What's new

910 Terrorists killed, 82 Pakistani Soldiers martyred in Op Zarb-e-Azb so far.

Good for you ... You are free to "think" whatever you like ... The progress is before you.. Not a single terrorist attack since the operation started ... Number of terrorist fuks caught in urban cities n so on.



His posts n threads are indeed borderline ...
i never said the operation wasn't successful, it has disrupted terrorist activity i think the army has exaggerated the number of casualties they've inflicted. they haven't given names of the the militants they've killed. if there worried about showing photos get journalists to go to the morgues where the bodies are kept to varify the deaths, and btw the leadership who ran from the area will eventually regroup, what the pak army has done is disrupt activities for a few months. the leadership is still there and those bastards will likely start attacks they'll move there base of operation else where.
 
i never said the operation wasn't successful, it has disrupted terrorist activity i think the army has exaggerated the number of casualties they've inflicted. they haven't given names of the the militants they've killed. if there worried about showing photos get journalists to go to the morgues where the bodies are kept to varify the deaths, and btw the leadership who ran from the area will eventually regroup, what the pak army has done is disrupt activities for a few months. the leadership is still there and those bastards will likely start attacks they'll move there base of operation else where.


The bodies aren't even sent to "morgues" ..and I'm not sure if anybody is interested in knowing the id of dead terrorists .. But commanders are mostly named ..
 
the problem will idiots on this forum is that there too guilable and belive whatever bullshit ISPR say
The bodies aren't even sent to "morgues" ..
where are dead bodies kept for identification then. the same fantasy world where most pdf members are living in.
 
the problem will idiots on this forum is that there too guilable and belive whatever bullshit ISPR say

where are dead bodies kept for identification then. the same fantasy world where most pdf members are living in.

They are buried like trash ... A militant who dies in a gun battle doesn't need proper identification either... The local commanders are already identified though..... The captured ones need it though..

And getting personal only makes you look bad .. Not the other way around..
 
They are buried like trash ... A militant who dies in a gun battle doesn't need proper identification either... The local commanders are already identified though..... The captured ones need it though..

And getting personal only makes you look bad .. Not the other way around..
so how are there death recorded, if a body isn't properly identified. you need identification to confirm a death. people aren't randomly buried like a video game you need death certificates etc. a body which hasn't been identified stays in a place called a morgue (if you obviously don't understand the concept of a morgue).what about Names of those individuals killed why hasn't the army provided names of the people they've killed. allot of media outlets have questioned the authenticity of the armies claims. things that ispr report about this conflict seem inconsistent. when you look at all the reports about the militant casualties all neutral sources claim that the army's claims couldn't be independently verified. so don't be so naive and falsely believe the army actually killed 910 militants when no independent source can verify there claims.
 
so how are there death recorded, if a body isn't properly identified. you need identification to confirm a death. people aren't randomly buried like a video game you need death certificates etc. a body which hasn't been identified stays in a place called a morgue (if you obviously don't understand the concept of a morgue).what about Names of those individuals killed why hasn't the army provided names of the people they've killed. allot of media outlets have questioned the authenticity of the armies claims. things that ispr report about this conflict seem inconsistent. when you look at all the reports about the militant casualties all neutral sources claim that the army's claims couldn't be independently verified. so don't be so naive and falsely believe the army actually killed 910 militants when no independent source can verify there claims.


Unfortunately poor Pak army doesn't have the luxury of identifying each and every militant killed in a gunbattle ... Issue death certificates n build morgues in tribal areas ... As for the fake dead militant casualties yes sure .. That's how the evil military makes us fools.. Only to be busted by a kid on a forum..poor us ..

But I'm sure you would be more than willing to go to the troubled areas where the fighting is going on and identify n verify the numbers.. May the force be with you.
 
Unfortunately poor Pak army doesn't have the luxury of identifying each and every militant killed in a gunbattle ... Issue death certificates n build morgues in tribal areas ... As for the fake dead militant casualties yes sure .. That's how the evil military makes us fools.. Only to be busted by a kid on a forum..poor us ..
answer me this question? If the indian army launched a major operation in IOK and made sure that no media could visit the area of operation and the indian military press gave reports of killing scores of mujhaideen, without giving the names, identity or showing a single body of a slain mujahid, and then after 2 months claimed they had killed over 1000 mujahids and lost 3 dozen soldiers wouldn't you consider that rather suspicious? only when this concept applies to the Pak army you buy ISPR bullshit.
its not my fault you're too much of an illetrate to believe in false propaganda.
 
answer me this question? If the indian army launched a major operation in IOK and made sure that no media could visit the area of operation and the indian military press gave reports of killing scores of mujhaideen, without giving the names, identity or showing a single body of a slain mujahid, and then after 2 months claimed they had killed over 1000 mujahids and lost 3 dozen soldiers wouldn't you consider that rather suspicious? only when this concept applies to the Pak army you buy ISPR bullshit.
its not my fault you're too much of an illetrate to believe in false propaganda.

Does US army show bodies of dead militants killed in Afghanistan ?

Does india even allow media in IOK ?

Anyways .. Whatever makes you happy buddy..

thrilainmanila

Enjoying your posts by the way.

TC
 
Does US army show bodies of dead militants killed in Afghanistan ?

Does india even allow media in IOK ?

Anyways .. Whatever makes you happy buddy..

thrilainmanila

Enjoying your posts by the way.

TC
you still haven't answered my question?
there is independent media which confirms the deaths of both soldiers and enemy in both IOK and Afganistan, the media is allowed to verify deaths in both these locations, i dislike the indian army but even they show the bodies of the mujahids they kill there media even blew the lid on fake allegations of fake encounters that took place in kashmir/kargil among indian soldier. You honestly believe if US army or ISAF concealed an operation in a similar fashion to the pak army they'd get away with it? ever heard of wikileaks.
the thing you need to understand is that the pak army has a tight lid on all news channels, the moment something is reported which is contrary to the army's narrative however factual it is the news station is raided aka geo.
 
Military operation is going on with great success but the sad part is no big dog killed in Zarb e Azb.
 
the thing you need to understand is that the pak army has a tight lid on all news channels, the moment something is reported which is contrary to the army's narrative however factual it is the news station is raided aka geo.
happened already when TTP disputed the army's claim saying only 25 to 30 fighters died and blamed army for killing civilians,

army will avoid graphic evidence because it has been used by the terrorists as a propaganda tool
they even used the pictures of Army training as a propaganda of army's brutality
 
happened already when TTP disputed the army's claim saying only 25 to 30 fighters died and blamed army for killing civilians,

army will avoid graphic evidence because it has been used by the terrorists as a propaganda tool
they even used the pictures of Army training as a propaganda of army's brutality

Is it fair to say that the TTP is better at propaganda and therefore able to project itself to its target audience better compared to the Army? ISPR clearly needs to do a better job.
 
Does US army show bodies of dead militants killed in Afghanistan ?

Does india even allow media in IOK ?
(Indian/ US) public perception and reactions are different

they do show the pictures (bin laden being exception) but only because public dont see the terrorists and public of that part of the world as their own so they dont expect any criticism
Indian public sees all Muslim Kashmiris as traitors
American public sees all Afghans and Arabs as subhuman so they praise and enjoy the pictures

here we have different problem. public see Pakistan army fighting "own people" on the direction of Americans

Is it fair to say that the TTP is better at propaganda and therefore able to project itself to its target audience better compared to the Army? ISPR clearly needs to do a better job.
TTP hands down wins by big margin..
even the west fails to compete with TTP's regional and international brothers when it comes to powerful propaganda of AQ, ISIS etc
 
Last edited:
Inna lillahi wa inna ilayhi rajeeoon...Rest in Peace sons of the soil :(


To talibans: Go answer the Lord you were dying to see :angry:
 
TTP hands down wins by big margin..
even the west fails to compete with TTP's regional and international brothers when it comes to powerful propaganda of AQ, ISIS etc

And that is precisely the problem. The Army may win FATA on the ground for a while, but losing this larger propaganda war will mean more problems in the long run over a much larger area.
 
Back
Top Bottom