Artefact discovered at Umerkot Fort

[Water Car Engineer]

Yeah. It is stupid to post Hinduism tinted pics when they have nothing to do with the picture of OP.

@Water Car Engineer is just as insecure about his Bharatiness as some little village guy in UP or Bihar.


Sorry to see.

None of those examples are pointing at Hinduism. Like 60% are Buddhist related actually. (who cares anyways) And Im not even a Hindu. Broad swords and those bangles are styles that existed in the subcontinent to a certain point. And are shown in the artifact. I simply expanded on it, referencing other places all over the subcontinent with similar dating. Some people pointed out the pointed hats, etc. What's the matter? Rather it might be your insecurities talking with your personal jabs.

 

[FaujHistorian]

None of those examples are pointing at Hinduism. Like 60% are Buddhist related actually. (who cares anyways) And Im not even a Hindu. Broad swords and those bangles are styles that existed in the subcontinent to a certain point. And are shown in the artifact. I simply expanded on it, referencing other places all over the subcontinent with similar dating. Some people pointed out the pointed hats, etc. What's the matter? Rather it might be your insecurities talking with your personal jabs.

Don't want to discuss your personal religion etc.

I was hoping that people will post the pics that really match the era and style.

yours do not. you are forcing those insecure ideas. Sadly.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Don't want to discuss your personal religion etc.

I was hoping that people will post the pics that really match the era and style.

yours do not. you are forcing those insecure ideas. Sadly.

The art doesnt need to match. Just like Scythian art examples with that cap doesn't need to match.

Like I said. Stylistically, certain clothing and weaponry existed at certain dates, then fell out of use. You can use examples of it from all over the subcontinent. I used Gandhara, Sanchi, etc. After a certain date, you want see those heavy bangles for example.

You can tell it's not in the Islamic era from things the characters are wearing alone.

 

[pakdefender]

The art doesnt need to match. Just like Scythian art examples with that cap doesn't need to match.

Like I said. Stylistically, certain clothing and weaponry existed at certain dates, then fell out of use. You can use examples of it from all over the subcontinent. I used Gandhara, Sanchi, etc. After a certain date, you want see those heavy bangles for example.

You can tell it's not in the Islamic era from things the characters are wearing alone.

Insecure much ? Behaving like the typical Bharti we have come to know

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Insecure much ? Behaving like the typical Bharti we have come to know

Lol, all you can do is get personal. You're the one that's insecure, get rid of it troll.

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

Another thread about our history ruined by insecure dravidian Bhaiya from UP/Bihar.

 

[pakdefender]

Lol, all you can do is get personal. You're the one that's insecure, get rid of it troll.

You people are so predictable , just a few posts back I said I can see where this thread is heading and you just proved it

 

[Water Car Engineer]

You people are so predictable , just a few posts back I said I can see where this thread is heading and you just proved it

In what way? You getting your panties in a twist? You not even posting anything historical at all. You not liking what you see?

If it was Scythian, Greek, etc. art that was referenced, Im sure you wouldn't have commented. But your insecurity took over, when you see Bharti stuff. Everything I posted relates in some way, maybe read the stuff?

Basically what im trying to say is.

 

[pakdefender]

In what way? You getting your panties in a twist? You not even posting anything historical at all. You not liking what you see?

If it was Scythian, Greek, etc. art that was referenced, Im sure you wouldn't have commented. But you got insecurity took over, when you see Bharti stuff. Everything I posted relates in some way.

Basically what im trying to say is.

Nope , nothing you posted is in any way relevant to the OP , you just displayed your insecurity by posting bharat trash that neither resembles nor relate to the artefact found in Pakistan

 

[ShahidT]

All he could say was that the inscription below the hand-carved image seemed to be in the Hindi, Gujrati or Gurmukhi language.

“This seems to be a gravestone traditionally placed on the grave or tomb of a prominent personality,” he said, adding that such images and inscriptions could be found on similar artefacts discovered at Jain temples of Tharparkar district.

Artefact discovered at Umerkot Fort - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

why no one focusing on the inscription? i'd be interested to find out after they analyze what it is, and probably holds the most important clue. though i think gurmuki and hindi can be ruled out as they were developed only 4-5 centuries ago, and i think this artefact belongs to an earlier period before Islam had spread into the northern plains. i agree with @Chak Bamu in leaning towards a native origin of this artefact, as nomadic scythians(an iranian people) originally did not use indic scripts/language. by the time they adopted local culture they were assimilated into natives and lost all trace of anything 'scythian' anyway. btw i can find similar helmet/hats in artefacts depicting rajput and gujjar warriors.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Nope , nothing you posted is in any way relevant to the OP , you just displayed your insecurity by posting bharat trash that neither resembles nor relate to the artefact found in Pakistan

Let me tell you what I just did.

If people 1000 years find this photo in America which is undated.

But have close references that's similar in Canada, but is dated.

You can put a date because of the similar gear and weaponry. Because of the date able photo found in Canada.

Certain styles like broad swords, heavy bangles, etc. are common in Gandhara through East India and the Deccan at a certain point in time. You understand?? Punjab and Sindh are in between these areas, it relates in every way.

But you be all emo about it, I be like -

 

[pakdefender]

Let me tell you what I just did.

If people 1000 years find this photo in America which is undated.

But have close references they have that's similar in a Canada, but which is dated.

You can put a date because of the similar gear and weaponry. Because of the date able photo found in Canada.

Certain styles like broad swords, heavy bangles, etc. are common in Gandhara through East India and the Deccan at a certain point in time. You understand?? Punjab and Sindh are in between these areas, it relates in every way.

But you be all emo about it, I be like -

You just acted out your insecurity which is all too common among Indians when it comes to ancient archeological finds in Pakistan , that's the real truth

 

[Water Car Engineer]

You just acted out your insecurity which is all too common among Indians when it comes to ancient archeological finds in Pakistan , you are fooling no one

You basically no nothing about history at all. Didnt post one thing that has anything to do with history.

Annnddd

Good day mad sir

 

[pakdefender]

You basically no nothing about history at all. Didnt post one thing that has anything to do with history.

Annnddd

Good day mad sir

Haha. .. Desperation and insecurity is quite palpable

Pakistan as a separate entity from India , with its own history and archeology makes Indians very insecure , don't really know why but that's just the way Indians are