What's new

Afghan refugees vow to stay put

Janbaz

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
1,305
Reaction score
0
By M Ilyas Khan
BBC News, Peshawar

Mohammad Khalid, 20, has registered himself as an Afghan national with the Pakistani authorities. And this has landed him in a dilemma.

The process of registration came after Pakistan declared that all Afghan refugees must return to their homes in three years' time.
But for Mr Khalid, home is the Katchagarhi refugee camp on the western outskirts of Peshawar, the capital of Pakistan's North West Frontier Province (NWFP).

"I was born and raised here. I don't have any other home to go to," he says.
Naseerullah Sargardan, 22, shares this dilemma. "It is mind-boggling to be told that the place where you spent your childhood is not your home," he says.

Legal limbo

The problem is typical of a very large segment of the refugee population in Pakistan, says an official of the Pakistani refugee agency, the Commissionerate of Afghan Refugees (Car).
"More than half of the 2.2 million refugees who have registered... so far were either born here or migrated at a very young age," he says.

Most of them have never set foot inside Afghanistan, and have lost their fathers and other close relatives in the decade-long war against the invading Soviet troops in Afghanistan during the 1980s. "They have nothing to go back to in Afghanistan, and would stay on in Pakistan if given a choice," he says. But choice is what these young men don't have. For one, the refugees in Pakistan have no legal status, and therefore no protection against arbitrary acts of government. "This is because Pakistan is not a signatory to various international conventions and protocols on refugees, and there is no national legislation on the issue," explains Afrasiab Khattak, a lawyer and human rights activist.

Secondly, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) appears to have resigned itself to the Pakistani policy of "forced" repatriation of refugees as opposed to its own policy of "voluntary" repatriation. "The Pakistani people have hosted the refugees for more than 25 years, and we are now ready to assist the Pakistani government in its decision to repatriate them over the next three years," says Rabia Ali, a UNHCR spokesperson in Peshawar.

Fading interest

The decision is causing unrest among the larger refugee community whose leaders are now running from pillar to post to make themselves heard. "When the Russians invaded Afghanistan, Pakistan and the international community offered us attractive incentives to leave our homes and come to Pakistan. And we did," says Malik Azeem, an elder at the Jalozai refugee camp near Peshawar. Apart from hefty daily cash allowances for each family, the international community offered the refugees full kitchen sets, an exhaustive range of edible items, clothing and generous gifts on festive occasions.

The wisdom of this policy was obvious.

The refugee camps were "places to which the mujahideen (guerrillas) could return for rest and to see their families", writes Brig Mohammad Yousaf, the man who headed the Afghan desk of Pakistan's intelligence agency during the 1980s.

In his book, The Bear Trap, he also describes the camps as "a huge reservoir of potential recruits for jihad". International interest started to fade after the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan in 1988, and by the mid-1990s most assistance to schools and dispensaries had been phased out.

The Car, too, gave up maintenance of water supplies and other infrastructure in refugee camps by 2002. In March 2006, it further stopped assistance to the remaining schools in the camps, leaving the refugee community to run them out of their own resources.

Business bonds

The latest Pakistani strategy is to close some 119 refugee camps in NWFP one by one, starting with two major camps near Peshawar, namely Katchagarhi and Jalozai. The refugees there have been asked to clear out by mid-2007. This poses a serious problem for Mohammad Khalid, who can either take his 20-member family to his ancestral village in a lawless part of Laghman province, or go to a makeshift refugee shelter in Kabul.

The choice before Naseerullah Sargardan and numerous other heads of families who are second-generation refugees is equally daunting.

But the older generation of refugees is no less concerned, and is inclined to resist in case pressure is applied against them.

"We have told the Car officials and visitors from the UNHCR that our people have an estimated 800m rupees ($13m) invested in business in Peshawar. It is impossible to pull out this money in such short time," says Haji Noor Rahman, a community elder at Katchagarhi.

Lifelong home

Another line of argument focuses on the humanitarian aspect of their plight. "Forcing us into a region which is still torn by war and lawlessness, where women and children are not safe, amounts to the gravest violation of human rights I can imagine," says Abdul Hakim Khan, another Katchagarhi elder.

Despite government pressure, many observers believe that in the end a sizeable refugee population will stay on in Pakistan for good. "It took them 27 years to build this village. They have their graves here, their children go to schools and colleges. They cannot just get up and walk away from here," says a Car official based in Jalozai camp. There may be some hope in this for second-generation refugees who have nothing left in Afghanistan.

BBC News.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6509895.stm
 
I think those of Pashtun origin and no hostile feelings to pakistan can stay here if willing. Given that their police records are clear and support no illegal activity plus earn living in an honourable manner. There will be i think no problems as long as this criteria is met!:)
 
Surge in number of Afghans returing home from Pakistan- UN
Written by pub
Wednesday, 04 April 2007

UNITED NATIONS, Apr 3 (APP) - The U.N. refugee agency says it has opened an extra repatriation centre in Pakistan’s North West Frontier Province to handle the larger than expected number of Afghans wanting help to return home ahead of a deadline later this month.

UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) spokesperson Ron Redmond told reporters in Geneva Tuesday that 58,956 people were repatriated last month with the agency’s help, and many more are arriving every day at its Pakistani facilities, according to a press statement issued at UN Headquarters in New York.

Redmond said that each of the two repatriation centres in NWFP can process up to 10,000 returning Afghans every day, and a separate centre in Balochistan can deal with about 1,500 people.

The numbers have been swelling ahead of the 15 April deadline, after which Pakistani authorities have said that all Afghans who did not take part in an earlier registration exercise or who have not agreed to return home with UNHCR assistance will be deemed to be illegal immigrants.

UNHCR gives assistance of about $100 per person to Afghans when they reach home after they have provided proof that they were residing in Pakistan around the time of the 2005 census of Afghans living in that country.

Redmond said a high number of bogus returnees were clogging up the repatriation process to try to receive the return assistance package, prompting UNHCR officials to conduct thorough interviews, physical verification and fingerprint biometrics to prevent abuse.

Voluntary repatriation for those Afghans who have already registered and received proof of registration cards which grants the bearer temporary protection in Pakistan until the end of 2009 will begin after 15 April.

http://www.app.com.pk/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=7160&Itemid=2
 
what about the Pakistanis who are living in camps? The ones who sided with Pak instead of Bangladesh, why are they still living in slums with no nationality, We don't care about these people who sacrificed their future for Pakistan; but we are accepting people who brought AK47's, Alqeda & Heroin into our country.
 
Well said rehman bhai totally agreed, we must send till the last afghani is on our soil, they can visit us the legal way, but no more refugee status, we pakistanis are pissed off by them specially localities living in Peshawar and Quetta, they brought us the gifts of AK47, HEROINE, PROSTITUTION, these days most of the problems are due to the afghan refugees, but even after pampering them for more then 20 years they are not loyal to our home land, always cursing Pakis, i can write more then a book on this issue because i have seen them very closely i spent 3 years at afghanistan, we must now set the rules of engagment, now or never, it is already too late
 
what about the Pakistanis who are living in camps? The ones who sided with Pak instead of Bangladesh, why are they still living in slums with no nationality, We don't care about these people who sacrificed their future for Pakistan,

I regard this more Important than anything why are these PAKISTANIS left out they are blood.
 
I think it is wrong to expel those people that were BORN in Pakistan. Isn't everyone born on Pakistani soil automatically a Pakistani? Nonethless, its good to read that finally the massive numbers of refugees that have lived in Pakistan for so long are now returning home. The government should insure that all true refugees are sent back home eventually.
 
Childern of "Refugees" do not make the nationals of country where they are sheltered under UN rules and Pakistani law both.

We are already a over populated state and if these refugees stay in Pakistan, they would travle frequently to Afghanistan and no one would be able to stop drugs and guns trade.
 
We are already a over populated state and if these refugees stay in Pakistan, they would travle frequently to Afghanistan and no one would be able to stop drugs and guns trade.

What makes you think that stopping the refugees traveling into Afghanistan will stop drugs and guns trade to any extent? The point is an irrelevant excuse.
 
The Afgan refugees have lived in Pakistan for so long they should be allowed Pakistani citizenship.
 
According to the LAW refugees can't be granted citizenship.

True, but their kids can be if they were born in Pakistan, hence the parents would most likely stay in Pakistan and be granted Pakistani citizenship like after the USSR/Afghan war.
 
Who issue is too damn politicised internationaly, the clear picture would come after next few months.

If USA want to pull out, we would need these Afghans to be home to have a batter control over Afghan politics.
 
Its not BATTER but Better

bet·ter 1(btr)
adj. Comparative of good.
1. Greater in excellence or higher in quality.
2. More useful, suitable, or desirable: found a better way to go; a suit with a better fit than that one.
3. More highly skilled or adept: I am better at math than English.
4. Greater or larger: argued for the better part of an hour.
5. More advantageous or favorable; improved: a better chance of success.
6. Healthier or more fit than before: The patient is better today.


http://www.thefreedictionary.com/better
 
Who issue is too damn politicised internationaly, the clear picture would come after next few months.

If USA want to pull out, we would need these Afghans to be home to have a batter control over Afghan politics.

USA is not going to pullout. :D

As long as Al-Qaeda network is running, they are likely not to leave. It goes against their policy. The whole OIL thing would be a loss. (On a note, Halliburton has left Iran. :) )

What the Afghans need to do is to leave Pakistan if they will in the future and support the politics in Afghanistan the way they like to.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom