Altaf Hussain Released on Bail Without Any Charges

[Hyde]

British justice system?
Which was build upon on a unwritten constitution?
What about princess Diana case?
What british system has done on that ?
Sorry maybe you are , mesmorised by the normal standerds of thier judicial system, but belive me its not much just as our , peoples thinks ?

What happened in Diana case? Al Fayed claimed that his son (Dodi al Fayed) and Lady Diana must have been killed but he was not able to prove anything. It was apparently a natural accident. Now if someone claims otherwise he has to prove it in the court of law. Mohammad Al Fayed failed to do that... so what can I say about it.

Conspiracy theories can be hatched about anybody but it is not a miracle if a true accident would have taken place.

 

[Indus Falcon]

 

[airmarshal]

On bail, dumb! Which means the case is still there, it has not been dropped. Police is investigating, it can bring him back or lay charges.

Isnt that enough of a humiliation that person whom you MQM guys think is god, had to go to jail even if briefly and on charges of corruption. You always maintained that MQM is not corrupt. Well its leader is being investigated for money laundering.

 

[batmannow]

What happened in Diana case? Al Fayed claimed that his son (Dodi al Fayed) and Lady Diana must have been killed but he was not able to prove anything. It was apparently a natural accident. Now if someone claims otherwise he has to prove it in the court of law. Mohammad Al Fayed failed to do that... so what can I say about it.

Conspiracy theories can be hatched about anybody but it is not a miracle if a true accident would have taken place.

Neutral accident ?
THE MURDER OF PRINCESS DIANA
THE MURDER OF PRINCESS DIANA


On October 20 2003, Paul Burrell, Princess Diana's butler and close personal friend, revealed that months before she lost her life in a road crash, Diana claimed in a letter there was a plot to kill her in a car "accident", according to published extracts which reignited the widely held belief that she was murdered by her own government. "This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous". The princess then identified where she felt the threat and danger would come from: "Prince Charles is planning 'an accident' in my car, brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry".
Diana wrote this to Burrell, 10 months before she was killed in a car crash in a Paris underpass on August 31, 1997. Also killed in the crash were Diana's lover Dodi Fayed and the driver of their limousine. Dodi, 42, and Diana, 36, were in the back seat of their car when it crashed. Only Diana's bodyguard survived. Burrell said he had released the letter in the hope that it would lead to an inquest and a "thorough investigation of the facts by the British authorities". Dodi's father, Egyptian-born tycoon Mohammed Al Fayed, has long campaigned for a public inquiry, claiming the crash was the result of foul play.

Burrell, once described by Diana as her "rock", later sold his story to the Daily Mirror, in which he claimed the queen warned him that his close relationship with the princess could put him in danger. "There are powers at work in this country about which we have no knowledge," the queen is claimed to have told the former butler. Diana's letter reflects her understanding of the diabolical nature of the Royal Family, the House of Windsor, and British intelligence.
Before sealing the letter in an envelope marked "Paul', the princess told Burrell: "I'm going to date this and I want you to keep it. Just in case." Burrell writes in his book -- "But, with the benefit of hindsight, the content of that letter has bothered me since her death." Burrell said Diana believed she was regarded as a nuisance once she and Prince Charles were divorced in 1996. The cover story for Diana's murder was cast in stone with a French inquiry in 1999 that concluded the car crashed because the driver had been drinking and traveling too fast.

Most people are shocked by the idea that Diana was murdered. However, with full knowledge of how MI6 carries out assassinations, and from eyewitness testimony, this is the most likely account of what really happened that night in Paris. After a meal, the couple decided to make their way to Dodi's private apartment at Rue Arsene-Houssaye. However, their Mercedes was prevented from proceeding along its preferred route - a car blocked the way along the Avenue de Champ Elysees - thus forcing the Mercedes onto the route that leads to the tunnel at the Point d'Alma. None of the two cars or motorbike chasing the Mercedes at this point contained any paparazzi - they all appeared in the first couple of minutes after the crash.

As the Mercedes approached the tunnel it was being chased by two vehicles and one motorbike - one of the vehicles (a white Fiat Uno) rammed the Mercedes just before the crash. As the Mercedes got nearer the tunnel, a motorbike prevented one car (driven by Brenda Wells) from taking the approach road that lead to the tunnel. A remote-controlled device was likely used - causing an explosion (reported by CNN) which was heard by witnesses - that disabled the driving controls and electronics of the Mercedes. A laser strobe light was also seen by witnesses, which was used to blind the driver on the final seconds before it entered the tunnel - which some witnesses claim was completely dark as the lights had been turned off minutes earlier. A laser beam was being flashed into the eyes of the chauffeur, Henri Paul, causing the Mercedes to crash inside the Pont De L'Alma tunnel. Witnesses told British detectives they saw a motorcyclist point a laser into the eyes of Paul. One witness said he saw "an enormous radar-like flash of light.

After hearing an explosion and then a bang, witnesses ran to the scene - only to be told to "back off" by an unknown person who ran towards them out of the tunnel from the direction of the crashed car. A second person, whose identity was also unknown, was seen in the Mercedes removing the drivers head off the car horn. Witnesses also report that a helicopter was seen above just before the crash - was it monitoring events on the ground? Since the electricity had been cut in the tunnel, the traffic cameras did not work, thus ensuring there is no video evidence of the Mercedes final approach to the tunnel, or what vehicles can be seen leaving it. One witness, Gary Hunter saw two vehicles race out of the tunnel, others also saw a motorbike.

MI6 certainly had the means to kill Princess Diana by faking a car crash. In 1992, for example, former MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson says they planned to kill President Milosevic by using a fake car crash in Geneva. In 1996, according to the former MI6 agent David Shayler, they failed in their attempt to kill the Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi - but the car bomb they used killed scores of Libyan civilians (thus, Gaddafi, who has survived at least three attempts made on his life by western intelligence services, was also the only leader of a country to openly speculate that MI6 had killed Diana).
One of the likely reasons behind the murder is that Britain's establishment found her relationship with Egyptian Dodi Fayed utterly unacceptable, and so conspired with the intelligence services to have them killed. French medics from the hospital where the princess died claim she was pregnant at the time of the crash. This would support the belief that Diana and her lover were killed to avoid the royal family's embarrassment at her having a child by a Muslim. The intelligence services in France, Britain and the USA have stonewalled though we know that intelligence services had Diana under surveillance on the fateful night in Paris. And, there has been a concerted campaign to discredit any attempts to get at the truth.

PHOTO TAKEN MINUTES BEFORE THE CRASH: WALKING TO HER DEATHEvery trick in the book, every tabloid technique known to man, has been employed to fashion a fiction that parades as the truth. Henri Paul was not drunk at all. Both Trevor Jones and Kez Wingfield continue to insist that Paul gave no indication whatsoever of being drunk before he got behind the wheel. They had been with him for extended periods that evening and still maintain that there was nothing in his behaviour or general conduct to suggest that he had been drinking. If this is the case, how then do they account for the inquiry finding that, within three minutes of leaving the hotel, he was more than three times over the drink-drive limit?
After three contradictory autopsies, Henri Paul was buried on the advice of his lawyers, and not cremated, as they advised his body may have to be exhumed again. The Times published an article headlined "Spy agencies listened in on Diana". In this article, "former intelligence officials" confirmed to the newspaper that spy agencies in Britain and America "eavesdropped on Diana". Given that Diana was mother to the future King, and was often at odds with the Royal Family, it is frankly unbelievable that the security forces were taking no interest in her? but the official line attempts to deny the obvious.

According to Stephen Dorril's published history of Britain's overseas intelligence service, "MI6: Fifty Years of Special Operations" (p788): "... the late Princess of Wales had clearly been under some kind of surveillance, as evidenced by the 1,050-page dossier held by the US National Security Agency detailing private telephone conversations between Diana and American friends intercepted at MI6's request ". The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA) have confirmed that they hold 39 documents consisting of 1,056 pages of information relating to Diana and Dodi Al Fayed, but they refuse to reveal it on the grounds of national security.

LAST PHOTO: DIANA RECIEVING OXYGEN AFTER THE CRASHNear the end of her life, Diana was increasingly becoming involved in politics, and rattling a few cages on the way. She had criticized her own government and their policies. There were many in high places who resented her increasing involvement with politics, and her popularity. She was also viewed as a potential loose cannon, and could reveal dark secrets of the Royal family, and more. All of this, along with her her relationship with Dodi Fayed, sealed her fate.
The same forces behind the murder of so many others, from a head of state such as JFK, to an ordinary civilian who knew too much, like Chandra Levy, were behind the murder of Princess Diana. MI6, the NSA, the CIA, The Bilderbergers, Trilateral Commission, CFR, Bohemian Grove, and other related secret agencies and societies that control the politics and media of supposedly "free" nations all fall under the same umbrella, and employ the same tactics.

Despite the lies put out as truth in the popular press, many people believe Diana was murdered. But you will never hear the truth of what really happened to her in the mainstream media, any more than you will about the others who have been done away with at the hands of these murderous criminals. In the end, it's up to the people to decide if they can accept the truth about what kind of people control their own governments. And if they can accept the truth about what really happened to Diana, and so many others like her.


Well how can be royals could be investigated? Right?
Dont you try to be , the spokesman of royals ? right?
Even libral british tabloids , voiced thier concerns ?
Sorry you are not living in a perfect world!

On bail, dumb! Which means the case is still there, it has not been dropped. Police is investigating, it can bring him back or lay charges.

Isnt that enough of a humiliation that person whom you MQM guys think is god, had to go to jail even if briefly and on charges of corruption. You always maintained that MQM is not corrupt. Well its leader is being investigated for money laundering.

What case?
There is just a investigations, there is no case?
If there is a case I guss, there wasnt be any bail?
So yes whatever , he is there prosecution doesnt have it?
We should move forward?
Even though we both dont like it?
But let the truth prevails? Shall we ?

What happened in Diana case? Al Fayed claimed that his son (Dodi al Fayed) and Lady Diana must have been killed but he was not able to prove anything. It was apparently a natural accident. Now if someone claims otherwise he has to prove it in the court of law. Mohammad Al Fayed failed to do that... so what can I say about it.

Conspiracy theories can be hatched about anybody but it is not a miracle if a true accident would have taken place.

Cospiracies are part of our lives , & you do need to learn a lot?