What's new

Babri mosque: The build-up to a demolition that shook India

bananarepublic

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 15, 2015
Messages
2,424
Reaction score
5
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Babri mosque: The build-up to a demolition that shook India

_98887792_ayodhya_023-1.jpg
Image copyrightPRAVEEN JAIN
Hindu mobs tore down the 16th Century Babri mosque in India's holy city of Ayodhya on 6 December 1992. The riots that followed killed nearly 2,000 people. A day before the incident, photographer Praveen Jain joined a group of Hindu volunteers to witness what they claimed was a "dress rehearsal" for the demolition. Here, he shares his pictures and tells his story of that day.

I arrived in Ayodhya on the foggy evening of 4 December 1992.

I was on an assignment with The Pioneer newspaper to take pictures of kar sevaks (Hindu volunteers) and Hindu radical leaders who were expected to gather at the Babri mosque site.

Thousands of workers belonging to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), an organisation dedicated to promoting Hindu nationalism, had already gathered. The RSS is the ideological fountainhead for Hindu groups, including the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) which now rules the country.

They planned to start the construction of a temple on the site that they believed was the birthplace of the Hindu God Ram. They had given a commitment not to touch the mosque and to restrict construction to a religious ceremony symbolising the laying of the first bricks.


A BJP MP I was in touch with told me there was going to be a rehearsal for the demolition of the Babri mosque on the morning of 5 December.

"I have orders from top bosses to ensure that no media is granted access to this exercise. But you are a friend and I am giving you this information," he told me.

_98887794_ayodhya_072.jpg
Image copyrightPRAVEEN JAIN
Disguised as a volunteer - wearing a saffron scarf, headband and a special entry badge on my jacket - I was escorted to the meeting ground the size of a football field a few yards from the mosque. Thousands of workers wearing saffron headbands and scarves had gathered there. The area was cordoned off by badge-wearing volunteers.

"This is the only way you can take photographs of the rehearsal. Stay close to me and shout slogans like the volunteers, blend in. This way you will be safe," the functionary told me.

A burly man suddenly stood before me gesturing me to put away my camera. I pointed to my badge and loudly shouted slogans like everyone else. He nodded and directed me to a large group of men standing at a distance.

I whipped out my camera and started taking pictures of the incredible scene unfolding before me.

Men with crowbars, pickaxes, shovels and iron rods were trying to topple a huge mound of earth.

Everything was done with precision. These were not mere volunteers but professionals who knew how to bring down a building.

_98887760_ayodhya_081.jpg
Image copyrightPRAVEEN JAIN
The Liberhan Commission (the government-appointed panel which tabled its report on the destruction of the Babri mosque in 2009) makes the following observation:

"It was averred before the Commission that a rehearsal was carried out for demolition of the disputed structure. Some photographs too were placed on record before the Commission. It will however not be safe to hazard finding about training in the absence of the conclusive evidence, though there is some circumstantial evidence and some statements do point finger to the conclusion that the Karsevaks were trained in demolition."

My photographs capture a man, the only one in the crowd of volunteers with his face covered by a handkerchief, barking orders at the men tugging away at the mound with ropes and iron wire meshes.

He appeared to be some sort of a leader of one of the right-wing parties and, therefore, didn't want to disclose his identity.

The mound was successfully toppled to loud cheers and lusty slogans from the volunteers.

I hid my camera inside my jacket and exited the place, chanted along with the crowd, thrilled that I was the only journalist to have witnessed this rehearsal and photographed it for posterity.

_98887758_pix-22.jpg
Image copyrightPRAVEEN JAIN
The next day, I along with other journalists took position on the fourth floor of a building overlooking the mosque and a raised platform where important leaders of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and BJP were overseeing a rally of at least 150,000 volunteers.

Even police guarding the site were shouting slogans. Just after noon, the crowd turned violent and charged at the policemen and volunteers guarding the mosque.

Some climbed to the fourth floor and attacked journalists and broke cameras of photographers in an effort to wipe out any photographic evidence of the demolition as it was under way a few metres away.

In the matter of a few hours the mosque was razed to the ground.

I ran as fast as my legs could carry me towards the hotel.

_98887756_ayodhya_045.jpg
Image copyrightPRAVEEN JAIN
Riots had already started. I looked around for policemen or anyone who could help, but people were shutting shops, closing doors and windows of their homes.

The day they brought down the mosque, I felt ashamed of being a Hindu.

I have deposed as a witness before the Liberhan Commission and still continue to be called by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) as a witness in the special court which is hearing the case on the demolition.

It has been 25 years, but none of the people responsible for the demolition have been punished.

Praveen Jain, a consultant photographer with Indian Express, spoke to Anasuya Basu.
 
.
the demolition of babri mosque took out the poison of communalism for 10 years of so from indian society, before it got back again slowly.
apparently 3 people died when the dome fell on them coz they were breaking the mosque with hammer and crowbar.... not sure if true...
 
.
A nice memoir of a event which I don't know is sad or not.

But Babri Masjid is gone and a Ram temple should be built. Muslims don't need a mosque at that place and if a temple buys peace then why not build a temple.
 
.
Unnecessary event, black day in Indian history. Muslims should negotiate and handover sites as Ayodhya, Mathura and Kashi for temple construction, there won't be a bigger CBM between communities
 
. .
Babri mosque: The build-up to a demolition that shook India

_98887792_ayodhya_023-1.jpg
Image copyrightPRAVEEN JAIN
Hindu mobs tore down the 16th Century Babri mosque in India's holy city of Ayodhya on 6 December 1992. The riots that followed killed nearly 2,000 people. A day before the incident, photographer Praveen Jain joined a group of Hindu volunteers to witness what they claimed was a "dress rehearsal" for the demolition. Here, he shares his pictures and tells his story of that day.

I arrived in Ayodhya on the foggy evening of 4 December 1992.

I was on an assignment with The Pioneer newspaper to take pictures of kar sevaks (Hindu volunteers) and Hindu radical leaders who were expected to gather at the Babri mosque site.

Thousands of workers belonging to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), an organisation dedicated to promoting Hindu nationalism, had already gathered. The RSS is the ideological fountainhead for Hindu groups, including the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) which now rules the country.

They planned to start the construction of a temple on the site that they believed was the birthplace of the Hindu God Ram. They had given a commitment not to touch the mosque and to restrict construction to a religious ceremony symbolising the laying of the first bricks.


A BJP MP I was in touch with told me there was going to be a rehearsal for the demolition of the Babri mosque on the morning of 5 December.

"I have orders from top bosses to ensure that no media is granted access to this exercise. But you are a friend and I am giving you this information," he told me.

_98887794_ayodhya_072.jpg
Image copyrightPRAVEEN JAIN
Disguised as a volunteer - wearing a saffron scarf, headband and a special entry badge on my jacket - I was escorted to the meeting ground the size of a football field a few yards from the mosque. Thousands of workers wearing saffron headbands and scarves had gathered there. The area was cordoned off by badge-wearing volunteers.

"This is the only way you can take photographs of the rehearsal. Stay close to me and shout slogans like the volunteers, blend in. This way you will be safe," the functionary told me.

A burly man suddenly stood before me gesturing me to put away my camera. I pointed to my badge and loudly shouted slogans like everyone else. He nodded and directed me to a large group of men standing at a distance.

I whipped out my camera and started taking pictures of the incredible scene unfolding before me.

Men with crowbars, pickaxes, shovels and iron rods were trying to topple a huge mound of earth.

Everything was done with precision. These were not mere volunteers but professionals who knew how to bring down a building.

_98887760_ayodhya_081.jpg
Image copyrightPRAVEEN JAIN
The Liberhan Commission (the government-appointed panel which tabled its report on the destruction of the Babri mosque in 2009) makes the following observation:

"It was averred before the Commission that a rehearsal was carried out for demolition of the disputed structure. Some photographs too were placed on record before the Commission. It will however not be safe to hazard finding about training in the absence of the conclusive evidence, though there is some circumstantial evidence and some statements do point finger to the conclusion that the Karsevaks were trained in demolition."

My photographs capture a man, the only one in the crowd of volunteers with his face covered by a handkerchief, barking orders at the men tugging away at the mound with ropes and iron wire meshes.

He appeared to be some sort of a leader of one of the right-wing parties and, therefore, didn't want to disclose his identity.

The mound was successfully toppled to loud cheers and lusty slogans from the volunteers.

I hid my camera inside my jacket and exited the place, chanted along with the crowd, thrilled that I was the only journalist to have witnessed this rehearsal and photographed it for posterity.

_98887758_pix-22.jpg
Image copyrightPRAVEEN JAIN
The next day, I along with other journalists took position on the fourth floor of a building overlooking the mosque and a raised platform where important leaders of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and BJP were overseeing a rally of at least 150,000 volunteers.

Even police guarding the site were shouting slogans. Just after noon, the crowd turned violent and charged at the policemen and volunteers guarding the mosque.

Some climbed to the fourth floor and attacked journalists and broke cameras of photographers in an effort to wipe out any photographic evidence of the demolition as it was under way a few metres away.

In the matter of a few hours the mosque was razed to the ground.

I ran as fast as my legs could carry me towards the hotel.

_98887756_ayodhya_045.jpg
Image copyrightPRAVEEN JAIN
Riots had already started. I looked around for policemen or anyone who could help, but people were shutting shops, closing doors and windows of their homes.

The day they brought down the mosque, I felt ashamed of being a Hindu.

I have deposed as a witness before the Liberhan Commission and still continue to be called by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) as a witness in the special court which is hearing the case on the demolition.

It has been 25 years, but none of the people responsible for the demolition have been punished.

Praveen Jain, a consultant photographer with Indian Express, spoke to Anasuya Basu.
thnks fr sharing first time i learnt what exactly transpired.

@Areesh biggest democracy ka haal check karo

the demolition of babri mosque took out the poison of communalism for 10 years of so from indian society, before it got back again slowly.
apparently 3 people died when the dome fell on them coz they were breaking the mosque with hammer and crowbar.... not sure if true...
was there a sound archeological evidence of a pre existing temple there?
 
.
A nice memoir of a event which I don't know is sad or not.

But Babri Masjid is gone and a Ram temple should be built. Muslims don't need a mosque at that place and if a temple buys peace then why not build a temple.

Why should they ..your saying that they should cower down in the face of extremism ...
Pity that people tell us Muslims to do more against extremism and yet they cower down in front of others.


Is there any archaeological evidence to support the notion of a temple being there ??
 
.
thnks fr sharing first time i learnt what exactly transpired.

@Areesh biggest democracy ka haal check karo

Are we surprised? A member parliament directly involved in demolishing a mosque. Preparing and having rehearsals for it.

Largest democracy :lol:
 
.
Is there any archaeological evidence to support the notion of a temple being there ??

http://www.rediff.com/news/2003/aug/25ayo1.htm

The report said there was archaeological evidence of a massive structure just below the disputed structure and evidence of continuity in structural activities from the 10th century onwards up to the construction of the disputed structure (Babri Mosque).

Among the excavation yields it mentioned were stone and decorated bricks, mutilated sculpture of divine couple, carved architectural members including foliage patterns, amalaka, kapotapali, doorjamb with semi-circular shrine pilaster, broken octagonal shaft of black schist pillar, lotus motif, circular shrine having pranjala (watershute) in the north and 50 pillar bases in association with a huge structure.
 
.
thnks fr sharing first time i learnt what exactly transpired.

@Areesh biggest democracy ka haal check karo


was there a sound archeological evidence of a pre existing temple there?
i would not be surprised if there is, because many mosques in north india is built upon temples, sometimes no effort to even demolish the temple(just a dome over temple).
however the main legal argument from babri majid side is not whether there was temple, but who the land belongs to. The land it seems belongs to muslims(sunni waqf board?). Even if there was temple, it will still make building temple unlawful.

There is no legal solution to it unless muslims give it to some hindu org, remember the law does not recognize muslim as a group or hindu as a group, but claimant to specific land by specific organization.

I think the last high court ruling gave 1/3 land to a hindu org, and 1/3 to a muslim org, that satisfied nobody... hindus wanted a temple on clear land, not share with a mosque, and muslims found it to be injustice that their land was taken away to build a temple. It looked more like a compromise solution by village elders, than judgement of a modern justice system.
 
.
i would not be surprised if there is, because many mosques in north india is built upon temples, sometimes no effort to even demolish the temple(just a dome over temple).
however the main legal argument from babri majid side is not whether there was temple, but who the land belongs to. The land it seems belongs to muslims(sunni waqf board?). Even if there was temple, it will still make building temple unlawful.

There is no legal solution to it unless muslims give it to some hindu org, remember the law does not recognize muslim as a group or hindu as a group, but claimant to specific land by specific organization.

I think the last high court ruling gave 1/3 land to a hindu org, and 1/3 to a muslim org, that satisfied nobody... hindus wanted a temple on clear land, not share with a mosque, and muslims found it to be injustice that their land was taken away to build a temple. It looked more like a compromise solution by village elders, than judgement of a modern justice system.
Thanks a great unbiased response. Thats a very biased unfair decision by a court seriously what has courts in india come down to. If the land belongs to hindu community their right will hold but if muslims it will be their land. If land belonged to hindus n same ruling was issued i would have called that out too cause its a matter of peoples property.

As of temples as long they were demolished many centuries back and new structures were errected and properties were held by individuals how on earth could anyone demand demolishing of such building? Were those hindus living in some medieval age where they felt todays modern laws are not going to be applied.

I always thought the land on which babri masjid was built was a goevrnment or public property and did not belong to some individual
 
.
Let's build a church there :cheesy:

On a serious note, if the two parties won't share the land and build whatever they want together, the only option might be to leave the land barren.
 
.
Thanks a great unbiased response. Thats a very biased unfair decision by a court seriously what has courts in india come down to. If the land belongs to hindu community their right will hold but if muslims it will be their land. If land belonged to hindus n same ruling was issued i would have called that out too cause its a matter of peoples property.

As of temples as long they were demolished many centuries back and new structures were errected and properties were held by individuals how on earth could anyone demand demolishing of such building? Were those hindus living in some medieval age where they felt todays modern laws are not going to be applied.

I always thought the land on which babri masjid was built was a goevrnment or public property and did not belong to some individual
I tried to write from a neutral point of view, but I would like to see a temple build there... just that there is no legal/moral way to do it. The only way out is if the muslim organization(that owns it) sell/donate land to some hindu org, but I doubt they will ever do it.

well, the hindu organizations that are fighting for temple do not agree that courts have any jurisdiction over matter of faith(but still fight in court)... its like 'if we win, its ok but if we lose then we don't care about verdict'.
 
. .
I tried to write from a neutral point of view, but I would like to see a temple build there... just that there is no legal/moral way to do it. The only way out is if the muslim organization(that owns it) sell/donate land to some hindu org, but I doubt they will ever do it.

well, the hindu organizations that are fighting for temple do not agree that courts have any jurisdiction over matter of faith(but still fight in court)... its like 'if we win, its ok but if we lose then we don't care about verdict'.

What legal? What moral bhai?

Muslims for the past 1300 years have been razing the places of worship of others and building their own on them.

Or just razing them because they symbolize faith in someone other than Allah.

Please. Lets cut this BS and build a grand temple on the land.

Cheers, Doc
 
.
Back
Top Bottom