Al yarabiyah : Iraqi army kills 40 ISIS terrorists in Fallujah

[Doritos11]

http://english.alarabiya.net/en/New...-army-kills-40-ISIS-fighters-in-Fallujah.html

The Iraqi armed forces, working with tribal fighters in Anbar province killed 40 fighters from the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), destroyed weapons and seized four ISIS headquarters in the city of Fallujah this week.

According to a statement by the Iraqi Defense Ministry, the 39th Brigade of the Iraqi army, reinforced by the Iraqi air force, took part in the operation.

Al Arabiya News Channel’s correspondent reported on Friday that the Iraqi air force had targeted ISIS fighters in the city of Ramadi, in Anbar.

Sources speaking to the correspondent stated that the fighters had fled earlier from the al-Bofaraj area of Anbar, where security forces had launched an operation on Wednesday.

On Wednesday, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki announced that his country refuses to arm “terrorists” in Syria, while Iraqi forces managed to regain control of some of the areas that were seized by ISIS fighters in Anbar province to the west of Baghdad.

Since December 2013, Iraqi forces, along with the police and tribal forces, have been battling to regain control over areas in Anbar, which shares a 300 kilometer border with Syria.

Parts of Ramadi and Fallujah have been held by militants for weeks, harkening back to the years after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion when both cities in Anbar province were insurgent strongholds.

 

[Yzd Khalifa]

About freaking time the army flexing their muscles. Good job, let's hope the 10-year-old civil war drops once and for all.

 

[Doritos11]

About freaking time the army flexing their muscles. Good job, let's hope the 10-year-old civil war drops once and for all.

civil war was ignited by ISI ;2006-2008,
this is war on ISIS.

 

[VeeraBahadur]

Keep killing those scums.

 

[Doritos11]

 

[Yzd Khalifa]

civil war was ignited by ISI ;2006-2008,
this is war on ISIS.

Not true.

The unrest took place right after the US-led invasion. It started in Southern Iraq, north eastern Baghdad, as well as the outskirts and the shrines in the city of Najaf.

By December 2003, the Shia resistance in Najaf accepted cease fire agreement in condition that the holy shrines shall be left unharmed, while the other faction of Shia resistance elsewhere as well as the Sunni radical resistance, and the Baathist resistance kept on fighting until 2007 at a time Al-Zarqawi was killed by an airstrike.

The situation got relatively mild from 2007 till 2009, wherein the monsters of Al-Qaida were released from Assad's prisons in Syria. The vast majority of these people went to Iraq to continue the fight up to this moment.

In conclusion, neither the occupying powers or the interim Gov't could have stopped these people. I don't accept that much from the current regime in Iraq tbqh. This is what happens when a weak Gov't smiles back at the terrorists - regardless of their ideological beliefs -

 

[Doritos11]

Not true.

The unrest took place right after the US-led invasion. It started in Southern Iraq, north eastern Baghdad, as well as the outskirts and the shrines in the city of Najaf.

By December 2003, the Shia resistance in Najaf accepted cease fire agreement in condition that the holy shrines shall be left unharmed, while the other faction of Shia resistance elsewhere as well as the Sunni radical resistance, and the Baathist resistance kept on fighting until 2007 at a time Al-Zarqawi was killed by an airstrike.

The situation got relatively mild from 2007 till 2009, wherein the monsters of Al-Qaida were released from Assad's prisons in Syria. The vast majority of these people went to Iraq to continue the fight up to this moment.

In conclusion, neither the occupying powers or the interim Gov't could have stopped these people. I don't accept that much from the current regime in Iraq tbqh. This is what happens when a weak Gov't smiles back at the terrorists - regardless of their ideological beliefs -

Army acts weak because everyone in the region is dieing making false propaganda portraying the army as bloodthirsty to kill innocent people.
They have no choice but to act wise and slowely/steadily.

Heres an example, a family houses a ISIL terrorist pick up yet complains and cries when the hellfire missile falls on it, retards everywhere.

 

[SALMAN F]

Army acts weak because everyone in the region is dieing making false propaganda portraying the army as bloodthirsty to kill innocent people.
They have no choice but to act wise and slowely/steadily.

Heres an example, a family houses a ISIL terrorist pick up yet complains and cries when the hellfire missile falls on it, retards everywhere.

They all should be killed with their families

 

[Shah9]

But what happens if they control Syria and their new presence in Tripoli (Lebanon)?

It looks like ****-Afgh borders = soon in Syria-Iraq borders I believe, not full control of sovereign in Syria otherwise for Iraq.

 

[Yzd Khalifa]

Let's have a healthy debate on that, shall we?

Army acts weak because everyone in the region is dieing making false propaganda portraying the army as bloodthirsty to kill innocent people.

That doesn't make any sense at all. Such excuse, if you excuse me for saying it, is pathetic.

When someone puts a bomb into your house, you should put two. Yet at the same time, you must differentiate between targeting militias, and expelling a massive amount of civilians, which is taking place in Iraq these days.

I have looked into the local MSM response to the campaign, I saw multiple news channels coming with different response, takes, and analysis on that.

Al-Jazeera had drawn a severe criticism to these operation, they did conduct several interviews with heads of Sadrist movement, most of which are anti-Al-Maliki for one reason or another. Whereas the Al-Arabiya had been a slightly critical, they did conduct multiple interviews with Heads of The Sahwa movements of whom are supporting the action taken in this.

Surprisingly however, the most severe reactions to this conflict came from two Iraqi-owned News Agencies, Iraq's Al-Hurra, and Al-Tagheer. Basically, they are accusing the Gov't of purging civilians, getting rid off their political enemies, and try to cover up the dark side of the regime.

If you want to crack down on militants, you should take all sides down, the Sunnis, the Shias, and The Kurds. No one has the right to pick up their arms and fight except the Gov't. A guy like Abu-Baker Al-Baghdadi and Wathiq Al-Battat should never set a single foot free.

Heres an example, a family houses a ISIL terrorist pick up yet complains and cries when the hellfire missile falls on it, retards everywhere.

This has nothing to do with the MSM, and the kind of the job they're doing.

Army acts weak because everyone in the region is dieing making false propaganda portraying the army as bloodthirsty to kill innocent people.
They have no choice but to act wise and slowely/steadily.

Heres an example, a family houses a ISIL terrorist pick up yet complains and cries when the hellfire missile falls on it, retards everywhere.

They all should be killed with their families

Nothing of a surprise. This is how moral and humane the average Mullah-supporting Iranians are.

 

[SALMAN F]

Let's have a healthy debate on that, shall we?



That doesn't make any sense at all. Such excuse, if you excuse me for saying it, is pathetic.

When someone puts a bomb into your house, you should put two. Yet at the same time, you must differentiate between targeting militias, and expelling a massive amount of civilians, which is taking place in Iraq these days.

I have looked into the local MSM response to the campaign, I saw multiple news channels coming with different response, takes, and analysis on that.

Al-Jazeera had drawn a severe criticism to these operation, they did conduct several interviews with heads of Sadrist movement, most of which are anti-Al-Maliki for one reason or another. Whereas the Al-Arabiya had been a slightly critical, they did conduct multiple interviews with Heads of The Sahwa movements of whom are supporting the action taken in this.

Surprisingly however, the most severe reactions to this conflict came from two Iraqi-owned News Agencies, Iraq's Al-Hurra, and Al-Tagheer. Basically, they are accusing the Gov't of purging civilians, getting rid off their political enemies, and try to cover up the dark side of the regime.

If you want to crack down on militants, you should take all sides down, the Sunnis, the Shias, and The Kurds. No one has the right to pick up their arms and fight except the Gov't. A guy like Abu-Baker Al-Baghdadi and Wathiq Al-Battat should never set a single foot free.



This has nothing to do with the MSM, and the kind of the job they're doing.






Nothing of a surprise. This is how moral and humane the average Mullah-supporting Iranians are.[/quotey