10 evidence of Qatar's support for the top five terrorist organizations in the world

[The SC]

Flashback "Qatar Israel Iran"
​

Before presenting Qatar's relationship with the top five terrorist organizations in the world, we must take back what Tamim said: "Qatar has succeeded in building strong relations with America and Iran at the same time, given Iran's regional and Islamic weight that can not be ignored. With it, especially as it is a major force to ensure stability in the region when cooperating with it, which is keen on Qatar for the stability of neighboring countries "

"We would like to contribute to the achievement of a just peace between Hamas, the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people and Israel, because of the continuous contact with the parties, Qatar has no enemies because of its flexible policy."

Qatar supports a DAESH
​

In a controversial statement, Qatari Foreign Minister Mohammed bin Abdul Rahman al-Thani said last February that DAESH could not be described as a "source of terrorism" in the world.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange revealed last November in an interview with the Russian channel today, that Hillary Clinton's letters revealed the funding of Qatar and other countries of DAESH, and Clinton officially admitted in one of her letters leaked from her mail that Qatar supports DAESH.

A report by the DW website also revealed that Qatar is the largest incubator for an online syndicate of DAESH through Twitter, while Belgium is the primary European.

Qatar and the Nusra front .. This is what we want from you
​

The British writer Robert Fisk last May accused Qatar of having a proven relationship with the organization of the Nosserist terrorist front. He said in his article in the Independent last year: "There is no doubt that there is a relationship between Qatar and the Fascist Front." Fisk cited the meeting of Al Jazeera with the leader of the organization Abu Mohammed Al -Julani.

The former Qatari Foreign Minister Khaled bin Mohammed al-Attiyah told Arab TV in 2015 that his country wished the "Nusra front" to distance itself from al-Qaeda, in reference to the need to separate it from the parent organization.

Qatar and Al Qaeda
​

According to US magazine "Foreign Policy" in March, the US Treasury Department monitored Qatari funding in September 2014 for al-Qaeda through a Qatari businessman who gave $2 million bonus to a DAESH suicide bombers.

According to the magazine in its report, high-ranking US officials have revealed Qatar's tolerance with al-Qaeda militants, and stressed that some of the citizens of Qatar funding al-Qaeda and the Nusra Front and described the position of Qatar as contradictory, it supports al-Qaeda and hosts US military bases on its territory.

In a report in 2013, the Washington Post reported the involvement of renowned Qatari academic Abdulrahman al-Nuaimi in supporting al-Qaeda in the name of charitable financing, and as the newspaper's described him as the main financier of all terrorist organizations in the Middle East.

In December 2014, the New York Times criticized Qatar as the first sponsor of terrorism in the region, and as evidence it cited the Qatari al-Jazeera channel support of The activities of Sheikh Hajjaj Ajami and his brother Shafi Ajamii, describing them as agents for terrorist groups.

Qatar and MB: According to Sarmadi
​

The Qatari prime minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani has acknowledged Qatar's support for the Brotherhood on the grounds that they are elected by the Egyptian people. In an interview with the BBC in May 2014, Qatar also supported the Brotherhood in the rest of the Arab countries for the same reason that they came at the will of their people.
While "The New York Times" in December 2014 has criticized Qatar's support for the Brotherhood.

Qatar's Foreign Minister Mohammed bin Abdul Rahman al-Thani said Saturday (November 26th) that his country would continue to arm the Syrian opposition even if Trump stopped US support.

Qatar and supporting terrorism in Syria
​

The statement by the current Qatari foreign minister, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani in February, and the denial of DAESH export of terrorism to the world was not the first of its kind. According to "Reuters": On November 26, he said that his country would continue to arm the Syrian opposition even if Trump stopped US support.

"This support will continue, and we will not stop it, and that does not mean that if Aleppo falls, we will abandon the demands of the Syrian people," the Qatari foreign minister said at the time. "..." Qatar will not be the only one to leave Syria, and offers the opposition shoulder missiles to defend itself against Syrian and Russian warplanes.


http://www.dotmsr.com/details/79998...-تثبت-دعم-قطر-لأكبر-5-تنظيمات-إرهابية-بالعالم

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

Some one exactily trying to justify the way india is defending kalboshan and their consulates in Afg.

 

[Russell]

*yawn*

Oh no Qatar are the new whipping boys.

Pathetic.

I honesty can't wait for the day the US decides the House of Saud and the 'kingdom' are surplus to needs and turns on them.

InshaAllah this will happen in my lifetime.

 

[pin gu]

there is no question about Qatar supporting terrorism as Syria said in 2012 ( sorry cant post links )

telegraph :Syria-Assad-regime-blames-Saudi-Arabia-and-Qatar-for-bomb-attacks

The Syrian regime on Sunday blamed rebel groups working with Saudi Arabia and Qatar for a string of weekend bomb attacks in Damascus and Aleppo that killed 29 people.

the question is why now all of the sudden they treat Qatar like half way partner ( رفیق نیمه راه )

 

[Inspector Spacetime]

there is no question about Qatar supporting terrorism as Syria said in 2012 ( sorry cant post links )

telegraph :Syria-Assad-regime-blames-Saudi-Arabia-and-Qatar-for-bomb-attacks

The Syrian regime on Sunday blamed rebel groups working with Saudi Arabia and Qatar for a string of weekend bomb attacks in Damascus and Aleppo that killed 29 people.

the question is why now all of the sudden they treat Qatar like half way partner ( رفیق نیمه راه )

Assad can blame anyone he wants, no one takes that guy serious anyway.

 

[raptor22]

there is no question about Qatar supporting terrorism as Syria said in 2012 ( sorry cant post links )

telegraph :Syria-Assad-regime-blames-Saudi-Arabia-and-Qatar-for-bomb-attacks

The Syrian regime on Sunday blamed rebel groups working with Saudi Arabia and Qatar for a string of weekend bomb attacks in Damascus and Aleppo that killed 29 people.

the question is why now all of the sudden they treat Qatar like half way partner ( رفیق نیمه راه )

There is 3 prominent and major types of governing system and school of thoughts which are backbones of governments in the region:
1: Muslim Brotherhood which are represented by Turkey , Qatar and Egypt (Morsi) block ..
2: Islamic republic which is represented by Iran since revolution.
3: Monarchy Wahhabism which is represented by Saudis and UAEs ..

As you've seen these 3 have tried to extend their influence throughout of the region by having regimes sharing same mindset ... the first one and second one offer people democracy and election while the third one no , the reason why the third group are against two first ones is this , that's why they supported Saddam against us (imagine what would have happened if people of southern parts of Persian gulf wanted to revolt against dictators like Iranians , womething that happened back in 2011 in Bahrain and Yemen and have been cracked down since then) That's why Turkey supports Qatar and was supporting Morsi and that's why Saudis supported coup against Morsi .. though other reasons are involvled too ..

Assad can blame anyone he wants, no one takes that guy serious anyway.

Many didn't take him serious whom are no longer in the power ...

 

[The SC]

There is 3 prominent and major types of governing system and school of thoughts which are backbones of governments in the region:
1: Muslim Brotherhood which are represented by Turkey , Qatar and Egypt (Morsi) block ..
2: Islamic republic which is represented by Iran since revolution.
3: Monarchy Wahhabism which is represented by Saudis and UAEs ..

As you've seen these 3 have tried to extend their influence throughout of the region by having regimes sharing same mindset ... the first one and second one offer people democracy and election while the third one no , the reason why the third group are against two first ones is this , that's why they supported Saddam against us (imagine what would have happened if people of southern parts of Persian gulf wanted to revolt against dictators like Iranians , womething that happened back in 2011 in Bahrain and Yemen and have been cracked down since then) That's why Turkey supports Qatar and was supporting Morsi and that's why Saudis supported coup against Morsi .. though other reasons are involvled too ..


Many didn't take him serious whom are no longer in the power ...

Well you are right on the 3 points.. but there is more to it:
- Egypt was stagnating in all aspects of life, which called for some dynamics to change that.. Egypt was also governed by the military since the overthrow of king Farouk..and had democracy established.. the MB had no clue of international relations or politics..in their first year they had jeopardised Egypt's economy and politics..
- Iran was governed by the Shah who had his family and some close friends live well, while most of Iranian people (the majority) lived in poverty.. this called for a revolution to establish democracy..
- Saudi Arabia had nothing like the previous two, so it means that it is stable.. and no one like to change stable and efficient governments..

 

[HAIDER]

Soon we ll hear Qatar was responsible for 911. .... dirty laundry in Qatar beg.

 

[raptor22]

Well you are right on the 3 points.. but there is more to it:
- Egypt was stagnating in all aspects of life, which called for some dynamics to change that.. Egypt was also governed by the military since the overthrow of king Farouk..and had democracy established.. the MB had no clue of international relations or politics..in their first year they had jeopardised Egypt's economy and politics..
- Iran was governed by the Shah who had his family and some close friends live well, while most of Iranian people (the majority) lived in poverty.. this called for a revolution to establish democracy..
- Saudi Arabia had nothing like the previous two, so it means that it is stable.. and no one like to change stable and efficient governments..

-In Egypt en elected government was overthrown through military coup not people other excuses like economy and politics to justify it is not acceptable.

-In many countries people live in poverty , why we do not see revolution there? Iranian quest for democracy and independence has a long history from Constitutional Revolution back in 1903 (Russian bombed the parliament) to nationalization of oil industry back in 1953 (Military coup by MI6 and CIA) to The demonstrations of June 5 1963 (cracked down by Shah) and Islamic revolution in 1979 (failed military coup by American).. as you see it wouldn't have taken this long more than 80 years if it was just all about poverty ..

- In Saudi Arabia protesting against government is against the law , let people talk then you see if anyone wants to change this the so-called stable and efficient government or not.

 

[The SC]

-In Egypt en elected government was overthrown through military coup not people other excuses like economy and politics to justify it is not acceptable.

-In many countries people live in poverty , why we do not see revolution there? Iranian quest for democracy and independence has a long history from Constitutional Revolution back in 1903 (Russian bombed the parliament) to nationalization of oil industry back in 1953 (Military coup by MI6 and CIA) to The demonstrations of June 5 1963 (cracked down by Shah) and Islamic revolution in 1979 (failed military coup by American).. as you see it wouldn't have taken this long more than 80 years if it was just all about poverty ..

- In Saudi Arabia protesting against government is against the law , let people talk then you see if anyone wants to change this the so-called stable and efficient government or not.

- Actually the Egyptian MB was overthrown by the people too, only after it gave order for killing protesters, it was taken out by the military..
- Poor people accept to live poorly in poor countries, since they know their governments can not do much about it.. Iran was rich..filthy rich when the majority of its people lived in poverty.. there is a world of difference between the two cases..
- You do not protest against your government when you have a good life as well as your children and family.. if you protest with your own views not shared by the majority, it means you have a political agenda or some weird views to destabilise a stable government, this is not tolerated anywhere..to some point it can be allowed in some places, but when you call for armed resistance or take up arms then it is not allowed.. the same in Iran or anywhere else..
Why would anyone protest on the streets when he has a good life? it is just strange and suspicious..

 

[pin gu]

There is 3 prominent and major types of governing system and school of thoughts which are backbones of governments in the region:
1: Muslim Brotherhood which are represented by Turkey , Qatar and Egypt (Morsi) block ..
2: Islamic republic which is represented by Iran since revolution.
3: Monarchy Wahhabism which is represented by Saudis and UAEs ..

As you've seen these 3 have tried to extend their influence throughout of the region by having regimes sharing same mindset ... the first one and second one offer people democracy and election while the third one no , the reason why the third group are against two first ones is this , that's why they supported Saddam against us (imagine what would have happened if people of southern parts of Persian gulf wanted to revolt against dictators like Iranians , womething that happened back in 2011 in Bahrain and Yemen and have been cracked down since then) That's why Turkey supports Qatar and was supporting Morsi and that's why Saudis supported coup against Morsi .. though other reasons are involvled too ..


Many didn't take him serious whom are no longer in the power ...

I know a little bit about these countries , their similarities their differences but at the end for one group the goal is to keep Islam crown ( KSA and guys ) and others is to keep trying to reach the crown that's the main goal .
Qatar has been useful for them to start chaos in Syria because KSA didn't have needed influence on Syrian people to start full scale Syria war so they used Qatar and Egypt (MB ) influence on Syrian's and things started according to the plans in middle of the road in 2014 I think the Saudis wanted bigger share and took it from their allies(MB) in Syria .
as we can see now Saudis don't want MB influence any more and they believe they can
continue on their own . so what does it mean ?
MB reached the breaking point by taking wrong policies ?
or Saudi and Co think they got much more powerful that they can dominate region and fighting other 2 regional rivals at the same time ?

 

[SALMAN F]

The Wahhabi terrorism started by Saudis and the qataris came later so trying to blame terrori on Qatar only is ridiculous

 

[OldTwilight]

Qatar is bad , but KSA is worst and USA is THE GREAT SATAN