What's new

3 percent GDP share urged for Indian armed forces

Adux

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
3,856
Reaction score
0
3 percent GDP share urged for Indian armed forces
By Iftikhar Gilani

NEW DELHI: A parliamentary standing committee headed by a Congress MP here has decried the declining defence share in the government budget and the finance ministry slashing funds to the armed forces.

Asserting that three per cent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) should be reserved for defence services every year to ensure a fixed amount for carrying out modernisation, acquisitions, research and fulfilment of the need-based requirements, the committee pointed out that the defence share in the budget has fallen compared to previous years and many earlier years standing at 14.11 percent in 2007-08 while its share of the GDP has also continuously declined to be 2.07 per cent now.

In a report tabled in the Lok Sabha on Saturday by its chairman, Balasaheb Vikhe Patil, the committee rejected the Finance Ministry’s plea of the unresolved debate on the “guns versus butter choice”, a political choice, for not linking defence budget with GDP and justifying the defence expenditure as percentage of GDP continuously falling from 2.50 per cent in 1991-92 to 2.07 per cent in 2007-08.

A Finance Ministry representative had sought to argue before the committee that “in a country like India which has a large segments of disadvantaged, not included in the growth process as the GDP grows, a larger amount should be allocated to the welfare of those people rather than spending it more on arms and ammunition.”

Referring to the Finance Ministry’s plea that the defence budget is decided keeping in view “overall resource position of the government and also various compelling needs of different sectors,” the committee felt that the defence sector needs a different treatment as it strongly recommended that the government must allocate the amount as projected by the Defence services to avoid resource crunch in defence acquisitions and modernisation since otherwise it would adversely affect the country’s defence preparedness.

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default...-4-2007_pg4_22
 
. .
2.07, are you friggin serious? With our level of threats, we should be friggin spending 4%.
 
. .
It should be 15%.

My favorite Flame Bait provider......lol

I would love it be 15%, that is if I had 1.2 billion billionaires..Sadly I dont...lol nor am I from a Commie country...

but back on topic, 2.07% is quite low...
 
.
3% should be a minumum level. More should be provided incase needed.

Acquisition laws NEED to be changed thus allowing for faster acquisitions. The amount of time it takes now is simply pathetic.
 
.
3% should be a minumum level. More should be provided incase needed.

Acquisition laws NEED to be changed thus allowing for faster acquisitions. The amount of time it takes now is simply pathetic.
 
.
I dont know how feasible it is to keep a % as a target. it should be a yard stick to measure how affordable it is, but not definitly a level that we shud follow.
 
.
Most countries spend average 3% on Defence, India should too. Can anybody tell me what amount is being spent on retirement pensions, does it come directly under defence expenditure or private sector like China.
Thanks!
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom