What's new

3 Kurdish rebels killed in southeast Turkey

Jigs

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
3,735
Reaction score
0
3 Kurdish rebels killed in southeast Turkey: military
23:27, December 29, 2010

Turkish military said that three members of the outlawed Kurdish Workers' Party (PKK) were killed in an operation in southeast Turkey.

The military said in a statement that the three PKK militants were affiliated to a group which killed a specialist sergeant in Dargecit town of Mardin province two weeks ago.

A flash drive and official documents belonging to the sergeant on terrorists were found in the operation, said the military.

The PKK, listed as a terrorist organization by the Turkish government, the United States and the European Union, took up arms in 1984 in order to create an ethnic homeland in southeastern Turkey.

Some 40,000 people have been killed in conflicts involving the PKK in the past over two decades.

Source: Xinhua
 
With Israeli military training and US resources, Turkiye will be presented a Trojan horse - so long as the leadership remains intact, Turkiye will face a threat wielded by Israel and the US - the piece below is from a interview granted to NYT among other WESTERN newspapers :




December 31, 2010
A Kurdish Rebel Softens His Tone for Skeptical Ears
By STEVEN LEE MYERS

QANDIL, Iraq

HIGH in the craggy mountains of Iraq’s northern frontier, where men (and, in this case, women) with guns have long operated beyond the control of any government, Murat Karayilan sounds more interested in pursuing peace than the war he has led against Turkey.

“We are not weak,” Mr. Karayilan said in an interview in this village, where he and other fighters of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or the P.K.K., represent the law of the land, despite official claims to the contrary.

“Our youths are always ready, hot-blooded and combative, but we want the Kurdish problem — as a nation’s problem, as a people’s problem — to be solved not by guns, but by dialogue

Many will doubt Mr. Karayilan’s sincerity, especially in Turkey. The party’s violent struggle has lasted more than a quarter-century and cost 40,000 lives. But now, perhaps more than ever before, there are indications that the war may have reached its endgame.

And that has put Mr. Karayilan — either a noble insurgent fighting oppression or a narco-terrorist commander — at the center of a different kind of offensive.

He has been making the case for Kurdish rights in Turkey in surreptitiously arranged, if not exactly clandestine, interviews from his mountainous redoubt, irritating officials on both sides of the border who would rather see him fade into obscurity.

“The Kurdish people are an ancient people in the world,” he said. “All their national and linguistic rights have been denied. Our goal is to achieve those rights

Mr. Karayilan’s party, long designated a terrorist organization and since last year a drug trafficker by the United States, has declared a new cease-fire and already extended it into the new year. Whether by design or under duress, the party has reduced its own political demands, tempered by the profound political and economic changes that have swept Turkey and Iraq.

Mr. Karayilan no longer calls for a separate Kurdish state, but for a degree of autonomy within Turkey that is inspired by, but stops considerably short of, the federal system the Kurds set up for themselves in Iraq after the American invasion in 2003.


Iraq’s Kurdish leaders, eager to expand trade and cross-border cooperation, have supported efforts to end the fighting, offering their own model of self-determination and rising prosperity as an example. Even as officials in Turkey rule out negotiations with the party itself, intermediaries have held secret talks to discuss the possibility of a lasting peace, according to officials in Iraq and Turkey.

The presence of the P.K.K. has long been an irritant in relations, prompting cross-border raids and bombings as recently as last summer. Increasingly, though, it would seem to be a surmountable one.

“We continue to remind all: Violence will not be the way to solve this issue,” said Barham Salih, the prime minister of the Kurdish regional government in northern Iraq.

Iraq’s Kurds are “mindful of our relationship with Turkey,” Mr. Salih added. The experience of the Kurds within Iraq’s democratizing if not yet fully democratic system “dispels the notion that the Kurds are a destabilizing element in this part of the world,” he said.

“We don’t have to be stuck in the conflicts in the past,” he said.

MR. KARAYILAN is a garrulous man, portly but fit, mustachioed and nattily dressed in the handmade olive-gray uniform that the party’s fighters wear. His past is murky enough that the United States Treasury Department’s official terrorist designations give two birth dates for him, making him either 56 or 60.

He has been the day-to-day commander of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party since its charismatic founder, Abdullah Ocalan, was captured in 1999, tried and sent to an island prison in the Sea of Marmara.

The leadership moved to Qandil shortly afterward, and its fighters live more or less openly in what amounts to an undeclared haven. Its fighters — a large number of them women — adhere to a disciplined, ascetic lifestyle. While they have always used the mountains as refuge, the toppling of Saddam Hussein has made this much easier — to the chagrin of the Turkish government, which routinely complains to the United States and Iraq to do more to curtail the P.K.K.’s movements.

“For the first time in history, the Kurds have breathing space
,” said the movement’s spokesman, Roj Welat.

Mr. Karayilan’s exact base is, of course, kept secret, but the party’s presence in the gorges around Qandil is not. Uniformed fighters maintain a checkpoint on the road from the Kurdish regional capital, Erbil, not far beyond the last official checkpoint.

The party’s flag flutters over its territory, while Mr. Ocalan’s portrait hangs ubiquitously. Mr. Ocalan remains the movement’s revered leader, but he “is not in a position to giver orders” from prison, as Mr. Karayilan put it, though his messages and writings are still circulated.

The party runs a clinic with a German doctor and a factory to make the uniforms. It neatly tends a cemetery with a 30-foot white obelisk that looms over the graves of Kurdish fighters from Iraq, Turkey, Iran and Syria.

Mr. Karayilan said donations from Kurds in their homeland or abroad sustained the movement. American and Turkish officials say smuggling does. As for weapons, Mr. Karayilan smiled coyly when asked. “You can get whatever you want,” he said. “It’s the Middle East.”

The party unilaterally declared a cease-fire after an eruption in cross-border violence from 2007 to 2009. The lull has largely coincided with concessions from the Turkish government under Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan to expand rights for the country’s Kurdish minority by, for example, allowing a Kurdish-language television station and Kurdish-language studies at universities.

Mr. Erdogan’s government has ignored the party’s announced terms for an end to violence altogether, including the release of arrested Kurdish political activists and the creation of a reconciliation commission like the one in post-apartheid South Africa. Instead the government has struck a more nationalistic tone before elections in June. Nevertheless, the government is expected to offer some new gestures for Kurds in hopes of marginalizing Mr. Karayilan’s group.

“Some of the things listed as preconditions are already part of the democratic standards by our government for all of our citizens, not only for Kurds,” said Omer Celik, a member of Parliament and one of Mr. Erdogan’s leading political advisers.

Mr. Karayilan said the Turkish government lacked the political will to pursue a true peace, though, tellingly, he did not close the door on a negotiated resolution.

He spoke for nearly two hours in a cinder-block house here in Qandil, not far from another house badly damaged by two Turkish bombs in the summer.

He traveled with only a small retinue of guards in Toyota Land Cruisers and took few other precautions. When the interview ended, he apologized for not being able to stay for dinner.

For all his polite charm, he remains strident at times, denouncing what he called Turkish occupation, oppression and genocide. But the outline of an accommodation that he sketches no longer seems so far-fetched.

He urged the United States, as well as other nations, to stop seeing the conflict through the prism of the “war on terror,” but rather through that of self-determination. “It is the cause of a nation that needs to be addressed,” he said.


Stephen Farrell and Namo Abdulla contributed reporting from Qandil, Iraq, and Sebnem Arsu from Istanbul.
 
We dont negotiate with terrorists. If they want to bring it to politics they can join the BDP which is our Kurdish party. Right now though they are trying to bring the Kurdish language into politics and that is simply not possible.
 
Dear Turk brother Salam!

I hope you will not mind my questions but I am unable to understand why.......

1- Kurdish people are not allowed to use their language?
2-Why Turkey. Syria and Iran are reluctant to give Kurd people their due rights?
3-Why Turkey calls them terrorists which involve even (mostly) women and children? It shows the state of utter desperation.
4-They have been struggling

I am sorry to say that Turkey is hushing up a somehow a struggle for basic rights. And it makes them one of first category countries who are involved in violating basic human rights by crushing rights struggles (e.g. US, Israel, Iran and India while in second cat (denying freedom of expression and faith) Saudi Arabia, Russia, China, Pakistan etc.
 
Thanks for your questions

1- Kurdish people are not allowed to use their language?

To the first one. All people in Turkey can speak any language they want. The issue being addressed about the Language is that Kurds(Mainly the BDP which is a Kurdish political party) are trying to have Kurdish allowed in the Turkish Parliament and that is simply not possible as our national language is the only language that can be spoken here and other governmental institutions. This doesn't just go for Kurdish but it applies to all languages. (Unless your obviously the head of another state that comes to address it and not a actual party in the Turkish Political system)

2-Why Turkey. Syria and Iran are reluctant to give Kurd people their due rights?

To the second question i can not speak for other countries but Kurds born in Turkey are Turkish citizens and receive the same rights we do.


3-Why Turkey calls them terrorists which involve even (mostly) women and children? It shows the state of utter desperation.

The terrorists we refer to are the PKK who have been staging rebellion for a establishment of a Kurdish state in Turkey,Iraq(which they achieved after the U.S. invasion) Syria and Iran. These are sovereign states it is not possible to seek a state with in them.


4-They have been struggling

Who the PKK ? I am sure they have and they will only keep dieing. They are of course free to put down their guns and come out of their caves to live in Turkey. If they seek war against the state though they will be killed.

As far as the Kurds themselves struggling that is proportionate to the areas within Turkey. The southeastern Turkey is far less modern and more poor(which is where more Kurds reside) then the West side which sees more development.
 
Dear Turk brother Salam!

I hope you will not mind my questions but I am unable to understand why.......

1- Kurdish people are not allowed to use their language?
2-Why Turkey. Syria and Iran are reluctant to give Kurd people their due rights?
3-Why Turkey calls them terrorists which involve even (mostly) women and children? It shows the state of utter desperation.
4-They have been struggling

I am sorry to say that Turkey is hushing up a somehow a struggle for basic rights. And it makes them one of first category countries who are involved in violating basic human rights by crushing rights struggles (e.g. US, Israel, Iran and India while in second cat (denying freedom of expression and faith) Saudi Arabia, Russia, China, Pakistan etc.

1-Because the next wawe will be the country that kurds wish.If you give them more right,They'll want more and more.Just think that way

2-We're reluctant because we know what'll happen in the future if we give them more rights.

3-Why call them terorrists?Maybe because of assasination attacks,Bombs and propogandas.

You are right about the last one we crush some human rights.But when we gave them the rights at the past they just wanted more an more.Kurds are greedy creatures, they don't deserve anything

P.S : Pardon me if my comment is out of logic.It's near 4am.
 
Dear Turk brother Salam!

I hope you will not mind my questions but I am unable to understand why.......

1- Kurdish people are not allowed to use their language?
2-Why Turkey. Syria and Iran are reluctant to give Kurd people their due rights?
3-Why Turkey calls them terrorists which involve even (mostly) women and children? It shows the state of utter desperation.
4-They have been struggling

I am sorry to say that Turkey is hushing up a somehow a struggle for basic rights. And it makes them one of first category countries who are involved in violating basic human rights by crushing rights struggles (e.g. US, Israel, Iran and India while in second cat (denying freedom of expression and faith) Saudi Arabia, Russia, China, Pakistan etc.
Let me correct distorted facts of yours;
1) Kurds and others allowed to speak Kurdish anywhere.
2) When you have a terrorist organization like PKK for over 30 years demanded separation of a region from the country, you have to give some credit to those who resist to do so.
3) It doesn't involve children. And those who go to mountains and join the PKK, well, gender doesn't make a difference as long as they kill civilians and military personnel does it?
4) Struggle is a strong word for someone who seem to know less than what it appears to be. You didn't even know Kurdish wasn't banned.
 
1- Kurdish people are not allowed to use their language?
2-Why Turkey. Syria and Iran are reluctant to give Kurd people their due rights?
3-Why Turkey calls them terrorists which involve even (mostly) women and children? It shows the state of utter desperation.
4-They have been struggling.

dear nasq,
your questions are very well answered above, believe me there is no reason to sympathize them.. rule is clear, be a good boy then you can have dinner with family.
 
They are not rebels ... They are TERRORISTS !!!
 
kurds have more rights that original turks in turkey.half of the kurdish population has green card.its mean they dont pay for hospital spending plus medicine.as for me i am now jobless and government doesnt provide me free health care and medicine.plus every month i must pay for water,electric,telefon,internet etc.in the same moment kurds doesnt pay.turkish government is feeding around 15 miliion people.ive never heard in my life that a country give such rights to a minority.even police doesnt nab them however they nab the turks easily.

so its very very noncense to talk about kurdish rights.i think we must talk about turkish rights.we ve been minority in our own country.government must pay money to me as she did to kurds.
 
when will muslims stop killing other muslims and understand kaafir conspiracies??

im also embarrassed by my pak army killings

we are sleeping on kashmir, palestine, chechniya, ughyr, afghanistan, sudan, somalia issues
 
when will muslims stop killing other muslims and understand kaafir conspiracies??

Huh ? These are nationalists trying to form their own country in Turkey. They use terrorism and bombings on civilians to do it. Religion has zero play in this conflict.

im also embarrassed by my pak army killings

we are sleeping on kashmir, palestine, chechniya, ughyr, afghanistan, sudan, somalia issues

Kurdish issue is far more important to us then any of those. 40,000 people are dead because of it.
 
Back
Top Bottom