that the update highlighted BAE’s guidance assumed a sterling dollar exchange rate average of $1.45 to £1, improving earnings per share by 0.7p.

With the pound having hit 30-year lows recently, he added that BAE could almost hit the lower end of its guidance solely from positive foreign exchange. If BAE did not do better, it would indicate a lack of operational improvement in the business.

“The $1.45 figure might have made sense when BAE provided guidance back in February, but it’s not likely to be that,” Mr Morris said.

Independent defence analyst described the announcement as “a sound, straightforward and positive statement with no surprises”. He added that “export potential for the Typhoon remains excellent and it is also good to see that the May government is clearly now prioritising defence.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...al-for-typhoon-export-sales-as-it-holds-grow/

Why is the government/MOD delaying the building of our 8 type 26 frigates? This project should have started by now. :hitwall:
 
Last edited:
Huh....why will Pakistan even feature in this topic? Lol. never crossed my mind as to why. :whistle::buba_phone::blink:


Anyway, BAE has doing huge business around the word(only Lockheed Martin is bigger), they have their tentacles in basically all corners of the globe. Granted they are a true british success story and their military products/equipment/electronic and software technology is word class and matched by only a select few. However , seems to me that they have grown too big an dominant. It's like a state in itself :taz:



BAE Systems has drummed up hopes that it will land further foreign orders for is typhoon jet Fighters.
Typhoon_bombed_up_The_Daily_Telegraph__RAF_Akrotiri_in_Cyprus__A_Typhoon_jet_prepares_for_tak-medium_trans++piVx42joSuAkZ0bE9ijUnGH28ZiNHzwg9svuZLxrn1U.jpg


GHL-133319.jpg

An RAF Typhoon fighter, which is produced by BAE Systems CREDIT: JULIAN SIMMONDS
Alan Tovey, industry editor
6 OCTOBER 2016 • 1:26PM

The FTSE 100 defence group used a trading update to say that its efforts to sell the jets will continue to be supported by the government” and that talks with “potential and existing operators of Typhoons continue to support the group’s expectations for additional contracts”.

However, it cautioned that there can be “no certainty as to the timing of the orders”.

Chart.aspx
The news did little to bolster the market’s view towards the company with the shares edging up only 0.2pc in mid-morning.

The Government has swung behind defence exports, with the 2015 Security and Defence Strategic Review backing a “so-called” prosperity agenda that recognises the importance of the forces supporting efforts to sell UK-made weapons abroad.

Lobbying from the industry for soldiers, sailors and pilots who actually use the systems to be involved in the selling process to potential buyers has been successful and is now part of this.

Further support could be in the future with the Government’s Committee on Arms Exports Controls in July launching an inquiry into the state’s role in backing Britain's £24bn a year arms industry, which exports about £8bn of weapons a year on average.

BAE also said it was working with Whitehall and Saudi Arabia to nail down the terms of a further five-year deal to support the Gulf nation’s military that is worth billions.

In the US the company said the outlook “remains positive” for defence spending.
watch
Back home, on Wednesday BAE officially began work on the first of the Successor submarines replace the current Trident missile vessels, a potential £41bn deal which will run for decades.

The company also used the update to say work was “progressing” on the new Type 26 frigates for the Navy, though some defence sources have questioned how advanced this is, with expectations that construction work should have started by now.

There have been claims from some MPs – mainly in Soctland, where the ships will be built - that budgetary pressure at Ministry of Defence mean it is delaying the work. Originally 13 of these “global combat ships were planned” but the number has been cut to eight, but there is an option to build five cheaper, stripped down versions.
11335330_type26-medium_trans++NwJyN5aFH1f8m-UGCq32YHGTJFJS74MYhNY6w3GNbO8.jpg

The Type 26 'global combat ship' is hoped to find foreign buyers CREDIT: BAE/MOD
Type 26s are set to be part of the drive for foreign defence sales but some suggest work on designing them to be exportable and affordable for other countries is being affected by the delays, creating a headache for BAE moving the project ahead.

The company added that the contracts to build the fourth and fifth Offshore Patrol Vessels for the Navy is in the process of being finalised. These lightweight ships are also crucial to keeping BAE’s shipbuilding skills alive, rather than facing the prospect of laying off staff if work dries up and then beginning the expensive and time-consuming process of recreating skills which have been lost.

Still in the UK, BAE also noted it had signed a 10-year deal worth £2.1bn to support the RAF’s fleet of Typhoons.

In the update BAE reiterated it’s guidance for the fill year, predicting underlying earnings per share will rise by between 5pc and 10pc to 40.2p.

Analysts at Investec called the update “supportive” of their positive view of BAE, and upgraded the target price by 30p to 580p.

Sandy Morris, analyst at Jefferies, noted that the update highlighted BAE’s guidance assumed a sterling dollar exchange rate average of $1.45 to £1, improving earnings per share by 0.7p.

With the pound having hit 30-year lows recently, he added that BAE could almost hit the lower end of its guidance solely from positive foreign exchange. If BAE did not do better, it would indicate a lack of operational improvement in the business.

“The $1.45 figure might have made sense when BAE provided guidance back in February, but it’s not likely to be that,” Mr Morris said.

Independent defence analyst described the announcement as “a sound, straightforward and positive statement with no surprises”. He added that “export potential for the Typhoon remains excellent and it is also good to see that the May government is clearly now prioritising defence.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...al-for-typhoon-export-sales-as-it-holds-grow/

Why is the government/MOD delaying the building of our 8 type 26 frigates? This project should have started by now. :hitwall:
i mentioned them because it near enough guarantied they will bring it up.

indeed they are building the 4 ballistic missile sub but with FRENCH steel
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/trident-submarines-built-french-steel-8980420

bloody tories
they cocked up on the frigates and this.
also our new ajax tanks, guess what the steel is being sourced from sweden, of all the countries out there, there chose sweden.

as for bae systems and infact rolls royce they are both doing good. RR is gearing up for its new "partner" turkey with engines for their helicopters and their fighter jet programs. and bae for doing a huge amount. they got like $40 billion in sales from the usa alone and RR got $4 billion. and now the saudis. they cant complain.
 
i mentioned them because it near enough guarantied they will bring it up.

indeed they are building the 4 ballistic missile sub but with FRENCH steel
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/trident-submarines-built-french-steel-8980420

bloody tories
they cocked up on the frigates and this.
also our new ajax tanks, guess what the steel is being sourced from sweden, of all the countries out there, there chose sweden.

as for bae systems and infact rolls royce they are both doing good. RR is gearing up for its new "partner" turkey with engines for their helicopters and their fighter jet programs. and bae for doing a huge amount. they got like $40 billion in sales from the usa alone and RR got $4 billion. and now the saudis. they cant complain.

True, BAE also has a huge presence in our brotherly country Australia. They built Australia's 2 new LHD recently, and I believe they are the second largest defence contractor in. Australia. :)

As for the steel, I don't read much into that. It's not a strategic sector per se. many countries use steel from different sources in their programs. So I believe the MOD was merely looking for the most competitive deal based on price. Granted they could have given the contract to a local steel company but we live in a globalization world and we are a very liberal capitalistic country(the most in Europe I would say). Reason we also attract far more FDI stock investment than any other European country(and second only to the U.S globally). :)
 
Last edited:
True, BAE also has a huge presence in our brotherly country Australia. They built Australia's 2 new LHD recently, and I believe they are the second largest defence contractor in. Australia. :)

As for the steel, I don't read much into that. It's not a strategic sector per se.m any countries use steel from different sources in their programs. So I believe the MOD was merely looking for the most competitive deal based n price. Granted they could have given the contract to a local steel company but we live in a globalisation world and we are a very liberal capitalistic country(the most in Europe I would say). Reason we also attract far more FDI stock investment than any other European country(and second only to the U.S globally). :)
actually speaking of the aussies they are getting the horbart destroyers, obviously being built by our truly bae.
and the type 26 is a tender to replace their frigates.
 
i mentioned them because it near enough guarantied they will bring it up.

indeed they are building the 4 ballistic missile sub but with FRENCH steel
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/trident-submarines-built-french-steel-8980420

bloody tories
they cocked up on the frigates and this.
also our new ajax tanks, guess what the steel is being sourced from sweden, of all the countries out there, there chose sweden.

as for bae systems and infact rolls royce they are both doing good. RR is gearing up for its new "partner" turkey with engines for their helicopters and their fighter jet programs. and bae for doing a huge amount. they got like $40 billion in sales from the usa alone and RR got $4 billion. and now the saudis. they cant complain.

The iron mines in Svappavaara was the reason Churchill sent the British Army to Narvik, in the beginning of WW2.
They provide high quality ore, for world class steel, so it is not surprising at all.
Sandvik and BAHCO are good examples of companies based on special steels developed in Sweden.

image.jpeg
 
The iron mines in Svappavaara was the reason Churchill sent the British Army to Narvik, in the beginning of WW2.
They provide high quality ore, for world class steel, so it is not surprising at all.
Sandvik is a good example of a company based on special steels developed in Sweden.
indeed. but here in the uk tata steel is in deep doo doo and the point of the government going to Sweden instead of going to British foundries is like blasphemy. im not saying the swedish steel is crap but the point im making here is that they should have used british steel instead of swedish.
heck were using french steel to build our ballistic subs too. the tories have messed up.
 
indeed. but here in the uk tata steel is in deep doo doo and the point of the government going to Sweden instead of going to British foundries is like blasphemy. im not saying the swedish steel is crap but the point im making here is that they should have used british steel instead of swedish.
heck were using french steel to build our ballistic subs too. the tories have messed up.

If I were a British crewman of a tank, I would like the steel protecting me to be the best possible
regardless where it is manufactured, but you want to be more loyal to the British worker,
than to the British soldier I guess.
 
If I were a British crewman of a tank, I would like the steel protecting me to be the best possible
regardless where it is manufactured, but you want to be more loyal to the British worker,
than to the British soldier I guess.
well put it this way would we even think of using inferior material for millitary equipment? i feel price was the deciding factor here as well as a guarantee
 
well put it this way would we even think of using inferior material for millitary equipment? i feel price was the deciding factor here as well as a guarantee

- "There is something bloody wrong with our ships today"
Famous phrase by RN officer during the Battle of Jutland.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom