Well I am sure new MOD is seeking TOT that will actually help us & aren't these guns & Bofors of the same caliber
too costly to replace Boffors !!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well I am sure new MOD is seeking TOT that will actually help us & aren't these guns & Bofors of the same caliber
too costly to replace Boffors !!!
Ya but if they don't word out for MSC we can use it to replace Bofors
and what will we use for MSC then ?
we need ultra low weight artillery guns which can be towed underslung heavy lift helos ...for rapid mobilization .
since numbers are limited ..they are almost exclusively used in mountainous regions ...
Off course few will find place along Kargil , Ladakh sector ...
For bofors replacement we need cheaper alternative so that we can mass induct and that's why the emphasis for indigenous artillery gun.
Let me rephrase myself
These guns will surely be used for MSC but what t think that we should wait a few more years & let the Bharat Forge comeup & induct it in large nos
That was hardly going to happen overnight and doesn't mean that every single deal India has with the US will follow this route (CH-47F, AH-64E, S-70B, MQ-4C etc won't).
A small step in the right direction is a step in the right direction nonetheless and I don't think it is reasonable to expect everything at once from the outset.
@sancho @Abingdonboy . I've read your posts from time to time and I have a question for Sancho. Could you tell me, as I'm not much into the military side of things, how many NON- NATO partners have we made such offers to, as we've offered India?
I ask because we are very particular on who gets TOT, especially to what we feel is the best technology.
But with you the expectations seems to be either your way or highway.
What offer do you mean, howitzers in general and why limit it to non NATO partners? Howitzers in general are on offer from all sides Russia, Israel, Europe, partially Asia, Siingapore for example offered a light howitzer in competition to the M777 initially and they offered self-propelled howitzers in licence production deals under ToT as well.
What the US feels to be the best technology and what they are ready to share don't have to be the same what we have access to, just look at the MMRCA and the fact that you didn't offered critical ToT of AESA radars or avionics, while the whole world did, partially even of superior techs. So it's not about our way or highway, but about the options we have apart from what the US offers. The India market is not like selling stuff to Australia, Canada or even Israel, where you have control and influence. We are independent, can choose what actually is the best for us, not what the US decides is the best for us. F18s and F16s today with AIM 120D and JSOW are nice, especially since that offer is better that what you offer even your close ally Pakistan, but simply not good enough to Eurocanards with METEOR and Scalp / Storm Shadow, critical ToT or even partnerships. So make us better offers and we will be happy to buy more US stuff.
I was asking why do you expect us to give so much more than we give our NATO allies
The Indian market is not like selling stuff to Australia, Canada or even Israel, where you have control and influence. We are independent, can choose what actually is the best for us, not what the US decides is the best for us
They don't- they are making these offers based on an AESA they will have in future, fully knowing that it won't be as technologically advanced as a ours.
Exactly, it is a move to fix the offset problem and in that regard it's a wellcomed step, that they finally moved to fix this deal but nothing more, since minor offsets doesn't improve our industrial capability.
Can you elaborate on the M777 proposal?
Ian King: It is under Foreign Military Sales (FMS) route of the US government. It is a Government to Government arrangement and in terms of the final assembly, it will be done here. One can really kick-start the M777 because you've got a very mature plan. We know there's going to be an offset obligation, and we will commit to that obligation but we will go even further than that and have committed that we will do the final assembly of the howitzer in India. We will create a facility for final Assembly-Integration-Testing (AIT) with an Indian industrial partner. Previously we had a facility in the US. So we will basically take a replica and put it here in India. And then we will sign up an Indian partner to do it with us.
In case, things move forward on the M777, what will be the likely components that can be manufactured or moved to India?
Ian King: I think that will be subject to arrangements at that time. It’s quite a complex thing. Generally, with these programmes, you move bit by bit till you get the finals. The way we’ve done on Hawk. It will be better to start at the end with the assembly line first and then its easier to start manufacturing components.
I am hoping higher number of Arty guns will finally bring about a change in deployment doctrine of IA along the western border. It is quite dismal that heavy artillery has been not used to mitigate the transgressions of neighbor. If India does want to have lower threshold for tolerating pakistani transgression, it is imperative to have forward deployment of arty units. Procurement of more arty units will be the right direction that previous governments have deliberately undermined due to spineless foreign policy.
Let me quote myself here:
BAE Systems enthused about 'Make in India', upbeat on M777 guns - The Hindu
As expected, they only trying to move around the former offset problem, by setting up an assembly line, so the Indian industry only gets to know, how to assemble the parts produced in the UK and the US, so basically scewdriver work, rather than actually producing something.
In comparision, as part of the C130J or P8I deals, airframe parts of both aircrafts are now produced at TATA or HAL and that even for exports => Make in India!!!
Better to go for a limited number of these guns as a stop gap measure & wait till the Kalyani gun is ready
It's actually the other way around, we can add the Kalyani gun later, whtn it's fully developed and if it fulfills the operational requirements, but we can't make the defence of the country dependent on the hope of that gun. Until that is ready and capable we have to plan with the M777 and the faster we can get it, the better. China is pushing it's capabilities in the high altitude warfare hard and our pace is far too low to counter that. In some procurement cases, we have to forget about the production of basic parts in India, for faster induction benefits and this is such a case.
Fair Points & we should buildup at least till 2020(By that time our Nuclear deterrent will be mature enough to give Chinese a response they won't forget)