What's new

Arabs slam Pak stand on Yemen and Call on Pakistani Parliament to Fall in Line

Gulf states should make Pakistan pay heavy price by seizing properties and assets of Pakistani politicians and businessmen like zardari,nawaz sharif,Ishaq Dar,Malik Riaz,Mian Mansha etc etc (please,please please.....)

Dubai would simply collapse into financial ruin because the housing market is interrelated with the rule of law where property rights must be protected to increase and maintain investors confidence of a stable market. Obviously the same economic attributes cannot be applied across all Gulf States, however Dubai is a key significant component of the overall governance structure of the UAE peninsula.
 
. .
Extremely sensible analysis by Najam Shetty.

- Pakistan establishment/leadership has no gut to say no to Saidi
- Pakistan will send troops to Saudi in the name of protecting Saudia. Leadership will give past reference to support current action. Actually Pak troop will fight in Yemen
- Pakistani force will work actually under Saudi commend but will not be accepted publically in the name of joint command

What a situation for a nuclear power!!! China is a much better friend for Pakistan than Muslim brothers

This particular analysis is flawed and pathetic in nature, but hardly surprising when Nejam Sethi is the individual sprouting such diabolical nonsense. The Establishment and the political leadership in Pakistan have sent a clear message to Saudi Arabia and this can be easily deciphered when Parliament rejected the idea of sending a military contingency force to Yemen. Pakistan currently has 1000 troops in Saudi Arabia for protecting the holy sites so your point becomes irrelevant, but hardly surprising since Indians in respect to this topic have no prior knowledge. The military establishment have decided not to intervene because economically, logistically and politically the outcome would be disastrous for Pakistan. This leaves a huge dilemma to the Saudi government because they simply do not have the manpower to successfully launch an invasion into Yemen, as majority of there troops are stationed for defense purposes of restricting foreigners from entering there territory (ISIS).
 
.
CCZMWoQW4AAQKu9.jpg


CCZMWoQW0AAGQ8-.jpg


CCZMWoUWIAADXap.jpg
 
.
Times like these i remember the turks in the 50s with the korean war. The koreans never a paid a dimes to turkey nor offerred their citizens iqama. But when the war started turkey became the second country to pour in troops and took heaviest casualties. There was no religious links ummah bhai bhai nonsense. They did it because a country was in trouble and they jumped it. No excuses.

Fast forward and koreans are one of the biggest turkish investers and helpers. Today every south korean has a sense of duty to a turk for that sacrifice.

Shames pakistan completely.


It's a shame you don't know history of Pakistan and KSA but know South Korean history. Pakistan throughout the decades has supported KSA. In 1969, PAF sent pilots to fly in the RSAF to attack Yemeni militants making incursions into Saudi Arabia, no Arab country came to help Saudis. That's just one example.

So where are our billions of dollars in investment?
 
.
Don't you think this decision has to do with Iran Pakistan relationship ? Iran already warned of consequences to these Arab forces even though it underlined with call for peace between two sides. If there was no Iran interest Pakistan would had gone with it . Has it has to do what these oil rich Arabs may say due to lots of debt Pakistan owe to them. Iranians are not Saudis but warriors of the Islamic world !
No it has not much to do with Iran but with Pakistans internal sectarian situation since this war is made to be sectarian.
Explain the underlined part,especially Iran being warriors of the Islamic world?
 
.
Well, again you did not understand. Maybe you have comprehension problem. If ever the situation becomes so bad, Iran can always cut down the pistachio trees and harvest wheat. No need to go hungry. Can Saudi Arabia do that?



How much food you produced last year?
Kid grow up if iran grow so much wheat than they won't buy from Ukraine they have payment issues due to sanctions that why they dealt with pak for wheat on barter trade .
 
.
No it has not much to do with Iran but with Pakistans internal sectarian situation since this war is made to be sectarian.
Explain the underlined part,especially Iran being warriors of the Islamic world?
Don't mind the Indians. In one thread they will go and say Iran is the true islamic power and in another they say Saudis are the leaders of the ummah. They just want to create fitnah.
 
.
@DESERT FIGHTER
shut ur ugly mouth.. u r nothing but shyyyt.. dont have anything to say so now u went to cursing... that proves my point that ur an ugly retard and shyyt. and i dont have time to respond to ur stupid childish posts.... now shut up get lost..
.. Retarded UMMAH thumper... :lol:
 
Last edited:
.
He called on the Parliament to fall in line with the will of people in this critical circumstances, the Arab and Islamic World is living through and to back the stance of the government and people of Pakistan that supports the Decisive Storm coalition.
Ok, 'will' of which people? The Arabs or Pakistanis? If the latter, then the people of Pakistan have spoken through their parliament. If it's the will of the Arab people, then the Arabs need to mind their own business. They can't force their will on a sovereign country.

And why the heck can't the Arabs learn to fight their own damn wars instead of asking others to do it for them?

Fighting a war by proxy? Is Arab blood too holy to shed?
 
.
Have we made those requests? and if we did, were those rejected or went unanswered? When we needed arms and ammo in 1971, the Saudis asked us to leave behind what was needed by the KSA forces in an event of emergency and take the remaining. What else could they do? No, they'll not fight for us of-course, and frankly, do you really want Saudi forces to fight alongside your highly professional and trained forces? I don't think so.

Hahaha, see that is funny and that is precisely why they want our trained men. But a couple of squadrons of Tornados for interdiction and a couple of squadrons of Typhoons to be fully flown by Pakistan in case of hostilities would be nice. What do you say? And perhaps a 5-6 billion USD grant to purchase a new surface fleet for the navy. China has helped us more than these Muslim Ummah. Sure, we'll ride their horses into battle for them then.
 
.
Hahaha, see that is funny and that is precisely why they want our trained men. But a couple of squadrons of Tornados for interdiction and a couple of squadrons of Typhoons to be fully flown by Pakistan in case of hostilities would be nice. What do you say? And perhaps a 5-6 billion USD grant to purchase a new surface fleet for the navy. China has helped us more than these Muslim Ummah. Sure, we'll ride their horses into battle for them then.
You have not replied to my questions. Have we made requests that were turned down by the Saudis? If yes,than I agree with you but if not, why are we blaming them for no help?

Secondly, financing military hardware etc., could have been discussed only if we agree to send our troops to bolster KSA's defense and free up their forces so they could take part in the offensive without concerning too much about the internal security. However, these things come from negotiations but if you simply shut the door in the first instance then what? China has perhaps helped you more (again I need to see some figures here) than Muslim ummah because she produces the military hardware and able to hand over to you on soft loans. What Muslim ummah produces that she will help you with? At any rate, during 1965, even Indonesia helped us so it appears to be a blanket statement that ummah never helped us. You are angry and agitated for whatever the reason and in your anger ignoring the help we have got for the Muslims countries.
 
.
This is a world where money talks and oil money talks a lot. What Pakistani's have to realise is Isam and Arabs is not the same thing. The oil Arabs treat Pakistani like dogs. I already posted how Oil Arabs provide $30 billion to India and Pakistan gets $8 billion. Could our country do with another $30? All the Saudi have to do is just allow only Pakistani citizens to get work permits. THe Europeans do it. EC only allows other EC citizens in.

However the Saudi kick us like as if we the Pakistani are dogs. Read this link. After reading this it makes mockery of so called 'Ummah' and a every Pakistani with 'Izzat' should put their down in shame. The SAudi humiliated us in front of the world. Note they even exclude India from this ban.

And I have no malice against any Saudi at a personal level or any member here but this is the reality. Arabs have to understand this and presure their governments to treat Pakistani at least like humans and if not as fellow Muslims.

Saudi Arabia: Men banned from marrying some expat women - BBC News

But men are apparently banned altogether from marrying expat workers from Pakistan, Bangladesh, Chad and Burma. Unofficial statistics say that Saudi Arabia, which already has a very large foreign workforce - some estimate it at nine million people or 30% of the population - has about 500,000 female residents from those four countries.

The move has raised eyebrows in the Gulf and Pakistani press. Comments on the the Pakistani Dawn newspaper site range from accusing the kingdom of racism to suggesting "our women are safe now". And the Saudi Gazette asks why women from these four countries are singled out in particular. The Saudi government has not commented officially on the report.

Shame, Shame, Shame.
 
.
Dubai would simply collapse into financial ruin because the housing market is interrelated with the rule of law where property rights must be protected to increase and maintain investors confidence of a stable market. Obviously the same economic attributes cannot be applied across all Gulf States, however Dubai is a key significant component of the overall governance structure of the UAE peninsula.
I doubt it would collapse but it would certainly suffer.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom