What's new

Attempted IAF incursion - A Failed operation

Should we retaliate?

  • Yes

    Votes: 154 87.5%
  • No

    Votes: 22 12.5%

  • Total voters
    176
Right to respond, scrambled jets, dushman ki topein khamosh .------ This all sounds broken record now.
Agreed! Nation will not accept this kind of shitty response and we cannot let this one slide. India bombed on our side, we have to respond back even if that means we use a standoff weapon or wait for the time and place of our choosing.
 
. .
Man! what is it that you are finding so funny? As long as bombs fell on our side of the border, its an aggression and act of war which should be taken seriously and responded in kind even if that means destroying their trees.
exactly!! they entered our airspace and returned unharmed doesnt mater if they hit tree or not! counter narrative is we forced them to run away without gettinf their targets
 
.
Your excuses in your version of English reminds me of the great Bhawalpur saying " You are a Master of Farting without Fighting "
And there is a term to describe losers like you.....blind as a bat.
Do you recognise the jet in this image now loser.:lol:

images.jpeg
 
. .
I would say india 1 pakistan 0 , since we dont own palwama attack not counting it in.
Pakistan indebted by india after this strike.
 
.
Best Pakistani response, keeping our anger in mind, will be similar violation by PAF at Indian side and dropping couple of dummy bombs. That's it, I don't want further escalation.
 
.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ec8ed509d15_story.html?utm_term=.6dda28bdc367

Indian fighter jets cross into Pakistani territory, launch targeted airstrike

T35UR3RZPUI6TIDMH3EO2UE5CU.jpg

Pakistani protesters shout slogans and carry an effigy of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi during a protest against India, in Peshawar, Pakistan, on Monday, Feb. 25, 2019

February 26 at 2:35 AM
NEW DELHI — India launched an airstrike in Pakistan early Tuesday in an act of retaliation for a terrorist attack that killed 40 Indian paramilitary officers in Kashmir on Feb. 14.

India’s foreign secretary, Vijay Gokhale, told reporters that the strike targeted a training camp run by Jaish-e-Muhammad, the Pakistan-based militant group that claimed responsibility for the attack this month. He said a “large number” of militants were “eliminated” in the operation.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has faced intense pressure to respond to the Feb. 14 attack. Tuesday’s airstrike will inflame tensions between the two nuclear-armed rivals, who presented vastly differing pictures of what occurred in the incident.

According to Pakistan’s military spokesman, Maj. Gen. Asif Ghafoor, the Indian fighter jets crossed the line that divides much of Kashmir between India and Pakistan, a boundary that is not considered an international border.

He said they then dropped a “payload” near Balakot, which is about 25 miles away, just inside the Pakistani province of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa.

Faced with a “timely and effective response” from the Pakistan Air Force, the Indian jets released their “payload in haste while escaping,” the spokesman wrote on Twitter early Tuesday. “No casualties or damage.” He later posted a photo of what he said was debris from the strike, saying the bombs fell “in the open.”

Gokhale, India’s foreign secretary, said the Indian strike was based on “credible intelligence” that further attacks were being planned by Jaish-e-Muhammad, which is designated a terrorist organization by the United States.

He called the strike a “preemptive action” specifically targeting Jaish-e-Muhammad that was “conditioned by our desire to avoid civilian casualties.” The camp was located on a thickly forested hillside away from civilian dwellings, Gokhale said.

Tuesday’s operation appears to be the most significant retaliatory move by India against its neighbor since 2016. That year, militants stormed an Indian army base near the town of Uri in Kashmir, killing 19 soldiers.

In the wake of that attack, the Modi government launched what it called “surgical strikes” by commandos across the heavily militarized frontier that separates Indian- and Pakistani-controlled Kashmir. Pakistan denied that such cross-border raids took place.

India accuses Pakistan of sheltering and supporting groups like Jaish-e-Muhammad, something Pakistan denies. Since 1989, militant groups have waged an insurgency to end Indian rule in Kashmir. The Himalayan region has been divided between India and Pakistan for more than 70 years.
 
.
Real Story Behind India’s “Air Strike” and Why PAF Didn’t Shoot Down the Jets
Posted 26 mins ago by Aamir Attaa
jets.jpg




    • Sources familiar with the matter confirmed that IAF jets were showing up on radars continuously throughout Indian Occupied Kashmir since midnight. While Pakistani Air Force has been on high alert for several days now, it was around 3:30 AM tonight that PAF had to scramble for two incoming fighter jets that crossed the line.

      However, before PAF jets could intercept, the intruding jets realized that they violated Pakistan’s airspace and turned back quickly.

      First things first: IAF Jets didn’t reach Balakot, instead they didn’t cross the LoC by more than 4-5 KMs only.
 
. .
Really ? Local resident seems to have different account..


He said 1 person was injured. You said 200-300 terrorists were killed?

What then is the DG ISPR talking of ?

Can you tell me what you are interpreting of the ISPR tweets? I am curious.

By admission of ISPR, we are already winning the media war.

What is in the ISPR admission that you think favours you?
 
. . .
They have bombed Pakistani soil....period...no matter they bombed barren lands or camps....they have bombed us...where is Khan? Where is retaliation?.....?

Potiyans = shame on you and your cult leader....
Calm down dude, PAF can go and hit their soil at will but we are not like these Indians who swallow everything thrown at them.
 
.
No shit, no one is saying they didn't have intent to bomb. We are saying they didn't bomb, i.e. didn't succeed in their intentions.

That's not what ISPR saying.


Payload =/= fuel tank. But ofcourse ISPR, being a propaganda agency, put their own twist on it and tried to pass off fuel tank wreckage released by jets during return as payload, instead of actually denying that any payload was released (this is major fail on their part).

Then you guys can prove the strikes were real. Show the video footage of the bombs being launched. Take ISPR out of the picture.

Oh we will. But right now there is no hurry - right now the onus is on Pak to spin a story that "nothing happened. Everything normal here. Go back to homes". Hence all that rush by PR to spin a narrative for public consumption.

The precedent seems to be that India can claim to carry out a fake surgical strike and Indian population will gobble it up.

The precedent is that 12 jets cross in Pak-controlled airspace, finish their job and return. And PAF does nothing. :rofl:
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom