AUz
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2010
- Messages
- 8,595
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
What a retarded post ,when 2/3rds of your country is a barren desert wasteland, it's not surprising that the death toll was low. More than the scale of the disaster, its the location that matters, those 3 indian states had way more population than Balochistan. Even a small disaster striking a populated area can cause way higher casualties than a large disaster in the middle of nowhere, look at the the earthquake that killed 100,000 in your shithole country back in 2005, thats like more than the combned death toll of all indian natural disaster combined since independence.
Btw, this "once in a century" rainfall that you got is considered a severe drought in India ,your country became an open air gutter with like 400mm of rain, even the arid parts of Rajasthan get that much, we have places that get twice that amount in a single day.
Cow pee drinkers can clutch at the straws but facts dont change. Its not about population, its about india being a backward sh*tole lacking management infrastructure and disaster management capacity as a state...where Pakistan surpasses your garbage dump that you call a state. Its not about population. Lets take Covid example....that does not depend on geography, and it was a global virus impacting vast populations across the world. Yet, your sh*thole lost 17x more people than Pakistan
And remember, india went into disastrous lockdowns while Pakistan did not. We quickly established a centrally-commanded disaster management center with real-time data & AI-aided projections of local viral clusters and did targeted control---achieving far more effective results in controlling the deadly pandemic. While your countrymen were bathing in COW SHITTTT fight corona HAHAHAHAHA Typical pajeets: