SalarHaqq
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
- Messages
- 4,569
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
The US regime:
* Failed Iraq by messing up its military and rendering it incapable of stopping "I"SIS. It was the US, not Iran which had trained the Iraqi military. A US-trained army not even capable of standing its ground against a rag-tag terrorist grouplet, in the face of which it faltered. This was in line with the systematic dismantling and weakening of Iraqi institutions under the direction of the US-appointed viceroy Paul Bremer, who was in charge of implementing the occupational agenda of the American regime, defined by its zionist neoconservatives.
* Took ages to deliver weaponry requested by Baghdad.
* Stood on the sidelines and did not bat an eyelid as "I"SIS were invading a huge portion of Iraq. And it was perfectly normal, since "I"SIS's strings in essence are pulled by NATO and the zionists. The goal was to disrupt the Iranian-led Axis of Resistance, foment sectarian strife in the Muslim world and destabilize and balkanize West Asian nation-states.
A declassified memo of the American regime's "Defense Intelligence Agency" (DEA) openly predicted the emergence of a "salafist emirate" in the region and did not view this as a threat to US interests.
___
Pentagon Report Predicted West’s Support for Islamist Rebels Would Create ISIS
By Nafeez Ahmed, INSURGE intelligence Published May 26, 2015https://truthout.org/articles/penta...upport-for-islamist-rebels-would-create-isis/
How the west created the Islamic State
Nafeez Ahmed
Sep 11, 2014
___
The western and zionist strategy to rely mostly on pseudo-jihadist terrorists as a weapon of choice against the Resistance Axis was conceived in the first decade of the 21st century, parallel to Hezbollah's victory over Isra"el" during the latter's 2006 aggression of Lebanon. Pulitzer Prize winner Seymour Hersh composed a remarkable paper in which he revealed the machination, citingsources in the US regime's security apparatus.
___
The Redirection
Is the Administration’s new policy benefitting our enemies in the war on terrorism?By Seymour M. Hersh
February 25, 2007
The Redirection
Is the Administration’s new policy benefitting our enemies in the war on terrorism?
* Enter grand ayatollah Sistani's fatwa, mass mobilization of Iraqis from all linguistic and religious communities (Shia Muslims, Sunnis Muslims, Christians, Yazidis, Shabak etc) under the unifying umbrella of the PMU with Iranian assistance. The zio-American plan was jeopardized, "I"SIS stopped in its tracks and then pushed back. That's the moment Washington suddenly had a change of heart and considered it necessary to jump in to occupy a terrain which otherwise would have been liberated by Iraqis themselves with the help of Islamic Iran.
Evidently, had the PMU taken over the rest of Iraq they and political factions supporting them would have been regarded as the sole liberators by every person and would have overshadowed every political rival, especially those subservient to the US regime.
What's absurd is the notion that Washington and Tel Aviv, whose intelligence services manufactured "I"SIS and threw it at the people of the region in the first place, didn't see their hand forced by the Resistance but were genuinely interested in fighting this savage assortment of patsies and useful idiots who were perfectly serving the zio-American agenda. Informed observers are well aware of the nation-wrecking agenda pursued by the US and zionist regimes in West Asia and North Africa since September 11, 2001.
Last edited:
?! 
