What's new

A Breakdown in Transporting Supplies to Afghanistan

Consider the alternative routes and how much more it would cost. The route through Pakistan is at a fraction of the price.

I'm not talking about the cost of transport alone. I'm talking about the War on Terror collectively, because the transport of goods is a part of that war. Everything has to be taken into the equation.

If you think otherwise, please do enlighten me...
 
.
My friends dad is involved in this NATO supply business. He's a multi-billionaire.
 
.
12 Dec 2008

The West is indirectly funding the insurgency in Afghanistan thanks to a system of payoffs to Taleban commanders who charge protection money to allow convoys of military supplies to reach Nato bases in the south of the country.

Contracts to supply British bases and those of other Western forces with fuel, supplies and equipment are held by multinational companies.

However, the business of moving supplies from the Pakistani port of Karachi to British, US and other military contingents in the country is largely subcontracted to local trucking companies. These must run the gauntlet of the increasingly dangerous roads south of Kabul in convoys protected by hired gunmen from Afghan security companies.

The Times has learnt that it is in the outsourcing of convoys that payoffs amounting to millions of pounds, including money from British taxpayers, are given to the Taleban.

The controversial payments were confirmed by several fuel importers, trucking and security company owners. None wanted to be identified because of the risk to their business and their lives. “We estimate that approximately 25 per cent of the money we pay for security to get the fuel in goes into the pockets of the Taleban,” said one fuel importer.

Another boss, whose company is subcontracted to supply to Western military bases, said that as much as a quarter of the value of a lorry's cargo went in paying Taleban commanders.

The scale of the supplies needed to keep the Nato military operation going is vast. The main British base at Camp Bastion in Helmand province alone requires more than a million litres of diesel and aviation fuel a week. There are more than 70,000 foreign soldiers in the country for whom food and equipment must be imported, mostly by road. The US is planning to send at least 20,000 more troops into Afghanistan next year.

Other than flying in supplies, the only overland route is through Pakistan and Taleban-controlled areas of Afghanistan.

A security company owner explained that a vast array of security companies competed for the trade along the main route south of Kabul, some of it commercial traffic and some supplying Western bases, usually charging about $1,000 (£665) a lorry. Convoys are typically of 40-50 lorries but sometimes up to 100.

Asked whether his company paid money to Taleban commanders not to attack them, he said: “Everyone is hungry, everyone needs to eat. They are attacking the convoys because they have no jobs. They easily take money not to attack.” He said that until about 14 months ago, security companies had been able to protect convoys without paying. But since then, the attacks had become too severe not to pay groups controlling the route. Attacks on the Kandahar road have been an almost daily occurrence this year. On June 24 a 50-truck convoy of supplies was destroyed. Seven drivers were beheaded by the roadside. The situation now was so extreme that a rival company, working south of the city of Ghazni, had Taleban fighters to escort their convoys.

“I won't name the company, but they are from the Panjshir Valley [in north Afghanistan]. But they have a very good relation with the Taleban. The Taleban come and move with the convoy. They sit in the front vehicle of the convoy to ensure security,” said the company chief.

The Taleban are not the only ones making money from the trade; warlords, thieves, policemen and government officials are also taking a cut.

A transport company owner who runs convoys south on the notoriously dangerous Kabul to Kandahar highway said: “We pay taxes to both thieves and the Taleban to get our trucks through Ghazni province and there are several ways of paying. This goes to a very high level in the Afghan Government.

“Mostly the [Afghan] security companies have middlemen to negotiate the passage of the convoys, so they don't get attacked. They pay on a convoy by convoy basis to let the convoy pass at a certain time. They have to pay each of the Taleban commanders who control each part of the road. When you hear of an attack it is usually because a new small [Taleban] group has arrived on the road.”

Lieutenant-Commander James Gater, a spokesman for Nato forces in Afghanistan, said that the transport of Nato supplies was contracted to commercial firms and how they got them into the country was their business.

“I can confirm that we use two European-headquartered companies to supply food and fuel, though for contractual reasons it is not prudent for us to name them. They provide their own security as part of that contract. Such companies are free to subcontract to whomsoever they wish.

“We are aware they do prefer to subcontract from the countries in which they are operating. In Pakistan they prefer to use Pakistani trucking companies, in Afghanistan they prefer Afghan trucking companies. That is a commercial decision for them.”

A representative for the Swiss-based Supreme Global Solutions confirmed that the company held supply contracts with the military in Afghanistan.

However, last night the company denied paying protection money. “We categorically reject any suggestion that we now, or have ever, paid money to any individual for the safe passage of our convoys. Furthermore, we do not permit our subcontractors to do so on our behalf,” it said.
 
. . .
What? The pure army of jehad is accepting bribe money?

Yes, you can say it bribe money, I would prefer to call it "terror tax".

Taliban have not only taxed money but are killing them with weapons they are purchasing with their money.
 
. .
Shouldn't you be worried that your Northern Alliance buddies aren't getting any? ;)

Northern Alliance would be definitely paying Taliban as well.

I wonder what so called "construction workers" would be paying them to let them breath ? :cheesy:
 
Last edited:
. .
ASIA PACIFIC
Date Posted: 11-Dec-2008

Jane's Defence Weekly

Taliban attack NATO supply lines

Trefor Moss JDW Asia-Pacific Editor - London

Key Points
The Taliban have targeted NATO supply vehicles in a string of attacks in Peshawar aimed at disrupting operations in Afghanistan

NATO is seeking to conclude talks with Asian and East European nations aimed at opening up alternative supply lines


Militants have targeted NATO supply lines between Pakistan and Afghanistan in three separate attacks that resulted in the destruction of around 250 vehicles.

The militants attacked a series of supply depots on the outskirts of Peshawar between 1 and 8 December, striking at what is the main staging post for NATO convoys heading out of Pakistan through the Khyber Pass and on to Kabul, the Afghan capital. Around 70 per cent of NATO's Afghan traffic is currently routed through Peshawar, while up to 90 per cent travels through Pakistan after landing in the southern port of Karachi.

Around 100 militants are thought to have carried out the largest of the three attacks on 7 December, in which around 70 Humvees and 100 flat-bed trucks were set on fire. Three local security guards at the Al Faisal terminal were also killed in the attack.

NATO played down the importance of the Taliban raids, with a spokesperson for the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan describing them as "militarily insignificant" in light of the enormous volume of supplies that the force continually receives.

However, the attacks not only offered proof of the precarious security situation in Peshawar - the capital of Northwest Frontier Province in which the Pakistani military has been battling insurgents throughout 2008 - but also underlined the urgency with which NATO needs to secure alternative overland lines of communication.

The alliance announced a deal in April enabling the supply of non-lethal goods by land from Russia. However, the route has still not opened because negotiations with other countries that would need to be party to the agreement - including Belarus, Turkmenistan and Ukraine - have yet to conclude.

Jane's understands these to be at an advanced stage but the increasing pressure being placed on the Khyber line of communication - something that NATO acknowledges to be of serious concern - will only encourage the allies to seek a hasty conclusion to the negotiations.

© 2009 Jane's Information Group
 
. .
In order to use route other than Pakistan NATO will have to throw Georgia to the wolves, and stop its expansion drive in Ukraine, and give up the so called anti missile THAAD shield in Poland and Hungary!.

This talk of "alternate route" is just a notional thing, capitalizing on the stupidity of us Pakistanis.

US / NATO wants to fight the war on the cheap in Afghanistan. This is why their supply routes are in danger. Pakistan should stop playing "Abdullah Deewana" and task US / NATO to pay the right price; or else go to hell.

No to free "War on Terror", no to free CHAWKIDARI by 125,000 troops, No to free role of Coolies and Informers
 
.
Based on the first hand accounts of truckers actually moving the goods; there is no way the US / NATO troops in Afghanistan can be supplied without investing protection money.

The beneficiaries of this multi-million dollar spinoff includes the Taleban, NA commanders (in particular Hazrat Ali), US Logistics officials, Dubai based Prime contractors, Pakistan Govt officials, FC officials.

Problems like burning of vehicles occurs when the purse string holders play stingy or become overly greedy. Such spinoff money has lots of BARAKAH once shared in the right proportions.
 
.
13 Dec 2008

Nato plans to open a new supply route to Afghanistan through Russia and Central Asia in the next eight weeks following a spate of attacks on its main lifeline through Pakistan this year, Nato and Russian sources have told The Times.

Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, the former Soviet Central Asian states that lie between Russia and Afghanistan, have agreed in principle to the railway route and are working out the small print with Nato, the sources said.

“It'll be weeks rather than months,” said one Nato official. “Two months max.”

The “Northern Corridor” is expected to be discussed at an informal meeting next week between Dmitri Rogozin, Russia's ambassador to Nato, and Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, Nato's Secretary-General.

The breakthrough reflects Nato and US commanders' growing concern about the attacks on their main supply line, which runs from the Pakistani port of Karachi via the Khyber Pass to Kabul and brings in 70 per cent of their supplies. The rest is either driven from Karachi via the border town of Chaman to southern Afghanistan - the Taleban's heartland - or flown in at enormous expense in transport planes that are in short supply.

“We're all increasingly concerned,” Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters on Wednesday. “But in that concern, we've worked pretty hard to develop options.”

The opening of the Northern Corridor also mirrors a gradual thaw in relations between Moscow and Nato, which plunged to their lowest level since the end of the Cold War after Russia's brief war with Georgia in August.

However, Nato and the United States are simultaneously in talks on opening a third supply route through the secretive Central Asian state of Turkmenistan to prevent Russia from gaining a stranglehold on supplies to Afghanistan, the sources said. Non-lethal supplies, including fuel, would be shipped across the Black Sea to Georgia, driven to neighbouring Azerbaijan, shipped across the Caspian Sea to Turkmenistan and then driven to the Afghan border.

The week-long journey along this “central route” would be longer and more expensive than those through Pakistan or Russia and would leave supplies vulnerable to political volatility in the Caucasus and Turkmenistan.

The US and Nato are, though, exploring as many alternatives as possible as America prepares to deploy 20,000 more troops - three quarters of them by the summer - to add to the 67,000 foreign troops in Afghanistan. Turkmenistan represents the only realistic alternative that bypasses Russia. A route through Iran is out of the question because Washington does not have diplomatic relations with Tehran. Afghanistan's border with China is too remote to be used.

An agreement with Georgia has already been signed and negotiations with Azerbaijan are “ongoing”, a Nato official said.

Nato began exploring alternative supply routes in response to political instability in Pakistan last year and reached an informal agreement with Russia on the Northern Corridor at a Nato summit in Bucharest in April. At the same meeting President Berdymukhammedov of Turkmenistan offered to allow Nato to take supplies across its territory and to establish logistics bases there, according to Nato sources.

Negotiations stalled after the Georgian crisis, as Nato suspended high-level contacts with Moscow and Central Asian countries grew wary of angering the former Soviet master.

They have since shown their independence by refusing to back Moscow's recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent states.

Russia, meanwhile, has been offering preferential treatment to Nato members that it considers “friendly”, such as France and Germany, the only Nato members allowed to fly supplies to Afghanistan through Russian airspace. In November Germany also became the first Nato member allowed to bring supplies for Afghanistan through Russia by railway.

Russian officials say that Moscow is ready to open the Northern Corridor to all Nato members as soon as the alliance finalises its agreements with Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. The agreements cover non-military supplies such as fuel, food and clothing, and some non-lethal military equipment.

“All Nato countries will be able to use the Northern Corridor,” one Russian official familiar with the negotiations told The Times. “As far as we understand, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan have agreed to it and sent the relevant papers to Brussels. We're just waiting for Nato to sign the agreements. We've done our part.”

BORDER WOES

A spate of attacks by Pakistani militants on supply convoys to Nato and US forces has caused backlogs and border closures (Jeremy Page writes). More than 1,000 trucks are stalled on the Afghan border and haulage costs are up by almost 70 per cent.Pakistani authorities have closed the border at Torkham, near the Khyber Pass, after militants set fire to at least 260 vehicles, including American Humvees, last weekend and attacked two cargo terminals in Peshawar on Thursday.
 
.
What the hell do they Think they will be safe there, Taliban will soon attack their convoys even from there. Just wait and see.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom