What's new

Babri Masjid Case Ruling Today

and the majority dominate the minority once again....
Its not a question of victory of majority over minority. Its simple truth.

and for records.
Thats everywhere, I will not talk about a single country.
 
. .
and the majority dominate the minority once again....

Really? That's all you can come up with? Did you read the judgement, do you even know what the judgement is? Or did you just suddenly notice this thread and think, "Hey, those Hindus must have finished giving their biased judgement by now", and then rushed to type your comment? That's what it is, admit it.

What we have here is an equitable distribution of land which the majority considers sacred - virtually the Mecca of Hindus. And people still flame just for the sake of it? What would have happened if something similar were to be judged in Pakistan? We all know.
 
.
"1949 On December 23rd, Muslims finished their night prayer and left to their home. A shock was waiting for them, who came for fajr (dawn)prayer. Inside the Mosque a mob kept Rama, Laxamana, Sita statues and claimed that their God took avatar (appeared) inside the mosque and they started agitating against Muslims."

and after that a case was filed in faizabad and the rest you know all what happened despite court verdict of closing the site. Hindus broken the locks and started worship again leading to demolition in 92-3
lets not dig the past and sentionalize its atrocities, there are nudred other examples where Hinus have been killed by Muslims. But by digging it we are only going back ward.

Its time to accpt the fact that religion comes mkuch after somebodies nationality.
 
.
^^ Since we are going that far back in history, if a law suit was filed that pointed to historical evidence that Aryans came into what is now the subcontinent and displaced the native people from their abodes, would the court rule that Aryans should be kicked out?

The fact that the court is revisiting hundreds of years of history is in itself a bloody joke. And that it is being done at the expense of an already under-the-gun minority is the fungus ridden cherry on an inedible cake.
 
.
2/3 the actual mosque land went to RSS groupies. How it is not a win for majority hindus ?

Its not a victory for any party since all the litigants had laid their claim to the complete land.

The court has shot down the claims of all the litigants and has asked the land to be divided into 3 parts.
 
. .
^^ Since we are going that far back in history, if a law suit was filed that pointed to historical evidence that Aryans came into what is now the subcontinent and displaced the native people from their abodes, would the court rule that Aryans should be kicked out?

The fact that the court is revisiting hundreds of years of history is in itself a bloody joke. And that it is being done at the expense of an already under-the-gun minority is the fungus ridden cherry on an inedible cake.
what? Are we scoring debating points here? I dont think so.

The truth is this verdict has reflected national unity. I remember a day of Operation Blue star. it was another day.
 
.
^^ Since we are going that far back in history, if a law suit was filed that pointed to historical evidence that Aryans came into what is now the subcontinent and displaced the native people from their abodes, would the court rule that Aryans should be kicked out?

The fact that the court is revisiting hundreds of years of history is in itself a bloody joke. And that it is being done at the expense of an already under-the-gun minority is the fungus ridden cherry on an inedible cake.

Define an Aryan first
 
.
guys the matter is over
we can discuss about it next time when it comes up in supreme court
@ al my indian frndz
there is no need of explaining our democratic part to pakistani's coz they wont understand (not their mistake)
 
.
^^ Since we are going that far back in history, if a law suit was filed that pointed to historical evidence that Aryans came into what is now the subcontinent and displaced the native people from their abodes, would the court rule that Aryans should be kicked out?

The fact that the court is revisiting hundreds of years of history is in itself a bloody joke. And that it is being done at the expense of an already under-the-gun minority is the fungus ridden cherry on an inedible cake.


Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT) has been debunked completely by major world historians.
Search the net and you will find out the truth
 
.
^^ Since we are going that far back in history, if a law suit was filed that pointed to historical evidence that Aryans came into what is now the subcontinent and displaced the native people from their abodes, would the court rule that Aryans should be kicked out?

The fact that the court is revisiting hundreds of years of history is in itself a bloody joke. And that it is being done at the expense of an already under-the-gun minority is the fungus ridden cherry on an inedible cake.

For the ppl of India, this seemed to be the most logical way to resolve this issue and they are ready to abide by the judgement.

All outsiders can call it whatever they want to.
 
.
i honestly dont know what gives pakistanis the right to judge epecially when hindu temples are destroyed at a regular basis in ur country.

i typed "hindu temples demolished in pakistan" and u wont believe that temples are LEGALLY destroyed there

Don't post your manufactured BS here, most of those stories are made up by your third rate media.

IBNLive reported that a hindu temple has been destroyed in Karachi. With made up accounts of people and an overblown campaign to demonize Pakistan. Shown on TV and with all kinds of propaganda to go with it.

Land grabbers target Hindu temples in Pak

Pakistan hindu council is contacted and the patron of the council denies any such thing and says that if such a thing happens we can easily deal with it. But the indian media does not report it on TV and only choose to highlight their bullshit story and made the indian public go mad where they started writing despicable crap about all Pakistani's online.

No Lord Krishna temple demolished: Pak Hindu Council- Hindustan Times

And to top it all the person in charge of IBLLive, Rajdeep Serdesai is asked about this false accusation by a media person, and I quote the article:

"she said, nothing of the sort happened. Such practices only provoke acrimony, she maintained. Rajdeep Sardesai admitted to the reporter’s point, and said that the statement was issued by an Indian government functionary."
 
.
^^ Since we are going that far back in history, if a law suit was filed that pointed to historical evidence that Aryans came into what is now the subcontinent and displaced the native people from their abodes, would the court rule that Aryans should be kicked out?

Only if the dravidians decide to file a suit and if we can provide enough evidence in support of it.

But we are fine with Aryans because we dont think them as Aryans..rather as Indians.

Any problems sire.?
 
.
A small correction - 1/3 to Hindus,1/3 to Jains (they are not Hindus) and 1/3 to Muslims.

All have won.

Please be humane and put yourself in the wronged party's shoes. If someone demolishes your house and kills many members of your family, razes your place of worship to the ground, then makes you fight for your rights for 18 years, will you call being given back 1/3rd of what was rightfully yours a victory? Will you joyously celebrate that the people who murdered your family and destroyed your place of worship got 1/3rd of what was yours? Will you celebrate the fact that the killers are let go with no punishment?

You have a very warped sense of justice.

---------- Post added at 06:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:22 PM ----------

Only if the dravidians decide to file a suit and if we can provide enough evidence in support of it.

But we are fine with Aryans because we dont think them as Aryans..rather as Indians.

Any problems sire.?

WOW!!! And you don't think of muslims as Indians? Because that is the innuendo here...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom