What's new

10 captives, Over 20 soldiers, including Commanding Officer killed at Galwan border clash with China

As per the history and records, China will never disclosed casulities from his side

1967: In Sikkim, India pushes China back
  • Tensions came to a head again in 1967 along two mountain passes, Nathu La and Cho La, that connected Sikkim — then a kingdom and a protectorate of India — and China’s Tibet Autonomous Region.
  • A scuffle broke out when Indian troops began laying barbed wire along what they recognized as the border.
  • The scuffles soon escalated when a Chinese military unit began firing artillery shells at the Indians.
  • In the ensuing conflict, more than 150 Indians and 340 Chinese were killed.
  • The clashes in September and October 1967 in those passes would later be considered the second all-out war between China and India.
  • But India prevailed, destroying Chinese fortifications in Nathu La and pushing them farther back into their territory near Cho La.
  • The change in positions, however, meant that China and India each had different and conflicting ideas about the location of the Line of Actual Control.
  • The fighting was the last time that troops on either side would be killed. — until the skirmishes in the Galwan Valley on Tuesday.
https://www.civilsdaily.com/news/india-china-border-dispute-a-conflict-years-in-the-making/

1967 Nathu La conflict
Another flashpoint was Nathu La, India's highest mountain pass in northeastern Sikkim state, which is sandwiched between Bhutan, Chinese-ruled Tibet and Nepal.

During a series of clashes, including the exchange of artillery fire, New Delhi said some 80 Indian soldiers died and counted up to 400 Chinese casualties.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...es-decades-long-conflict-200617025851066.html

Wikipedia 1967 again...lol...
But where is the proof? Can you show something like this:
u=2863323480,3557155203&fm=26&gp=0.jpg

or this:
timg

???


1967? Shameless Indians keep editing Wiki.

Old Wiki from 2012 says Chinese side 10 killed. Current page says 350 killed. Death toll kept increasing over the years.:omghaha:

2012
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nathu_La_and_Cho_La_incidents&oldid=479366958


Current
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathu_La_and_Cho_La_incidents
 
. .
I starting to hear versions that this was more of an accident than a fight, the both sides where clashing close to a riff before its collapse. The stupidity.
Is this is true there commanders that should lose their jobs.

What you heard is true.

Indian and Chinese soldiers were pushing and shoving on the mountain cliff when the cliff gave-in due to hundreds of soldiers on the cliff. Both Indian and Chinese soldiers fell into the ravine and died.
 
. . .
Not the whole media.. The online news website that is saying that US intelligence (ignoring CNN, Fox, Washington Post, New York Times, Foreign Policy etc) approached US News.com tabloid.. I mean come on..
The USNEWS has some credibility for its university rankings, and that's pretty much about it.
 
.
All accross.
It means no more trusting any chinese agreements,we go in everywhere armed so they cant kill any soldier unarmed like they ambushed our CO.Ab se boli nahi,goli bolegi.
The hans are not used to mountain fighting and scared of dying because one child system.We have the largest and most experienced mountain force in the whole world with 12 dug in mountain divisions.If the hans want a mauling they will get it.Absolutely no need to worry.The only advantage china has are its SRBMs,but not nearly enough to sustain pressure though first wave will cause losses.We can counter that by cutting off their supplies and oil through indian ocean and malacca with our navy and sukhois from south idnia and andaman with brahmos.They have only one supply line into ladakh which we will bring under immediate pressure and their logistics will be hamstrung.We are much closer to homeground and with the patriotic population of ladakhis fully behind the army.
One last question if you don't mind. It's more about your personal opinion.

Going forward in the immediate future (next 1-2 months) you think we will see a de-escalation (with chinese casualties in the open) or IA still plans to rub the chinese nose in the ground? Considering the larger geopolitical view in mind.
How is the mood among the forces?
 
. . . .
There is a third option and it is the option he will take.

Option 3: Sit on his ar$e and take his punishment from the Chinese and de-escalate because that's what he's been told to do.
Will happen only in your dreams.
 
. . .
Hard to believe , what is source of American claiming such numbers
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom