What's new

Search results

  1. T

    How tall are you lot? Heights around the world revealed, in landmark study.

    Nutrition is certainly one of the main reasons for growth but you can not really generalise based on birthdates. My grandfather was 190 cm tall, my father is only 173 cm and I am 181 cm tall. Despite of the fact that I grew up in a western European country I was not able to reach the height of...
  2. T

    How tall are you lot? Heights around the world revealed, in landmark study.

    I am 181 cm. For men it is certainly better to be tall but not for women.
  3. T

    What is important to Pakistani

    You forgot to add the option Arab :D
  4. T

    Indian Irony at its best.Crocodiles are Guarding Indian Border from Pakistan: Indian Media

    Actually Pakistanis movies are the funniest movies that I have watched so far. The following movie is the most hilarious Pakistani movie which shows the Arab conquest of Pakistan in the 8th century. I laughed my *** off because of this Pakistani movie.:rofl:
  5. T

    Devious Plans of China to bring in the issue of Andaman and Nicobar Islands ownership

    Not really. The islands were part of the Chola Empire and Maratha Empire so therefore it should belong to India. The Chinese claims are as always ridiculous.
  6. T

    India ranks 110th & Pakistan 115th on Sustainable Development index

    At least India is ahead of the land of pure:rofl:
  7. T

    Why do Indians dislike Pakistani attachment to Muhammad Bin Qasim?

    Perhaps he wanted to imply that he is proud about the fact that the ruler from Pakistan Porus lost the war against the Greeks while the ruler from India Chandragupta Maurya was able to defeat the Greeks.:partay:
  8. T

    Why do Indians dislike Pakistani attachment to Muhammad Bin Qasim?

    According to your logic Pakistan is worse than sub-saharan Africa as Pakistan has a lower GDP per capita, a lower literacy rate and a lower HDI than India.
  9. T

    Why do Indians dislike Pakistani attachment to Muhammad Bin Qasim?

    Not really. The major part of India was ruled for almost the same amount of time as Pakistan by the British. What is funny is the fact that Pakistan was ruled for almost 2000 years by foreign invaders like the Greeks, Persians, Huns, Arabs, Turks and Mongols because Pakistan was mostly dominated...
  10. T

    Hafiz Saeed leads Kashmir Caravan, vows to march towards J&K

    No you are wrong. Since ancient times the people of India considered themselves as part of one civilization called Bharat which is confirmed by ancient and medieval texts and records like the Prakrit and Sanskrit literature of north India and the Sangam literature of south India. On the other...
  11. T

    Do Indian Muslims feel lucky to be citizens of India, not Pakistan or Bangladesh which were once par

    Again wrong. Mamluk literally means owned slaves. Of course the Turkic slave soldiers revolted against their Arab masters. But this does not change the fact that they were slave soldiers. All the Turkic rulers were descendants of slave soldiers.
  12. T

    Do Indian Muslims feel lucky to be citizens of India, not Pakistan or Bangladesh which were once par

    Haha you are a retard. The Turks, who were forced to turn into Islamic soldiers, were still slaves which is the reason why they were called Mamluks. You obviously do not have a clue
  13. T

    Do Indian Muslims feel lucky to be citizens of India, not Pakistan or Bangladesh which were once par

    You obviously do not know much about the history of the Arab military expansion. It is a well known fact that the Arabs enslaved a huge number of people in the lands which they conquered. Ever heard of the great Arab slave trade which traded and sold slaves from Europe, Persia, North Africa and...
  14. T

    Hafiz Saeed leads Kashmir Caravan, vows to march towards J&K

    You do not make much sense. According to your logic Pakistanis should be ashamed about the fact that they use the Arabic script and that they have Arabic names and follow the Arab culture. You also do not seem to understand that most Indians are proud of all the great Dynasties that were...
  15. T

    Do Indian Muslims feel lucky to be citizens of India, not Pakistan or Bangladesh which were once par

    There is no need to get so angry only because your ancestors were conquered and enslaved by Arabs. Unlike Pakistanis most Indians do not use the Arabic script or follow the Arab culture because of the great Pratihara Dynasty and Chalukya Dynasty which defeated the Arab invaders and protected...
  16. T

    We Pakistanis should support our Kashmiri brothers: Hafiz Saeed

    A very funny claim. Only Pakistan was ruled for more than 1000 years by Arabs, Turks and Mongols and not India. Do not mistake your pathetic history with the history of India.
  17. T

    Do Indian Muslims feel lucky to be citizens of India, not Pakistan or Bangladesh which were once par

    Actually only the ancestors of Pakistanis were the slaves as they were conquered and enslaved for 1000 years by Arabs, Turks and Mongols which is the main reason why Pakistanis use the Arab writing system, have Arabic names and even follow the Arab culture. The Pakistanis simply do what they...
  18. T

    Do Indian Muslims feel lucky to be citizens of India, not Pakistan or Bangladesh which were once par

    Not really. While it is true that Pakistan was easily conquered and ruled for 1000 years by Arabs, Turks and Mongols as the ancestors of Pakistanis were rather weak. But this is not the case for India. The Arabs were never able to invade the region of India as they were defeated by the Pratihara...
  19. T

    Why do Indians dislike Pakistani attachment to Muhammad Bin Qasim?

    This does not matter as Delhi does not even comprise 2% of India`s land mass. On the other hand whole Pakistan was indeed ruled for 1000 years by Arabs, Turks and Mongols.
  20. T

    Why do Indians dislike Pakistani attachment to Muhammad Bin Qasim?

    Again wrong. Delhi was ruled for 200 years by the Mughals until they were defeated by the Maratha Empire in the early 18th century.
Back
Top Bottom