AgNoStiC MuSliM
ADVISORS
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 25,259
- Reaction score
- 87
- Country
- Location
Secret killing program is key in Iraq, Woodward says
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The dramatic drop in violence in Iraq is due in large part to a secret program the U.S. military has used to kill terrorists, according to a new book by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Bob Woodward.
Bob Woodward on Larry King Live
Bob Woodward's book, "The War Within: Secret White House History 2006-2008," came out Monday.
The program -- which Woodward compares to the World War II era Manhattan Project that developed the atomic bomb -- must remain secret for now or it would "get people killed," Woodward said Monday on CNN's Larry King Live.
"It is a wonderful example of American ingenuity solving a problem in war, as we often have," Woodward said.
In "The War Within: Secret White House History 2006-2008," Woodward disclosed the existence of secret operational capabilities developed by the military to locate, target and kill leaders of al Qaeda in Iraq and other insurgent leaders.
National security adviser Stephen Hadley, in a written statement reacting to Woodward's book, acknowledged the new strategy. Yet he disputed Woodward's conclusion that the "surge" of 30,000 U.S. troops into Iraq was not the primary reason for the decline in violent attacks.
"It was the surge that provided more resources and a security context to support newly developed techniques and operations," Hadley wrote.
Woodward, associate editor of the Washington Post, wrote that along with the surge and the new covert tactics, two other factors helped reduce the violence.Video Watch Bob Woodward explain the strategy »
One was the decision of militant cleric Muqtada al-Sadr to order a cease-fire by his Mehdi Army. The other was the "Anbar Awakening" movement that saw Sunni tribes aligning with U.S. troops to battle al Qaeda in Iraq.
Don't Miss
Woodward told Larry King that while there is a debate over how much credit the new secret operations should get for the drop in violence, he concluded it "accounts for a good portion."
"I would somewhat compare it to the Manhattan Project in World War II," he said "It's a ski slope right down in a matter of months, cutting the violence in half. This isn't going to happen with the bunch of joint security stations or the surge."
The top secret operations, he said, will "some day in history ... be described to people's amazement."
While he would not reveal the details, Woodward said the terrorists who have been targeted were already aware of the capabilities.
"The enemy has a heads up because they've been getting wiped out and a lot of them have been killed," he said. "It's not news to them.
"If you were a member of al Qaeda or the resistance or some extremist militia, you would be wise to get your rear end out of town," Woodward said. "It is very dangerous."
Secret killing program is key in Iraq, Woodward says - CNN.com
-------------------------------------
Of course the part in bold might actually be the reason for the surge in foreign militants in FATA and Afghanistan ...
Could this be implemented in Afghanistan and FATA?
Woodward seems to think so.
Could this mean that the recent air strikes which, bar one, seem to have been quite successful are an application of that program, and did this figure into the discussions between the top brass of the US and Pakistani Mil. on board the carrier?
My curiosity is peaked in terms of how the program functions. There is a reference to people getting killed if the program does not remain secret, so that would imply (if it wasn't misdirection) that there is a strong human element involved in this process.
Special forces infiltrating into known insurgent infested areas for reconnaissance and targeting over extended periods of time? Possible part of the program, but thats hardly anything earth shatteringly new.
Infiltrating the militant groups themselves would imply extensive use of Iraqis, and would explain the need for secrecy, but that too isn't a new concept. A combination of the above with technology ...???
Your thoughts and opinions?