What's new

AGM-88E demonstrates new ‘anti-ship’ capability

AMDR

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 28, 2014
Messages
1,109
Reaction score
16
Country
United States
Location
United States

CPlwXRBWwAAMovz1.png

A AGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM) successfully hit a Mobile Ship Target during Block 1 upgrade test firings at the Point Mugu Sea Range on Aug. 18. The AARGM shot was launched from a U.S. Navy F/A-18F Super Hornet in a scenario designed to test the missile’s capabilities against mobile ship targets employing advanced tactics.

News Room

Orbital ATK's AARGM Missile Scores Direct Hit Against Mobile Ship Target
Live Fire Test Demonstrates Program’s Block 1 Upgrade Capability


Dulles, Virginia, 23 September 2015 -- Orbital ATK, Inc. (NYSE: OA), a global leader in aerospace and defense technologies, and the U.S. Navy successfully launched and scored a hit against the Mobile Ship Target during Block 1 upgrade test firings of the AGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM) at the Point Mugu Sea Range on Aug. 18, 2015.

“The block upgrade testing demonstrated that the hardware, software and aircraft systems all worked together resulting in the successful live fire of the weapon,” said Bill Kasting, Vice President and General Manager of Orbital ATK’s Defense Electronic Systems division of the Defense System’s Group. “We look forward to rolling out these upgrades throughout the fleet, upon the successful completion of follow-on operational testing.”

“This first Block 1 live fire test demonstrated the weapon’s effectiveness against a moving ship,” said Gordon Turner, Vice President Strike Weapons. “This is the first live-fire test in a series of live-fire and captive-carry events that will assess the missile’s software modifications made to deliver new capabilities to the warfighter.”

The AARGM shot was launched from a U.S. Navy F/A-18F Super Hornet in a scenario designed to test the missile’s capabilities against mobile ship targets employing advanced tactics. The AARGM utilized its advanced anti-radiation homing sensor and millimeter wave radar to successfully detect, identify, locate and engage the moving maritime target.

Orbital ATK participated in the missile firing as a member of the U.S. Navy's Integrated Product Team, led by the Direct and Time Sensitive Strike Program Office. Team members from the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division - China Lake led the AARGM Block 1 Upgrade test. Additional test team members included Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division – Point Mugu, Air Test and Evaluation Squadron Three One, and the Naval Air Systems Command.

AARGM is a supersonic, air-launched tactical missile system, upgrading legacy AGM-88 HARM systems with advanced capability to perform Destruction of Enemy Air Defense missions. AARGM provides the most advanced system for pilots, with in-cockpit, real-time electronic order of battle situational awareness against today’s modern surface-to-air threats. It is able to rapidly engage traditional and non-traditional advanced land- and sea-based air-defense threats, as well as striking, time-sensitive targets.

AARGM is currently deployed with the U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps. AARGM achieved Initial Operational Capability in July 2012 and was approved by the Navy for Full Rate Production in September 2012.

AARGM is a U.S. Navy and Italian Air Force international cooperative major acquisition program with the U.S. Navy as the executive agent. AARGM is currently deployed and supporting operational requirements for the U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps. The missile is integrated into the weapons system on the F/A-18C/D Hornet, FA-18E/F Super Hornet and E/A-18G Growler aircraft. AARGM is anticipated to achieve Initial Operational Capability on the Italian Air Force’s Tornado ECR aircraft in 2017.
 
nice. if it can pin-point hit the tower that houses the captain/crew, AESA radar and communications that would kill a ship without actually sinking it
Absolutely.
Mach 2 with a 100-something pound warhead is definitely gonna be bad day lol

Supposedly they are developing an AARGM-ER variant with a ramjet that will double the range of the current 88E as well as increase the overall speed by a nice bit too. Most importantly, it will be able to fit inside the internal bay of the F-35A/C unlike the current HARM variants. General IOC in 2022, which would point to F-35 integration when Block 4 comes out in 2023-2024.


Which is a solid advantage for us, because if their SAMs can't detect, track, and kill an F-35 at atleast 140 miles (good luck doing that) their IADS is in some very serious trouble.
 
nice. if it can pin-point hit the tower that houses the captain/crew, AESA radar and communications that would kill a ship without actually sinking it.

Designed for survivability, the Burke class incorporates all-steel construction and many damage control features that are a direct result of lessons learned during the 1981 Falkland Islands War, and from the May 1987 accidental attack on the USS Stark (FFG 31)in the Persian Gulf. Two layers of steel and 70 tons of Kevlar armor protect the ship's vital areas. The design also incorporates anti-chemical/biological warfare double air-locked hatches, anti-contaminant interior pressurization, and reduced access to weather-decks. Fire-fighting measures include larger foam tanks with quicker access, salt-water sprinklers in the berthing areas, and fresh-water sprinklers in CIC areas.
http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/docs/ArleighB.htm

Also, it's why the CIC is located below the main deck
ddg_111-detail_1.jpg


AGM-88 Warhead weight 66 kilograms (146 lb)

As compared to
ESSM SAM: 39 kg blast fragmentation warhead,
SM-2MR SAM: 62 kg continuous rod warhead.
Penguin AShM: 120-130 kg semi-armor piercing warhead
NSM AShM: 125 kg multi-purpose blast/fragmentation warhead
Harpoon AShM: 221 kg penetrating blast-fragmentation warhead
LRASM-A AShM: 450 kg blast-fragmentation penetrator
 
http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/docs/ArleighB.htm

Also, it's why the CIC is located below the main deck
ddg_111-detail_1.jpg


AGM-88 Warhead weight 66 kilograms (146 lb)

As compared to
ESSM SAM: 39 kg blast fragmentation warhead,
SM-2MR SAM: 62 kg continuous rod warhead.
Penguin AShM: 120-130 kg semi-armor piercing warhead
NSM AShM: 125 kg multi-purpose blast/fragmentation warhead
Harpoon AShM: 221 kg penetrating blast-fragmentation warhead
LRASM-A AShM: 450 kg blast-fragmentation penetrator


j9vbtd.png


is this area armored? if you take out the AESA array, and communications then CIC would be pointless (blind and deaf) dead in the water.
 
j9vbtd.png


is this area armored? if you take out the AESA array, and communications then CIC would be pointless (blind and deaf) dead in the water.
I couldn't tell you where the Kevlar is. I can tell you that unlike many other modern ships (which also use aluminium and composite materials in their superstructure), these ships are entirely steel. I would expect the four panels to be compartmentalized in many ways so that it would be difficult for a hit to take out all four panels in one go. I'm sure AEGIS could function with 3 or 2 or 1 panel in operation. Also, USN ships have Cooperative Engagement Capability, which essentiall allows ships to network their sensors and increase situational awareness that way. So, even with some or alll of the 4 panels out of action, the ship could still 'see' by using radar data received from other ships. Some subsystems may also provide data (Phalanx for example has its own search and track radars). Also, consider that ships like these are expected to also be able to function under EMCON condition i.e. radar silence: there are other means to detect and track targets than turning your radar 'searchlight' on. So, I doubt you could easily fully blind it.
ddg-51-passive.gif

CIWS_Radar.jpg

DDG72Antennas.jpg~original
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom