What's new

Army may intervene if violence continues after elections: NYT

extra terrestrial

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Messages
1,722
Reaction score
1
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
There is a possibility of intervention of the army in the politics of Bangladesh if street violence continues after the parliamentary elections to be held in January 5, The New York Times (NYT) said on Wednesday.

In the wake of a boycott of the elections by the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), the turnout could be far lower, which may trigger political instability and street demonstrations to demand a new round of elections.

"That raises the possibility that the Bangladeshi military, in the name of national stability, might declare a state of emergency," speculates the NYT.

Bangladesh remains a poor country, but one that has achieved real progress. Health indexes have improved markedly, and income per capita has risen.

But the continuing political violence is damaging the economy and alienating the public, said NYT, one of the leading newspapers of the United States.

Business leaders are calling for a political compromise, as the violence has shut down factories and other commerce. Leaders in the country's powerful garment industry say the strikes have caused delays in meeting deadlines and may deter foreign investors.

"Yet, in the end, it will all come down to the "two ladies (Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and the Leader of the Opposition Begum Khaleda Zia)," and whether they can look past their bitter history and find a way to hold an election on Jan. 5," the NYT said in the last line of the report.

The poisonous rivalry between the two leaders has created a dangerous impasse, eliciting growing international concern, as both women engage in a bitter game to become the next prime minister.

The issue is whether the two can agree on how the coming elections will be conducted.

For nearly two years, Mrs. Zia and other opposition leaders have demanded that Mrs. Hasina and her government step down shortly before the parliamentary elections so that an impartial caretaker government can oversee the polling - as Bangladesh has done on several occasions. If not, Mrs. Zia says her party will not participate in the elections.

But Mrs. Hasina has refused, arguing that Bangladesh's institutions are stable enough to conduct elections and that she is merely abiding by the national Constitution. That is where things now stand, with neither leader willing to budge, even as the damage to the country rises.

"Common sense decrees that the two ladies should work out a compromise," said a senior Bangladeshi diplomat and longtime political observer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of angering either of the two leaders. "At the moment, the country is paying a big price in law and order."

When Bangladesh's chief election commissioner last week fixed Jan. 5 as the date for national elections, the response was grimly predictable. Men rushed into the streets to set cars on fire, and soon the wailing horns of police cruisers and fire trucks blared through the darkened capital

Since Nov. 26, at least two dozen people have died across the country as the Bangladesh Nationalist Party has staged nationwide strikes, blocking roads and train trestles, to protest the elections.

Throughout the year, Mrs. Zia's opposition party has pressed its demands through these strikes, known as hartals, which have inflicted growing damage on the national economy.

Army may intervene if violence continues after elections: NYT | LAST PAGE | Financial Express :: Financial Newspaper of Bangladesh
 
Isn't the Bangladeshi military already compromised? All Awami back officers appointed on crucial positions or something along those lines?
 
So?o_O BAL cant buy entire military.:help:

Well if the Bangladeshis on this forum are to be believed, then the Bangladesh Army is just a BAL stooge, and BAL an Indian stooge.

They don't need to buy the whole army, just the top officers. The soldiers need to follow the orders of their officers, doubt they d revolt against their officers. Win win either case :D
 
If per capita income risen, health indexes really improved then why they are in such conflict ?

Same old debate of..you know what ?
 
This will hurt our foreign relations.:coffee:


So?o_O BAL cant buy entire military.:help:
1.JRB's impotence when Sheikh was getting killed should prove no body buys the loyalty of the armed forces.Yahya,Zia and Mush are PA examples. In the face of nation-wide political agitation, commanders can remain loyal to the political leadership to a limit.Beyond that there may be internal combustion from Bengalee troops who are politically conscious.

2.Only people hurt will be Indians. Otherwise our foreign relations will be pursued in the interest of BD.
 
Isn't the Bangladeshi military already compromised? All Awami back officers appointed on crucial positions or something along those lines?

Yeah military is compromised...india and Awami League made it possible sucking 70 army officers blood.

This will hurt our foreign relations.:coffee:


So?o_O BAL cant buy entire military.:help:


Previously our foreign relations grew by some army administrators not by these democratic ones...no?
 
Well if the Bangladeshis on this forum are to be believed, then the Bangladesh Army is just a BAL stooge, and BAL an Indian stooge.

They don't need to buy the whole army, just the top officers. The soldiers need to follow the orders of their officers, doubt they d revolt against their officers. Win win either case :D
No one can buy armed force loyalty, take history of Pakistan as example.

If per capita income risen, health indexes really improved then why they are in such conflict ?

Same old debate of..you know what ?
Our govt did not worked alot.:tdown:

They just have to ensure uninterrupted power supply, well transport connections and maintain good foreign relations. Then our economy will rise automatically.:agree:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom