As the Doklam crisis continues to linger, Bhutan seems to be drifting away from India

[Figaro]

China back then was dubbed as "Factory of the World", and India called themselves "The Office of the World", implying a sense of superiority. A few years ago, when Modi recalculated GDP growth, and the prevailing sentiment in India was "Move Over, China!" and "India will be the engine of world economy from here on".

These excitable people never cease to amuse the world.

When the hell was India dubbed "the office of the world"? Are they referring to a dirty slum as their "office"? India's IT industry only employed a couple million of people max during its peak years ... now compare that to India's population of over 1.3 billion. I'd venture out to say that even the worst of Chinese sweatshops were better than the so called Indian "offices".

 

[Han Patriot]

When the hell was India dubbed "the office of the world"? Are they referring to a dirty slum as their "office"? India's IT industry only employed a couple million of people max during its peak years ... now compare that to India's population of over 1.3 billion. I'd venture out to say that even the worst of Chinese sweatshops were better than the so called Indian "offices".

I actually saw a documentary on the homes of these so called middle class IT workers, slums by Chinese standards.

 

[Paludism]

They're not Hindu Nazis; they're Aryan wannabes. Indians hate their racial identity and try their best to convince people that they're "Aryan" and Caucasian even though they're genetically closer to sub-Saharans (who are also proud of their race). Indians seem to be the only group who are ashamed of their racial identity ... sad

The thing here is, Hitler just borrowed the word "Aryans" from the Persian / Sanskrit script to deem themselves as "Blue-eyed Blonds (Nobles)", and here we have these wobbler heads thinking that they are actually Aryans.
Inferiority complex has no bounds.

 

[boxer_B]

This:

Or this：

This:

Or this:

...

Are you lying or just ignorant ?
Most probably the former.
By ICJ did you mean that kangaroo arbitration court set up by that anti China Japanese.
Then read this.
http://globalnation.inquirer.net/141125/arbitral-court-not-a-un-agency
Arbitral court not a UN agency
The United Nations said on Wednesday it has nothing to do with the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), which set up a tribunal that handled the South China Sea arbitration case the Philippines filed unilaterally in 2013.

View attachment 421328
.

China is signatory to PCA. The jargons can be mixed up but China cannot be its member and then not accept the ruling. Secondly, I would like to see where CCP said Japanese national was biased in decision.

Parties of the Permanent Court of Arbitration
according to the convention of 1907
according to the convention of 1899
not a party

I think he is a clueless dude just pick up some sound bits here and there. ICJ has nothing to do with NSG, let alone a vote 47-1. "Free Media" is a disaster for the folks like him.

Displayed high Chinese IQ again. Next time read slow or use another engine to translate from English to Cantonese/Mandarin.

China remained the last major obstacle in the way of India's membership bid in the Nuclear Suppliers Group as 47 of 48 members supported New Delhi's application at the group's special plenary session in Seoul on Thursday.

 

[sinait]

China is signatory to PCA. The jargons can be mixed up but China cannot be its member and then not accept the ruling. Secondly, I would like to see where CCP said Japanese national was biased in decision.

You are very funny.
Why would China bother about the Japanese and his kangaroo arbitration court since China is not taking part.
UNCLOS provides for members to invoke opt-out clause of Article 298 from compulsory arbitration, which many members did.
Or did you Mr Chairman of PCA changed the rules.
Actually the US with their puppet Japanese did change the rules whenever they deem fit.
.

 

[boxer_B]

You are very funny.
Why would China bother about the Japanese and his kangaroo arbitration court since China is not taking part.
UNCLOS provides for members to invoke opt-out clause of Article 298 from compulsory arbitration, which many members did.
Or did you Mr Chairman of PCA changed the rules.
Actually the US with their puppet Japanese did change the rules whenever they deem fit.
.

You danced the deflected the question.

> Why signatory to biased PCA?
> When did CCP accused Japanese for biased decision?

 

[sinait]

You danced the deflected the question.

> Why signatory to biased PCA?
> When did CCP accused Japanese for biased decision?

1st you must ask the USA why sign on to the ICJ and then withdraw when decision on Nicaragua went against them.
When China signed on to the PCA long ago, it didn't realized that it is such a stooge to the USA.
Did I say anything about the Japanese except that he set up a kangaroo arbitration court ?
Frankly I got no time to find out more about this good for nothing Japanese.
.

 

[GR!FF!N]

If you actually read Bhutanese publications, you'd see that they're much more afraid of an Indian invasion than a Chinese one.

any source???